Free Essay


In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By adb362
Words 307
Pages 2
Alexandra Bero
PSY 327-02
March 1, 2016

Toleration is perhaps one of the most important aspects of any society throughout the world. Understanding and accepting other individual’s ideals and beliefs can bring a sense of compassion. It takes you out of the selfish simple mind and introduces a deeper more complex way of thinking while in a sense tests your own beliefs. With more knowledge comes more of an understanding of people in general. With that deeper understanding can create a more open and understanding world with less discrimination. Someone who grew up in an all white town, with one set of religious beliefs and one way of living may be confined to just a simple mind set. Their views of other religions, races and ways of living may be negatively brought, either by television, social media or the Internet. When they are eventually exposed to differences in their real life, such as going off to college in a big city. Their opinions may change after a certain amount of time. Their stereotypes may change after meeting someone of a category they believed a certain way of. Questions may arise but in essence their tolerance to new and different ideals is based off of knowledge and education from the direct source rather than from a manipulated area such as media.
The importance of knowledge and education within our world can bring about greatness and positivity. Everything good, in most cases, is brought about by education and knowledge. With that as a basis our world could change drastically. Learning of new religions outside of the one you might be practicing would be something that could build tolerance and knowledge, as well as compassion. Putting yourself outside of your customs and beliefs is a huge factor within tolerance; perhaps it is the greatest aspect of tolerance.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Similarities Between Classical and Modern Liberals Are Greater Than the Differences. Discuss capable of developing and flourishing to the fullness of their potential. Both modern and classical liberalists regarded this ideology to be one very much characterised by a willingness to accept, and even sometimes celebrate moral, cultural and political diversity. Such a versatile acceptance of people made liberals strongly related to the theme of toleration. Voltaire memorably portrays this view is his declaration that ‘I detest what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it’. Although the case of toleration was first adopted by the likes of John Locke who defended religious freedom, the concept progressed so that toleration should be extended to all matters regarded as ‘private’ on the grounds that, like religion, they concern moral questions that should be left to the individual. J.S. Mill then developed a wider justification for toleration that both modern and classical liberalists adopted; toleration was just as important to society as to the individual. So toleration was not simply a guarantee for personal autonomy, but ensured the dynamism and health of society. All liberalists believed toleration brought about debate, argument and contest, which was inevitably bring about social progress. However, I consider the tensions and differences between classical and modern liberalists to be far more apparent when scrutinising this ideology. Although liberals agree about the value of liberty, their views on what it means to be ‘free’ vary......

Words: 1729 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...constraints, and the latter as freedom under the law. Similarly, some defined both concepts in terms of their implications for the state, so conflating the two parts of the question. 3. Outline a liberal defence of toleration and pluralism. (Jun 02) Toleration is a willingness to accept beliefs and actions with which one disagrees. Pluralism as a normative theory, is the belief that multiplicity or diversity desirable. Liberals defend toleration and pluralism on the grounds that they benefit both the individual and society. They uphold individual rights and freedoms and ensure solid progress by testing truth against rival conceptions of reality. Other justifications are linked to individualism and its implication of human uniqueness, and the underlying liberal belief in consensus and social harmony. Strong responses will consider justifications that go beyond individual freedom. Most candidates simply treated toleration and pluralism as examples of diversity and failed to offer definitions at the outset. Most responses highlighted the protection of individual liberty as a key basis for toleration, but few picked up on the issue of pluralism enabling the 'truth' to emerge from debate in a diverse and pluralistic society. Thus, candidates viewed toleration and pluralism as good for the individual, but few saw it as socially desirable in a larger sense. 4. What kind of equality do liberals support, and why? (Jan 03) Liberals support several kinds of......

Words: 13343 - Pages: 54

Free Essay

A Letter Concerning Toleration

...In John Locke's A Letter Concerning Toleration, he contends that government has no authority over people who neglect their souls, health, and estate (406). From Locke's perspective, government's only aim is to protect one's property. By making laws that protect the property of the people from the harm of others, a government makes its citizens more autonomous. However, government's authority to establish laws comes from the consent of people who forfeit some of their natural rights (Locke, 304). In a sense, people have to give up some of their right in order to achieve greater autonomous. Because Locke believes that each person is his or her best judge of what he or she wants, as long as a person does not damage other's body or property, government should not interfere with his or her life. With regard to the relationship between government and religion, Locke states that "the care of souls does not belong to the magistrate" (Locke, 405). Put simply, government should not coerce anyone into a certain religion or belief because the purpose of government is to protect people's property. Even though the only authority that religious groups have is to care for one's soul, religious groups should not force other people to believe in their doctrines because each individual has the freedom to choose his belief. Although Locke admits that there is only "one true way to eternal happiness," he believes that no man knows which path is right(Locke, 407). As the result, no one, not......

Words: 653 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

John Locke

...colonization. He worked closely with early settlers who left for the New World, helping with the drafting of the Fundamental Constitution. The principal writings by John Locke that are influential to the teachings of philosophy are The Essay on Toleration; An Essay Concerning Human Understanding; Two Treatises, On Civil Government, Thoughts Concerning Education; and The Reasonableness of Christianity. Each one of these writings was very important in the rise of liberal political philosophy. Locke’s opinions on religion and government stemmed from his childhood. There was a sense of respect for the law, and his Puritan upbringing conveyed to him some strong religious convictions. A crucial turning point in his philosophical development was a 1665 trip abroad to Cleves, where he observed a community of different religious groups living together peacefully. This experience may have challenged his ideas about the necessity of state-appointed religion and led to the later writing of his Essay on Toleration. In the Essay Concerning Toleration, Locke begins to develop a view of religious toleration, one that will define the separation between church and state. The essay provided the foundation of American thought. They discussed the toleration of minority beliefs and practices in the new American experiment. The importance of this piece and how it applies to our society today is great. Locke writes: “The care of Souls cannot belong to the Civil Magistrate, because his......

Words: 2488 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

John Locke's Influence on American Politics

...arguing that the latter had no place in government. Natural law is distinct from divine law as divine law often refers to those laws that God had directly revealed through prophets (Woolhouse, 2007). Locke’s argument in A Letter Concerning Toleration was that natural law can be discovered by reason alone and applies to all people, while divine law can be discovered only through God's special revelation and applies only to those to whom it is revealed and who God specifically indicates in his messages. From this, Locke argued that the 10 commandments were not binding on all people as they begin by explicitly addressing those in Israel and therefore the words that followed should only be binding to the people of Israel (“Letter Concerning Toleration”, 1689). In Locke's theory, divine law and natural law are consistent and can overlap in content, but they are not coextensive, meaning there is no problem for Locke if the Bible commands a moral code that is stricter than the one from natural law, but there is a real problem if the divine law overpowers the natural law in the realm of government. Furthermore, Locke denied that intimidation should be used to bring people to what the ruling few believes is the true religion (Letter Concerning Toleration, 1689). Locke argues in his letters that there is no command in the Bible telling government officials to bring people to the true faith and as people cannot simply believe at will in something because the government tells them to,......

Words: 1084 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Contribution of Baptists in the Struggle for Religious Freedom

...gone to and the enormous price paid by so many to obtain and preserve this right. In the United States when one does reflect on this matter his or her thoughts rightfully focus on the many men and women of the armed forces who fought to gain and keep the freedoms the citizens of this nation enjoy. What is often overlooked is the contributions of Baptists in the centuries long struggle to obtain religious freedom. Their struggle began not in the American colonies but rather in England a century earlier. “The freedom of religious belief and behavior which modern Baptists and others take for granted was forged in the crucible of persecution in seventeenth-century England” McBeth adds that, “No group can claim more credit for the Act of Toleration, passed by Parliament in 1689.” The struggle that began in England would later be waged again in America. Few people today realize that it is largely through the efforts of Baptists that religious freedom was granted in the Bill of Rights. The simple fact is that the religious freedom enjoyed by much of the world today could not have been achieved without the contributions of courageous Baptist leaders such as Roger Williams, Isaac Backus, John Leland, and a host of others. IN THE BEGINNING The quest for religious freedom was an essential element of the Baptist witness right from the start. Historians often attribute this fact to the persecution experienced by the earliest Baptists. According to McBeth, “Early Baptists faced......

Words: 3493 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

West Point Case, and even caused for the involvement of the secretary of the army and congress. DIAGNOSIS- The cause of the problem stems from the vagueness of the Honor Code. The Honor Code simply states: “A cadet will not lie, cheat, or steal nor tolerate those who do.” The fact the Honor Code has a toleration clause makes the system code extremely difficult to enforce. The dilemma that Lt. General Berry, the Superintendent, had was whether to use the Code as a determination of guilt of the cadets or a more detailed and systematic method. During the case some of the accused cadets begin to write affidavits implementing their fellow classmates. They pointed out specific incidents of other cadets lying, cheating, and stealing. If the Honor Code does not allow toleration then that would mean that the other cadets would have to be tried for the violations of the code as well. THEORY- The theory that applies to this case is personal accountability. One of the things that really stuck out about the case, in my opinion, is the affidavits from the accused cadets. After they got caught, they wanted to tell things that they should have told from the beginning, according to the Honor Code’s toleration clause. I think that the cadets that got caught should have taken responsibility for their own actions and accepted the consequences. Only if the cadet knew that they did not cheat should have been the only reason they wanted to appeal not because they got caught and someone else didn’t.......

Words: 444 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...First Consul. Then in 1804 he declared himself Emperor of the French. Napoleon obtained absolute power. His domestic policy continued many reforms that the revolution had started. Napoleon came up with a law code that brought together many reforms of the revolution, and combined them into a single legal system. It was called the Napoleonic Code and was his greatest accomplishment in government. It recognized that all men were created equal and granted religious toleration, as well as a person’s right to work in any occupation that they are qualified for. Napoleon believed that the man should be in control of the family and household. But Napoleon did make many good reforms, for example, he imposed a law that made it mandatory for all citizens to pay taxes. This greatly improved the French economy. But it didn't stop there, Napoleon created a national bank for France, where tax money was deposited and paper money was issued. He also put together government-run schools. Napoleon preserved the idea of religious toleration. This was good for Napoleon because he did not lose any support of people in the church. Negative Effects of Napoleon’s Rule: There were deaths of hundreds of thousands of French soldiers during the Napoleonic Wars. The French economy was ruined by the cost of the wars and the effects of the British naval blockade. France lost overseas possessions and in influence on North America, Haiti, and India. Napoleon attempted to reintroduce slavery in Haiti. Also the......

Words: 573 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Relationship Between Electoral Process and Stability in Nigeria

...regimes by decreasing external pressure towards democratization and even generate international support that will strengthen the regime against the opposition and help it suppress internal democratic demands. On the other hand, if an autocratic regime is unable to convince the international community of the freeness and fairness of their elections or to muster enough domestic political support to actually beat the opposition, it will have to consider the option of making concessions or handing over some (or all) of the political power to the opposition. Concessions (or toleration) often come with demands that may be extremely hard to swallow for the incumbents. In addition to diminishing the control of political power, it may also lead to a loss of economic benefits or legal impunity and sometimes even physical insecurity (Schedler 2010a: 6–7). If the incumbent elite is not ready to pay the costs of toleration it is likely to use all means necessary to stay in power. As any state power at the end of the day resorts to the threat of (monopolized) violence, when all else fails, (political/electoral) violence may turn out to be the only viable strategy for autocratic rulers so that they can stay in power amidst growing democratic demands. Paul Collier and Pedro C. Vincent (2012) see electoral violence and political intimidation, along with vote buying and election fraud, as the main illicit strategies used by the incumbents so that they can hang on to power in electoral......

Words: 23070 - Pages: 93

Premium Essay

Apush Outline

...Spanish, English and French Colonial Outline Thesis: Throughout the early period of colonization in America, the three chief colonial powerhouses Spain, England, and France, tackled the issues of royal authority, sources of profit and trading rituals, as well as religious practice and toleration in shockingly different ways with few similarities. Background: As each of these world superpowers arrived in the new world during the 1500s, they were all looking to expand their empire and gain wealth. The Spanish came first and took the most action early. The French and English soon began to experiment in the Americas as well, although the French would only grasp a small portion of valuable land during their campaigns. Political Paragraph: Spanish, French, and English colonial empires had some clear similar political strategies in that this land was theirs for the taking, yet these similarities were shattered by the many other differences in their political policies. ● Spanish and French colonies both totally subservient to the crown, English had some degree of autonomy through salutary neglect. ● Spanish were extremely aggressive towards Indians, English were peaceful when it was good for them, brutal when it wasn't, and the French traded with the Indians and hired them to gather beaver fur under good relations. ● The English colonies grew much faster than the French and Spanish due to loose immigration policies and dedicated colonies. ● English colonies were......

Words: 533 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

John Locke Toleration

...One of the arguments presented in John Locke’s “Toleration” is regarding the fact that both the government and religious societies shall not enforce people to accept the ideal true religion. Locke believes that no other man should be able to tell others what to do about their faith or their belief in religion. In addition, he thinks that neither the government nor the religious institutes have jurisdiction over one another. On page 15, he states that “for the civil government can give no new right to the church, nor the church to the civil government” (Locke). John Locke argues that the fact that people use force and coercion to try to lead people to religion is entirely hypocritical as Jesus, the same man they follow, did not act that way. I think that what Locke is trying to argue here is the fact that people’s belief in religion must me consensual. I do believe in what he is saying however I believe that his argument could have been strengthened. John Locke could have gone further to say that even if people are forced to coerce to a religion, they will never experience the full experience of being a religious person. Those who are forced to follow in the footsteps of the government or religious institutions are no different than sheep that think irrationality. A person who is reasoned by logic to think that the government or religious institution is correct or one that makes sense will be twice as hard to convert to another entity of religion and politics. I think that......

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Dunbar Notes

...experience, or through empiricism. Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690) Locke explained that all human beings enter the world with a tabula rasa, or blank page and thus experience—and only experience—shapes character. This behavioralists theory implied that human nature is changeable and can be modified by changing the surrounding environment. Locke’s psychology rejected the Christian doctrine that sin permanently flawed human beings and humans need not wait for God or other divine aid to better their lives because they can take charge of their own destiny. The Example of British Toleration and Political Stability After 1688, political and economic stability in England furnished a living example of a society in which enlightened reforms seemed to benefit everyone. Examples of England’s Enlightened culture Religion England permitted religious toleration to all except Unitarians and Roman Catholics, and even they were not actively persecuted. Politics The power of monarchy was limited and political sovereignty rested in Parliament. Courts protected citizens from arbitrary imprisonment. Economics Domestic economic life of Great Britain displayed far less regulation than that of France or other continental nations The Emergence of a Print Culture Print culture can be defined as a culture in which books, journals, newspapers, and pamphlets had achieved a status. Print culture before the eighteenth century Print culture......

Words: 5147 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Role of Islam in the Ottoman Empire

...Anna Kindyakova World History 12/15/2015 In this essay I will attempt to answer the following question: What role did Islam play in the Ottoman and Mughal empires and what was the situation for religious minority groups? Overall, especially compared to Europe, religious toleration was very high in the two empires. While religious toleration varied along the years and the importance of Islam and its role in the two empires changed, it is safe to say that both of the empires went through a period of time where religion played a vital role in the people’s lives and tolerance of minority groups was at a high point. I will look more in-depth at the overall role that religion played in the empires as well as discuss both the positives and the negatives of the situation for minority groups. Islam played a big role in the Ottoman Empire. As a religion it was a focal point around which the rulers based their decisions as faith was a “major pillar of dynasty and empire”(Stearns, Peter N. World Civilizations. Fifth Edition. 2007. Pg. 580) . Islam played a role of civilization and it is also what encouraged emperors to keep expanding the empire. Finally it promoted principles of political succession- in other words it stimulated competition. Overall the religion served to bind people together and achieve a stable regime. Similarly in the Safavid Empire there was a lot of emphasis put on Shi’ism, and citizens......

Words: 1130 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Henry Iv

...The Willingness of Henry IV to Embrace Religious Toleration Henry IV of France, born Henry de Bourbon, was the son of Jeanne d’Albret the King of Navarre. Although baptized as a Roman Catholic, young Henry was raised as a Protestant. During the French Wars of Religion, he joined the Huguenot forces and became one of the leading Huguenots after the deaths of both Conde and Coligny. He was crowned King Henry III of Navarre after the death of his mother in June of 1572. After the third and bloodiest of the religious wars, which ended after the signing of the Peace of Saint-Germain-En-Laye, Catherine de Medici, who was Queen of France at the time, arranged to have her daughter, Margaret, marry Henry III of Navarre, in an attempt to cement the peace. The marriage was unpopular with many prominent Catholics, especially Pope Gregory XIII and King Philip II of Spain. Soon after the marriage, the Massacre of St Bartholomew’s Day broke out, over 20000 Protestants were killed in four days throughout France. The King of France at the time, Henry the III, attempted to guide the nation by steering a course between the vengeful Huguenots, and the Catholic League which was a large organization of zealous and dedicated Catholics. Henry granted the Huguenots almost complete religious and civil freedom with the Peace of Beaulieu in 1576, but he was forced to revoke it the next year because of Catholic League pressure. In the mid 1580’s, the Catholic League became dominant in France. After he...

Words: 1186 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

George Crowder

...central public ideal. Keywords: liberalism; autonomy; toleration; value pluralism; William Galston; exit; diversity Introduction: Diversity, Autonomy, and Value Pluralism What view should liberals take of the internal practices of nonliberal religious and cultural minorities within liberal democracies? This issue has divided liberal opinion into two main camps. On one side, there are those who see liberalism as standing primarily for the autonomy of the individual person. Nonliberal groups that place serious restrictions on the autonomy of their members will on this view be liable to criticism and perhaps intervention by a liberal state. On the other side, there are those who identify liberalism with maximal toleration of the beliefs and practices of different social groups. This kind of liberal tends to regard the ideal of individual autonomy as too demanding a principle for liberal politics, since many nonliberal Author’s Note: I wish to thank Mary Dietz and Political Theory’s anonymous readers for their excellent comments and advice. 121 Downloaded from at Ebsco Electronic Journals Service (EJS) on September 6, 2008 122 Political Theory groups do not value that kind of personal freedom. To use the state to intervene in such groups to promote individual autonomy, or even to criticise them for their resistance to that ideal, is to fail in liberalism’s principal duty of group toleration. This debate raises fundamental issues in liberal......

Words: 12946 - Pages: 52