Free Essay

The Necklace

In: English and Literature

Submitted By nataliademoss
Words 2874
Pages 12
The Necklace

by Guy de Maupassant
(1850-1893)

Translators: Albert M.C. McMaster, A.E. Henderson, Mme. Quesada, & others.

The girl was one of those pretty and charming young creatures who sometimes are born, as if by a slip of fate, into a family of clerks. She had no dowry, no expectations, no way of being known, understood, loved, married by any rich and distinguished man; so she let herself be married to a little clerk of the Ministry of Public Instruction.

She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was unhappy as if she had really fallen from a higher station; since with women there is neither caste nor rank, for beauty, grace and charm take the place of family and birth. Natural ingenuity, instinct for what is elegant, a supple mind are their sole hierarchy, and often make of women of the people the equals of the very greatest ladies.

Mathilde suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born to enjoy all delicacies and all luxuries. She was distressed at the poverty of her dwelling, at the bareness of the walls, at the shabby chairs, the ugliness of the curtains. All those things, of which another woman of her rank would never even have been conscious, tortured her and made her angry. The sight of the little Breton peasant who did her humble housework aroused in her despairing regrets and bewildering dreams. She thought of silent antechambers hung with Oriental tapestry, illumined by tall bronze candelabra, and of two great footmen in knee breeches who sleep in the big armchairs, made drowsy by the oppressive heat of the stove. She thought of long reception halls hung with ancient silk, of the dainty cabinets containing priceless curiosities and of the little coquettish perfumed reception rooms made for chatting at five o'clock with intimate friends, with men famous and sought after, whom all women envy and whose attention they all desire.

When she sat down to dinner, before the round table covered with a tablecloth in use three days, opposite her husband, who uncovered the soup tureen and declared with a delighted air, "Ah, the good soup! I don't know anything better than that," she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry that peopled the walls with ancient personages and with strange birds flying in the midst of a fairy forest; and she thought of delicious dishes served on marvellous plates and of the whispered gallantries to which you listen with a sphinxlike smile while you are eating the pink meat of a trout or the wings of a quail.

She had no gowns, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but that. She felt made for that. She would have liked so much to please, to be envied, to be charming, to be sought after.

She had a friend, a former schoolmate at the convent, who was rich, and whom she did not like to go to see any more because she felt so sad when she came home.

But one evening her husband reached home with a triumphant air and holding a large envelope in his hand.

"There," said he, "there is something for you."

She tore the paper quickly and drew out a printed card which bore these words:

The Minister of Public Instruction and Madame Georges Ramponneau request the honor of M. and Madame Loisel's company at the palace of the Ministry on Monday evening, January 18th.

Instead of being delighted, as her husband had hoped, she threw the invitation on the table crossly, muttering:

"What do you wish me to do with that?"

"Why, my dear, I thought you would be glad. You never go out, and this is such a fine opportunity. I had great trouble to get it. Every one wants to go; it is very select, and they are not giving many invitations to clerks. The whole official world will be there."

She looked at him with an irritated glance and said impatiently:

"And what do you wish me to put on my back?"

He had not thought of that. He stammered:

"Why, the gown you go to the theatre in. It looks very well to me."

He stopped, distracted, seeing that his wife was weeping. Two great tears ran slowly from the corners of her eyes toward the corners of her mouth.

"What's the matter? What's the matter?" he answered.

By a violent effort she conquered her grief and replied in a calm voice, while she wiped her wet cheeks:

"Nothing. Only I have no gown, and, therefore, I can't go to this ball. Give your card to some colleague whose wife is better equipped than I am."

He was in despair. He resumed:

"Come, let us see, Mathilde. How much would it cost, a suitable gown, which you could use on other occasions--something very simple?"

She reflected several seconds, making her calculations and wondering also what sum she could ask without drawing on herself an immediate refusal and a frightened exclamation from the economical clerk.

Finally she replied hesitating:

"I don't know exactly, but I think I could manage it with four hundred francs."

He grew a little pale, because he was laying aside just that amount to buy a gun and treat himself to a little shooting next summer on the plain of Nanterre, with several friends who went to shoot larks there of a Sunday.

But he said:

"Very well. I will give you four hundred francs. And try to have a pretty gown."

The day of the ball drew near and Madame Loisel seemed sad, uneasy, anxious. Her frock was ready, however. Her husband said to her one evening:

"What is the matter? Come, you have seemed very queer these last three days."

And she answered:

"It annoys me not to have a single piece of jewelry, not a single ornament, nothing to put on. I shall look poverty-stricken. I would almost rather not go at all."

"You might wear natural flowers," said her husband. "They're very stylish at this time of year. For ten francs you can get two or three magnificent roses."

She was not convinced.

"No; there's nothing more humiliating than to look poor among other women who are rich."

"How stupid you are!" her husband cried. "Go look up your friend, Madame Forestier, and ask her to lend you some jewels. You're intimate enough with her to do that."

She uttered a cry of joy:

"True! I never thought of it."

The next day she went to her friend and told her of her distress.

Madame Forestier went to a wardrobe with a mirror, took out a large jewel box, brought it back, opened it and said to Madame Loisel:

"Choose, my dear."

She saw first some bracelets, then a pearl necklace, then a Venetian gold cross set with precious stones, of admirable workmanship. She tried on the ornaments before the mirror, hesitated and could not make up her mind to part with them, to give them back. She kept asking:

"Haven't you any more?"

"Why, yes. Look further; I don't know what you like."

Suddenly she discovered, in a black satin box, a superb diamond necklace, and her heart throbbed with an immoderate desire. Her hands trembled as she took it. She fastened it round her throat, outside her high-necked waist, and was lost in ecstasy at her reflection in the mirror.

Then she asked, hesitating, filled with anxious doubt:

"Will you lend me this, only this?"

"Why, yes, certainly."

She threw her arms round her friend's neck, kissed her passionately, then fled with her treasure.

The night of the ball arrived. Madame Loisel was a great success. She was prettier than any other woman present, elegant, graceful, smiling and wild with joy. All the men looked at her, asked her name, sought to be introduced. All the attaches of the Cabinet wished to waltz with her. She was remarked by the minister himself.

She danced with rapture, with passion, intoxicated by pleasure, forgetting all in the triumph of her beauty, in the glory of her success, in a sort of cloud of happiness comprised of all this homage, admiration, these awakened desires and of that sense of triumph which is so sweet to woman's heart.

She left the ball about four o'clock in the morning. Her husband had been sleeping since midnight in a little deserted anteroom with three other gentlemen whose wives were enjoying the ball.

He threw over her shoulders the wraps he had brought, the modest wraps of common life, the poverty of which contrasted with the elegance of the ball dress. She felt this and wished to escape so as not to be remarked by the other women, who were enveloping themselves in costly furs.

Loisel held her back, saying: "Wait a bit. You will catch cold outside. I will call a cab."

But she did not listen to him and rapidly descended the stairs. When they reached the street they could not find a carriage and began to look for one, shouting after the cabmen passing at a distance.

They went toward the Seine in despair, shivering with cold. At last they found on the quay one of those ancient night cabs which, as though they were ashamed to show their shabbiness during the day, are never seen round Paris until after dark.

It took them to their dwelling in the Rue des Martyrs, and sadly they mounted the stairs to their flat. All was ended for her. As to him, he reflected that he must be at the ministry at ten o'clock that morning.

She removed her wraps before the glass so as to see herself once more in all her glory. But suddenly she uttered a cry. She no longer had the necklace around her neck!

"What is the matter with you?" demanded her husband, already half undressed.

She turned distractedly toward him.

"I have--I have--I've lost Madame Forestier's necklace," she cried.

He stood up, bewildered.

"What!--how? Impossible!"

They looked among the folds of her skirt, of her cloak, in her pockets, everywhere, but did not find it.

"You're sure you had it on when you left the ball?" he asked.

"Yes, I felt it in the vestibule of the minister's house."

"But if you had lost it in the street we should have heard it fall. It must be in the cab."

"Yes, probably. Did you take his number?"

"No. And you--didn't you notice it?"

"No."

They looked, thunderstruck, at each other. At last Loisel put on his clothes.

"I shall go back on foot," said he, "over the whole route, to see whether I can find it."

He went out. She sat waiting on a chair in her ball dress, without strength to go to bed, overwhelmed, without any fire, without a thought.

Her husband returned about seven o'clock. He had found nothing.

He went to police headquarters, to the newspaper offices to offer a reward; he went to the cab companies--everywhere, in fact, whither he was urged by the least spark of hope.

She waited all day, in the same condition of mad fear before this terrible calamity.

Loisel returned at night with a hollow, pale face. He had discovered nothing.

"You must write to your friend," said he, "that you have broken the clasp of her necklace and that you are having it mended. That will give us time to turn round."

She wrote at his dictation.

At the end of a week they had lost all hope. Loisel, who had aged five years, declared:

"We must consider how to replace that ornament."

The next day they took the box that had contained it and went to the jeweler whose name was found within. He consulted his books.

"It was not I, madame, who sold that necklace; I must simply have furnished the case."

Then they went from jeweler to jeweler, searching for a necklace like the other, trying to recall it, both sick with chagrin and grief.

They found, in a shop at the Palais Royal, a string of diamonds that seemed to them exactly like the one they had lost. It was worth forty thousand francs. They could have it for thirty-six.

So they begged the jeweler not to sell it for three days yet. And they made a bargain that he should buy it back for thirty-four thousand francs, in case they should find the lost necklace before the end of February.

Loisel possessed eighteen thousand francs which his father had left him. He would borrow the rest.

He did borrow, asking a thousand francs of one, five hundred of another, five louis here, three louis there. He gave notes, took up ruinous obligations, dealt with usurers and all the race of lenders. He compromised all the rest of his life, risked signing a note without even knowing whether he could meet it; and, frightened by the trouble yet to come, by the black misery that was about to fall upon him, by the prospect of all the physical privations and moral tortures that he was to suffer, he went to get the new necklace, laying upon the jeweler's counter thirty-six thousand francs.

When Madame Loisel took back the necklace Madame Forestier said to her with a chilly manner:

"You should have returned it sooner; I might have needed it."

She did not open the case, as her friend had so much feared. If she had detected the substitution, what would she have thought, what would she have said? Would she not have taken Madame Loisel for a thief?

Thereafter Madame Loisel knew the horrible existence of the needy. She bore her part, however, with sudden heroism. That dreadful debt must be paid. She would pay it. They dismissed their servant; they changed their lodgings; they rented a garret under the roof.

She came to know what heavy housework meant and the odious cares of the kitchen. She washed the dishes, using her dainty fingers and rosy nails on greasy pots and pans. She washed the soiled linen, the shirts and the dishcloths, which she dried upon a line; she carried the slops down to the street every morning and carried up the water, stopping for breath at every landing. And dressed like a woman of the people, she went to the fruiterer, the grocer, the butcher, a basket on her arm, bargaining, meeting with impertinence, defending her miserable money, sou by sou.

Every month they had to meet some notes, renew others, obtain more time.

Her husband worked evenings, making up a tradesman's accounts, and late at night he often copied manuscript for five sous a page.

This life lasted ten years.

At the end of ten years they had paid everything, everything, with the rates of usury and the accumulations of the compound interest.

Madame Loisel looked old now. She had become the woman of impoverished households--strong and hard and rough. With frowsy hair, skirts askew and red hands, she talked loud while washing the floor with great swishes of water. But sometimes, when her husband was at the office, she sat down near the window and she thought of that gay evening of long ago, of that ball where she had been so beautiful and so admired.

What would have happened if she had not lost that necklace? Who knows? who knows? How strange and changeful is life! How small a thing is needed to make or ruin us!

But one Sunday, having gone to take a walk in the Champs Elysees to refresh herself after the labors of the week, she suddenly perceived a woman who was leading a child. It was Madame Forestier, still young, still beautiful, still charming.

Madame Loisel felt moved. Should she speak to her? Yes, certainly. And now that she had paid, she would tell her all about it. Why not?

She went up.

"Good-day, Jeanne."

The other, astonished to be familiarly addressed by this plain good-wife, did not recognize her at all and stammered:

"But--madame!--I do not know---- You must have mistaken."

"No. I am Mathilde Loisel."

Her friend uttered a cry.

"Oh, my poor Mathilde! How you are changed!"

"Yes, I have had a pretty hard life, since I last saw you, and great poverty--and that because of you!"

"Of me! How so?"

"Do you remember that diamond necklace you lent me to wear at the ministerial ball?"

"Yes. Well?"

"Well, I lost it."

"What do you mean? You brought it back."

"I brought you back another exactly like it. And it has taken us ten years to pay for it. You can understand that it was not easy for us, for us who had nothing. At last it is ended, and I am very glad."

Madame Forestier had stopped.

"You say that you bought a necklace of diamonds to replace mine?"

"Yes. You never noticed it, then! They were very similar."

And she smiled with a joy that was at once proud and ingenuous.

Madame Forestier, deeply moved, took her hands.

"Oh, my poor Mathilde! Why, my necklace was paste! It was worth at most only five hundred francs!"…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...Theme and Narrative of “The Necklace” Renee’ Alsup ENG 125 Colin Garretson October 27, 2012 Theme and Narrative of “The Necklace” I have chosen Guy de Maupassant “The Necklace” to analyze in this week’s paper. This story is based on a couple who is in love, but not necessarily happy. Madame Loisel made do with what she had throughout life, but wanted better and wanted people to look up to her. “The Necklace” revolves around an outstanding piece of diamond jewelry. Madame Loisel is obsessed with this necklace and wants to be adorned by the other women at the party. Madame Loisel’s husband worked in the Department of Education. They were not well of people but made it through life. Madame Loisel always longed for more than what she had. As stated, she suffered intensely, feeling herself born for every delicacy and every luxury. She suffered from the poverty of her dwelling, from the worn walls, the abraded chairs, the ugliness of the stuffs.” (Clugston, 2010). Monsieur Loisel handed her, an invitation to a party for “The Minister of Education” requesting their attendance, she was not elated as he was in hopes she would be. The reason being is that she did not have a dress exquisite enough to wear. After offering to buy her a dress for the party, she still was not satisfied. “All right. I will give you four hundred francs. But take care to have a pretty dress.” (Clugston, 2010). She needed Jewelry. He offered flowers but she needed to be adorned by the......

Words: 883 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Necklace

...Title: “The Necklace” Author: Guy de Mauppassant Point of View: Third Person Setting Time: 18th century, over ten years’ time. Place: France Mood: Depressing Conflict: Man vs. Self – a woman’s struggle with wanting what she can’t have, and what she goes through after she tries to be something she’s not. Theme: Don’t be greedy, jealousy/greed can lead to your downfall, Things aren’t always as they seem, be happy with what you’ve got, character is shown through actions and not fancy apparel. Characters: 1. Name: Madame Mathilde Loisel Personality description: Charming, selfish, jealous Physical description: Pretty 2. Name: Monsieur Loisel Personality description: unselfish, wimpy/pushed around, generous, hardworking, loves his wife, likes to hunt 3. Name: Madame Jeanne Forrestier Personality description: Mathilde’s friend, kind, generous, trusting, wealthy Plot Details: Exposition – Learning about Madame and Monsieur Loisel and their background Rising action – Receiving an invitation to the ball, buys a dress and borrows the necklace, has a wonderful time at the ball Climax – Discovers the loss of the necklace, looks everywhere and cannot find it Falling action – They buy a matching replacement and spend 10 years paying it off Resolution – Madame Loisel comes clean to Madame Forrestier and finds out it was a fake. Identify at least five literary elements used and cite examples from the text. Alliteration – “Every......

Words: 405 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...Guy de Maupassant's short story "The Necklace", written in the late nineteenth century, tells the tale of a middle class woman named Madame Mathilde Loisel who only dreams of the finer things of life. Although she lives quite comfortably, she is dissatisfied with her life as being the wife of a clerk. Mr. Loisel is content with the life they live but still he puts forth all his effort to make her happy. One day, Loisel manages to secure the two of them invitations to a ball which was being thrown by his boss. This still doesn't please Mathilde due to her lack of fine clothing and jewelry. After having to buy a new dress and borrow a necklace from her old friend Mrs. Forrestier, the couple arrive at the ball, only for Mathilde to become the center of attention. The author goes on to explain that it was the tragic misfortune that happened the night of the ball that caused the devastating turn of events soon turning Mathilde's dream into a nightmare. Aside from the ironic twist caused by the necklace, Maupassant also expresses many points of symbolism throughout the story which piece together the events to the characters. In the beginning of the story, it's clear to realize that Mathilde constantly dreams of having nothing more than the finest luxuries. Instead of being grateful for the fine apparal she does have throughout her household, she describes them as "drab", "threadbare", and "ugly" (paragraph 3). It's apparent that the author is portraying......

Words: 635 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...Theme and Narrative of “The Necklace” I have chosen Guy de Maupassant “The Necklace” to analyze in this week’s paper. This story is based on a couple who is in love, but not necessarily happy. Madame Loisel made do with what she had throughout life, but wanted better and wanted people to look up to her. “The Necklace” revolves around an outstanding piece of diamond jewelry. Madame Loisel is obsessed with this necklace and wants to be adorned by the other women at the party. Madame Loisel’s husband worked in the Department of Education. They were not well of people but made it through life. Madame Loisel always longed for more than what she had. As stated, she suffered intensely, feeling herself born for every delicacy and every luxury. She suffered from the poverty of her dwelling, from the worn walls, the abraded chairs, the ugliness of the stuffs.” (Clugston, 2010). Monsieur Loisel handed her, an invitation to a party for “The Minister of Education” requesting their attendance, she was not elated as he was in hopes she would be. The reason being is that she did not have a dress exquisite enough to wear. After offering to buy her a dress for the party, she still was not satisfied. “All right. I will give you four hundred francs. But take care to have a pretty dress.” (Clugston, 2010). She needed Jewelry. He offered flowers but she needed to be adorned by the other women by wearing jewels and showing that she measured up to them. “You will wear some natural flowers.”......

Words: 327 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Necklace Transformation

...The Necklace Transformation – Story Poem She’s married to a little clerk who loves her dearly but clearly she shows no interest. Marriage was something she had never considered, She didn’t hold no hopes and dreams – just was living her life by being the prettiest. She had modest taste due to absence of funds but jewels and diamonds was all she ever pictured. The furniture of her own home wasn’t at all what she expected, The mean walls, worn chairs and ugly curtains were an insult to her ‘luxury lifestyle’. Deep down in her soul she was not content and didn’t feel connected With this lower class lifestyle. Dinner was served and her husband was overjoyed shown by his smile, He even exclaimed “What could be better?” A reaction she very well suspected. Her pride had always gotten the best of her. There was this one friend – elegant and rich – An old school friend, but she couldn’t bring herself to visit her because of her suffering. She was a victim of her emotions and she couldn’t seem to control the weeping and tears in which She had been crying and distress and torment she was covering. An invitation was given to her by her husband which requested the company of the couple. Madam Loisel wasn’t at all impressed. In fact she petulantly threw it across the table. She was annoyed and embarrassed. She avoided going out to occasions because it was a struggle For her to find outfits for occasions such as these. Monsieur Loisel was distraught. As a graceful Man, he handed her......

Words: 278 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Necklace

...Kade Terry Eng 102- Tuesday March 19th, 2013 “The Necklace” In Guy De Mauppassant’s “The Necklace” Mathilde Loisel is a dynamic character throughout the whole story. She goes from rags to riches for one night. Then she becomes more conservative when she loses a priceless necklace. Last she finally takes responsibility for the lost necklace. Mathilde is a discontent woman in this story, because she wants to be rich like other people in town. She longs to be beautiful and popular while she is with her friends in town. She and her husband found out the hard way that lying doesn’t always pay off like most people thinks it will. Mathilde goes from rags to riches to attend a formal dinner party her husband is invited to. She lives in her fantasized world for one whole night. She manipulated her husband to give her four hundred francs so she could go purchase a very fancy dress. When she could not trick him in to giving her more money she borrows what she thinks is a very expensive and beautiful diamond necklace from a very rich friend of hers named, Mrs. Forrester. She made a trip over to her friend’s house to ask her if she could borrow some jewelry. She looked through every piece of jewelry Mrs. Forrester had until she found that priceless diamond necklace and when she did “her heart throbbed with desire for it. Her hands shook as she picked it up. She fastened it around her neck, watched it gleam around her neck, and looked at herself ecstatically” (pg202).......

Words: 762 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...The Necklace Summary How It All Goes Down At the beginning of the story, we meet Mathilde Loisel, a middle-class girl who desperately wishes she were wealthy. She's got looks and charm, but had the bad luck to be born into a family of clerks, who marry her to another clerk (M. Loisel) in the Department of Education. Mathilde is so convinced she's meant to be rich that she detests her real life and spends all day dreaming and despairing about the fabulous life she's not having. She envisions footmen, feasts, fancy furniture, and strings of rich young men to seduce. One day M. Loisel comes home with an invitation to a fancy ball thrown by his boss, the Minister of Education. M. Loisel has gone to a lot of trouble to get the invitation, but Mathilde's first reaction is to throw a fit. She doesn't have anything nice to wear, and can't possibly go! How dare her husband be so insensitive? M. Loisel doesn't know what to do, and offers to buy his wife a dress, so long as it's not too expensive. Mathilde asks for 400 francs, and he agrees. It's not too long before Mathilde throws another fit, though, this time because she has no jewels. So M. Loisel suggests she go see her friend Mme. Forestier, a rich woman who can probably lend her something. Mathilde goes to see Mme. Forestier, and she is in luck. Mathilde is able to borrow a gorgeous diamond necklace. With the necklace, she's sure to be a stunner. The night of the ball arrives, and Mathilde has the time of her life.......

Words: 2467 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...How does guy de Maupassant present the character Mathilde in ‘the necklace’? Guy de Maupassant was a French writer in the 19th century, he is considered as one of the fathers of the short story. The necklace is a short story about a woman called Madame Matilde loisel and her husband Charles. Mathilde appears to be an unpleasant middle class woman who believes she was made for a rich life. Madame Matilde Loisel is lucky enough to obtain invitations to the Ministry of the Public Instruction party; because she is middle class and cannot afford jewellery to wear she borrows a necklace from her good friend Madame Jeanne Forestier. But whilst coming home from the party she loses the necklace. This leads her to start a new life of poverty. Through the use of indirect discourse, Maupassant shows the reader Mathilde’s innermost thoughts, “she was one of those pretty, delightful girls who, apparently be some error of fate, get themselves born the daughters of very minor civil servants.” By doing this he draws her attention to her vanity and her self-centred nature, “if she had noticed the substitution, what would she have thought? What would she have said would she have not concluded she was a thief?” the effect of the free indirect discourse is highlighted by Maupassant use of hyperbole, “she was unhappy all the time…the rundown apartment they lived in… was torture to her. ”Maupassant uses tricolons and other forms of repetition to exaggerate Mathilde’s emotions, making her seem......

Words: 991 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...When reading a novel or a short story, the question on why the author creates particular characters will come to mind. There can be significant traits the character possesses that the reader should recognize automatically throughout the story. In other words, characters in a story are one of the main key points that help a reader fully understand the context that the author has written about. Characteristics throughout a story assist with painting the image inside the readers head on the time, surrounding, and appearance of a character. In the Necklace, by Guy De Maupassant character development is illustrated. Character development is an essential element that authors use throughout their stories to make the character become more realistic to their audience. There are several factors that make up the development of a character such as action, setting, and descriptions. Having these factors of character development identified while reading a story can make the text become more realistic to the readers eyes. A characters description is very important when developing a story. For an example, in the short story Sweat by Zora Neal Hurston, the protagonist Delia physical appearance is greatly expresses within the story. Hurston describes Delia as a southern African American washer woman who is so skinny that her legs resemble a chicken’s, and is physically drain from all the hard work she does around her house. Delia physical appearance is not beautiful, because she endures......

Words: 1383 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...Carie Pimenta English-113-02IN Instructor Roger Wooten 8 February 2015 Analysis of Mme. Loisel Mme. Loisel is the main character in a story called “The Necklace” written by Guy De Maupassant. Mme. Loisel is a woman unhappy with who she is and what she has in life, wanting and dreaming of more which cost her more that she could have ever imagined. The character of Mme. Loisel is that of a woman who feels as though she was born into a life she did not belong. She let herself be married to a little clerk her provided her with the essentials to live. Yes, she lived in poverty and instead of appreciating the simple things in life, like the roof over her head, the clothes she did have and the food on her table she was angry and wanted more. She wanted attention, to be envied and to have all the luxuries she thought she deserved. She had a friend who ended up with the things she thinks she deserves but does not see her because she gets too envious and suffers more after a visit with her. Her husband seems quite content with the life they live. Works hard but also knows his wife wants more. He came home one evening with a surprise she thought she would be thrilled with but got the opposite. He had tickets to go to a very big event at the palace that not many clerks are invited too. Instead of happiness she got upset worrying about what she would wear. Her husband then asks her what it will cost for a dress for the ball and it just so happens it is what he has......

Words: 938 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Necklace

...and borrow something from her. Madame Forestier agrees to lend Mathilde her jewels, and Mathilde selects a diamond necklace. She is overcome with gratitude at Madame Forestier’s generosity. At the party, Mathilde is the most beautiful woman in attendance, and everyone notices her. She is intoxicated by the attention and has an overwhelming sense of self-satisfaction. At 4 A.M., she finally looks for Monsieur Loisel, who has been dozing for hours in a deserted room. He cloaks her bare shoulders in a wrap and cautions her to wait inside, away from the cold night air, while he fetches a cab. But she is ashamed at the shabbiness of her wrap and follows Monsieur Loisel outside. They walk for a while before hailing a cab. When they finally return home, Mathilde is saddened that the night has ended. As she removes her wrap, she discovers that her necklace is no longer around her neck. In a panic, Monsieur Loisel goes outside and retraces their steps. Terrified, she sits and waits for him. He returns home much later in an even greater panic—he has not found the necklace. He instructs her to write to Madame Forestier and say that she has broken the clasp of the necklace and is getting it mended. They continue to look for the necklace. After a week, Monsieur Loisel says they have to see about replacing it. They visit many jewelers, searching for a similar necklace, and finally find one. It costs 40,000 francs, although the jeweler says he will give it to them for 36,000. The......

Words: 817 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Necklace

...The Necklace: The Lost Chapter The term butterfly effect means that a small change in one setting can have a larger impact somewhere else. On one Sunday afternoon, Madame Loisel went for a walk in the Champs Elysees to clear her thoughts after a long week of work. She was simply thinking how long ten years of paying debts distracted her from the possibility of children. Once the thought of children came to mind, “she suddenly perceived a woman who was leading a child. It was Madame Forestier, still young, still beautiful, and still charming (Maupassant 10).” How astonishing that Mathilde was thinking how differently her life would have been if she had not lost the necklace and had the chance to raise a child and there her eyes were led to Madame Forestier and her child. Mathilde decided she had nothing else to lose, so she decided to walk up to Madame Forestier to simply say hello. “Good-day, Jeanne (Maupassant 10).” Jeanne did not recognize Mathilde because Mathilde had aged greatly and looked worn like an old leather wallet about to fall apart. Mathilde explained to her good friend that it was because of her she had great poverty. Jeanne confused and almost offended asked: “I’m sorry; I don’t seem to understand how I am the cause of your hardship? The last time we saw each other everything seemed fine!” Mathilde then relayed the memory of returning the diamond necklace but that it was a substitute necklace. She told Jeanne she lost the original necklace at the......

Words: 1232 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Necklace

...English 385 The Necklace In that moment after Matilda realized what has happened she was in shock. She stood in the face of her friend with total rage in heart. She was angry and immediately demanded the necklace back. She begins yelling at Ms. Forestier that she has been in debt the last 10 years to replace that necklace and now she wants the necklace back. Matilda offers to give her the original value of 500 francs for the necklace if she will return the necklace. Ms. Forestier declines. She explains that the necklace is one of her prize possessions and cannot part with. Matilda has a hard time accepting her response and tells Ms. Foreister if she refuses to return the necklace she would be sorry. They depart, Matilda returns home to explain to her husband what occurred. As Loisel is home relaxing, from his hard days work, his wife rushes in total rage. He is unaware of what transpired with Ms. Foreister but notices the utter turmoil on Matilda’s face. HE begins to ask what’s wrong before he can complete the statement Matilda begins to yelling “ We have worked the last 10 years paying off the necklace and it is not even real. I demanded that it be returned and she refused”. Loisel is confused, and unsure how to respond. Matilda proceeds to explain that she ran in to Ms. Foreister today and she acted as if she didn’t recognize whom she was. They begin to talk and she explained how she lost the necklace and worked 10 years to replaced it for 10,000 fances. Ms.......

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Necklace

... For my comparison and contrast essay I am electing to use Mrs. Louise Mallard from Kate Chopin's "Story of an Hour"and Mrs. Mathilde Loisel from Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace". In my essay I am not only going to compare and contrast these two ladies but also explain each one of the characters backgrounds, actions, and their motivations as well as each of their settings. The story of an hour , is among other things, a reflection of the idea that marriage is confining and limiting for women. It is Louise's reaction to her husband's death, her new found freedom and renewed excitement about life that illustrates to the reader that her previous existence was one in which she had no freedom, no excitement, no interest in the uncertainties that lie ahead. There is also this sence that was unacceptable for her to feel this way. To have an interest in driving her own future or to have any kind of joy in being alone, or living for oneself. Mrs. Louise Mallard lives in an era were women obeyed their husbands and took care of the house. Kate Chopin is a feminist writer. In Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace", Mathilde Loisel is attractive and pretty,but unhappy, very unhappy. She believes that life has played her falsely. She feels relegated to a lower station than she deserves. She wanted to be appreciated and loved by some rich gentleman from a good family, but instead, having no dowry, she had to settle for a junior clerk in the Ministry of Public Instruction. Mathilde is so......

Words: 447 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Comparing “the Story of an Hour” and “the Necklace”

...Comparing “The Story of an Hour” and “The Necklace” Short stories are always very enjoyable to read. They are very concise but mostly have such a deep message resonating throughout the text that the reader is left pondering over an extension of the story to imagine the possible ending if they were novels instead. The works under consideration are meant to be compared because of their unique theme which reflects how two authors can write similar yet distinctive stories in different times. Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” and “The Necklace” by Guy De Maupassant are two such short stories whose themes center around role of gender and marriage with special focus on the female characters. Even though there are similarities, there are also differences which I plan on discussing in more detail, differences such as the two female characters one experiences death while the other a lesson from life. “The Story of an Hour” revolves around the female character Louise Mallard who has been gently told that her husband died in a railroad disaster, news which Richard, her husband’s friend learnt from somewhere. Since Mrs. Mallard is a heart patient she feels very depressed and seeks to sit in solitude as she learns about her husband Brently’s death. As the story unfolds one learns that Louise Mallard is in fact more “free” and utters the word repeatedly as she realizes that she will be independent from this time onwards. She fantasizes her freedom staring blankly out the window......

Words: 1626 - Pages: 7