Free Essay

Samaritan

In: English and Literature

Submitted By xTnTGamerx
Words 367
Pages 2
The Man DO WE LOOK AND PASS BY ON TO THE OTHER SIDE?
Luke 10:25-37

Introduction
A crowd had gathered to listen to Jesus as He taught. A man who was a law professor, one skilled in religious dogmas of Jesus own tradition, a kind of "Ph.D." in rabbinical studies, stood up to ask a question. The crowd was no doubt, stunned to silence, for it seemed that a real confrontation had begun. A crowd likes a confrontation. Jesus, the barefooted son of a carpenter, on the one side and this Rabbinical expert, with his scholar's shawl draped over his shoulder, on the other. The question is asked. vs.25. (Discuss & read through vs. 28) He pressed further vs. 29.
Jesus said, vs. 30. A certain man

He wouldn't give away the identity of the man's
*tribe *his social class
*his race *his dialect or even
*his clan *the language He spoke

We don't need to know any of that. Why do we need footnotes of him? Jesus left all that information out! A certain man .. Could have been anyone on this Jericho road.

The journey was 17 dangerous miles through lonely rocky, rough desert. And it's still 17 lonely miles. Robbers & muggers were known to attack travelers. They stripped him.
1. We cannot identify him by his clothes
2. We can't tell anything by the cut of his garments, the depth of the border, the hem of he cloth, or the color of the cloth.
3. We can't tell whether he was a poor man with a cheaply woven piece of cloth or a rich man with a cloth of smooth purple and a deep hem.
4. We don't have the advantage of getting our prejudices working. A certain man.
He was naked so there was no clue of his status. He was unconscious so we can't hear his accent
Tomato
Children
Madame
So since he was without clothes and without consciousness, we can't tell who was lying there. Jesus fixed it that way.
No special class or race, just a human being in need, half dead, beaten and robbed. We don't know how well educated he was or how poor he ...…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Position of the Rescuer and Good Samaritan Liability in Irish Tort Law

...its origins from the 2009 Law Reform Commission consultation paper which essentially outlined a framework for the drafting of legislation. Furthermore analysing case law and statue from our jurisdiction and abroad, which was applied in the only real substantive case in Ireland to date, O’Neill v Dunnes Stores Ltd To determine the position of the rescuer in Ireland several factors were considered by the LRC such as the moral versus legal question of a duty to intervene, how intervention affects society and with an increasing level of litigation in modern Ireland, how the courts should view subsequent cases for and against Good Samaritans and Voluntary organisations. LRC Consultation Paper The recognition and protection of persons providing voluntary assistance has been addressed by the LRC Consultation Paper on Civil Liability of Good Samaritans and Volunteers, which proposes the introduction of a statute restricting the liability of such persons who intervene as rescuers. The recommendations in the paper essentially aimed to clarify the confusing position of rescuers in Ireland through the implementation of statute. Section 5.01 of the recommendations states “The Commission recommends that there should be no reform of the law to impose a duty on citizens in general” Historically, common law countries have hesitated to a positive duty to intervene, McMahon and Binchy note that common law has been completely opposed to the imposition of affirmative duties, in......

Words: 2468 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Good Samaritan Act

...Good Samaritan Act Colorado/Louisiana LaNita D. Scott Afternoon Class February 28, 2013 Good Samaritan Act Colorado/Louisiana The Good Samaritan Act is legal terms in which refers to individuals who in good faith, volunteer to help other individuals in need of medical attention. In return the person giving the help must be responsibly with the injured person life. Each state offer good Samaritans immunity for assisting. For those good Samaritans who negligent cause the injured person more injures they could be held liable for any civil damages. There are individuals in this world that try and help others every day. Then there are others who will not help due to the fact that they are afraid to get into trouble because of these laws. There are several states that have adopted the Good Samaritan Act. Colorado and Louisiana are two that have established these laws within their state. In Louisiana, if an emergency medical technician give their service to help another individual out during an emergency situation and do not arrange for further medical treatment will be liable for any civil damage. Colorado also states, that if a licensed physician and surgeon renders help and it leads up to negligent on the patient, that individual rending the services will be held liable only if that patient is not obligated to be covered by him or her. Louisiana holds everyone liable for their actions no matter what. Whereas, Colorado only hold the individual who is the Good Samaritan ......

Words: 348 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Good Samaritan Law

...| Good Samaritan Law Definition - A Good Samaritan in legal terms refers to someone who renders aid in an emergency to an injured person on a voluntary basis. What Is The Good Samaritan Law The "Good Samaritan Law" is the legal term that refers to someone who renders aid in an emergency to an injured person on a voluntary basis. The Good Samaritan laws offers legal protection to the person that gives reasonable assistance to another person who is injured, ill, or otherwise incapacitated. They made this law to encourage people to offer assistance without the fear of being sued or prosecuted for unintentional injury or wrongful death (Good Samaritan law, 2009). Most overdoses occur in the presence of other people and take several hours to cause death. However, research finds that in up to half of cases, no one calls for help.  911 calls are also often delayed as witnesses try ineffective methods of reviving people such as slapping them or dousing them with cold water.  The most common reason given for not calling 911 or for delaying help seeking is fear of arrest and prosecution (Szalavitz, 2011). Who Does It Protected Most of the Good Samaritan laws are specifically made for the public and each law protects different individuals. A person will be protected under the Good Samaritan laws as long as he or she has good intentions to aid the victim to the best of his or her ability during a medical emergency.  Under some Good Samaritan Laws, as long as......

Words: 1755 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Mitchell V Lovington Good Samaritan

...be a nurses aide, by the Good Samaritan Center located in Lovington, New Mexico. While working at the Good Samaritan center, Mitchell was given additional duties of handing out medications. There started to be issues with Mitchell not following the dress code, singing and not wanting to hand out medications. Mrs. Mitchell (appellee) was terminated on June 4, 1974 from Lovington Good Samaritan Center, INC. for alleged misconduct. June 12, 1974 Mrs. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits and was denied her benefits. July 24 1974, Mrs. Mitchell applied for an appeal. The issue of this case is whether the petitioner’s actions constituted misconduct if so as to disqualify her from certain unemployment compensation benefits. Under s 59-9-5(b), N.M.S.A.1953 The term “misconduct” is not defined in unemployment law for New Mexico. New Mexico adopted Wisconsin's 259-60,296 N.W. 636, 640 (1941) term for “misconduct”. The final decision was to reinstate Mitchells Commission due to the fact that her conduct was never severe enough to utilize the “last straw” doctrine. Using the “last straw” method an employer can rely on the doctrine for terminating an employee, where the termination is justified by a series of incidents of poor performance, followed by a final incident showing a blatant disregard for the employer's interests. In this case the Source: Kaplan University PA205 Unit 3 assignment case Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan center Inc.,1976 Mitchell......

Words: 264 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mitchell V. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, 555 Nm P.2d 696 (1976)

...Unit 4 Introduction to Legal Analysis and Writing Kaplan University PA 205 Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, 555 NM P.2d 696 (1976) Facts: This case was a reversed decision by District Court, Bernalillo County, awarding unemployment benefits to a discharged employee.  The denial of benefits was due to employee’s misconduct of insubordination, improper attire, name calling and other employee misconduct that disqualified the employee for unemployment benefits. Issue: Did the employer’s action constitute misconduct under s 59-9-5(b), N.M.S.A.1953? Rules: Was there misconduct by the plaintiff and was there cause for disqualification of benefits under. Analysis: After looking at the case, it had appeared that there were many misconduct write ups on Ms. Mitchell and many instances where other employees were mentioned, such as on April 2, 1974, where there was a uniform issue where Ms. Mitchell was not dressed properly. May 24, 1974 Mary Stroope, Carol Skurlock where a comment of race was brought up by Ms. Mitchell about a work assignment. May 15, 1974, and other days where Ms. Mitchell was singing and a complaint by Ms. Betty Clarke, RN. Conclusion: The district court is reversed and the decision of the Commission is reinstated. Analogizing and Distinguishing: The similarities of this case and my client case are they are both Unemployment compensation cases that involve misconduct at the work place where disrespect to co workers is......

Words: 1010 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Mitchell V. Lovington Good Samaritan Center Inc.

...Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center Inc. Supreme Court of New Mexico 555 P.2D 696. FACTS Plaintiff-appallee represented by Gary J. Martone, J. Richard Baumgartner, and Joseph Goldberg, Albuquerque. Defendant-appellant represented by Heidel, Samberson, Gallini & Williams, Jerry L. Williams, Lonvington. This appeal comes from the Bernalillo County District Court where the court reversed a decision of the Unemployment Security Commission and awarded benefits to a discharged employee. The ruling of the court is being appealed by the defendant. ISSUE Whether Mrs. Mitchell’s actions constitute as misconduct thereby disqualifying her from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. RULE The New Mexico Supreme Court adopted the definition of misconduct from the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck, 237 Wis. 249, 259-60, 296 N.W. 636.640 (1941) … “misconduct” … is limited to conduct evincing such willful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employee, or in carelessness or negligence of such degree or recurrence as to manifest equal culpability, wrongful intent or evil design or to show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interests or of the employee’s duties and obligations to his employer. On the other hand mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct, failure in good performance as the......

Words: 378 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Samaritan Law - Uk

...A Good Samaritan law is a law which compels a person to act for another if they are ill, in harm or other peril. The UK is one of the few European countries that have not criminalised failure to act, but instead the courts and some statutes have provided situations whereby liability will be imposed for a failure to act, or an ‘omission’. This assignment will discuss these circumstances and analyse why they exist. The law of England and Wales states that for someone to be found guilty of an offence there are two elements which must be found; these are actus reus and mens rea. Actus reus is a criminal act, and coupled with mens rea, ‘the guilty mind’, liability can often be imposed. However actus reus, deceivingly, does not have to be an ‘act’. There are certain circumstances where a failure to act, or an ‘omission’, is enough to place criminal liability. The general rule in English criminal law is that an omission will not result in criminal liability, for example if a by-passer witnesses someone being stabbed, but does not intervene, then the victim dies, they will not be liable, even though they may have reasonably been able to help. This is because there is no ‘constructed situation’ where it says there is a duty to act. However, there are certain situations where liability will be found, because it is expressed in statute, this is called direct liability; where a statute specifically states that there is a duty to act; for example the Road Traffic Act 1988 s.6 which......

Words: 2244 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

World Religions

...James version it was like Yoda was talking, or like reading Shakespeare. In the Living Bible it was much easier for me to understand it was written like how we speak now. When the Samaritan gave the inn keeper money the King James version used the word pence where as the Living Bible used the terminology of two 20 dollar bills. I feel that the Living Bible makes more sense for me to understand. What is the historical context of the story. In other words, why is it important that the hero of the story is a Samaritan (who is a Samaritan?)
 The historical context of the story is to teach people how to be a Christian or how to be more Christ like in their ways, and to follow moses' law. I think it was so important that the hero of the story was a Samaritan because, of the history and the dislike or as the bible describes it despising each other between Jews and Samaritans. It was a Jew that got beat up and left on the side of the road for death, when a Jewish priest walked by and ignored the man. Then a Levite (a Jewish temple assistant) walked by and ignored him to. It was then that the Samaritan walked by picked up the man brought him to an inn and nursed him throughout the night and paid the inn keeper to look after him and said if it wasn't enough money that he would pay the inn keeper back. Samaritans today are a religious group they are located in Palestine. They believe they are descendents of the people who lived in Samaria, which is the centre of the Northern......

Words: 743 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Zelma M. Mitchell, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 10847.Oct. 27, 1976.

... v. LOVINGTON GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 10847.Oct. 27, 1976. Facts:  After being terminated from Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc., Petitioner Zelma Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits, but was denied by the Unemployment Security Commission due to the nature of her termination, pursuant to § 59-9-6(B), N.M.S.A.1953. Issue:  The issue is to determine whether Mrs. Mitchell’s actions constituted misconduct under § 59-9-5(b), N.M.S.A. 1953 and whether these actions were enough to warrant denial of unemployment compensation benefits. Rule: Though the term ‘misconduct’ is not defined in the Unemployment Compensation Law, the Supreme Court of New Mexico adopts the definition used by The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck, 237 Wis. 249, 259-60, 296 N.W. 636, 640 (1941). Application:  Based on the newly adopted definition of misconduct, the court holds that Mrs. Mitchell’s inappropriate attire, insubordination, and name calling display unruly conduct and lack of regard for the Center. Conclusion:  The Supreme Court reverses the decision of the district court and reinstates the decision of the Commission, holding that the employee’s misconduct justifies denying unemployment benefits. Table of Authorities Cases Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck, 237 Wis. 249, 259-60, 296 N.W. 636, 640 (1941) 2 Zelma M. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOVINGTON GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER, INC.,......

Words: 262 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Mother

...Mother Teresa How effectively has Mother Teresa demonstrated the possibilities of living the kingdom values of love, compassion and faith in the parable of the Good Samaritan? Quote By Mother Teresa: “There is always the danger that we may just do the work for the sake of the work. This is where the respect and the love and the devotion come in - that we do it to God, to Christ, and that's why we try to do it as beautifully as possible.” – Mother Teresa Biography: Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu, also known as Mother Teresa, was the third and final child born to her Albanian Catholic parents, Nikola and Dranafile Bojaxhiu, in the city of Skopje on August 26th 1910. When Mother Teresa was eight years old her father died suddenly and it left the family devastated. After her father died, Teresa’s family held their religious beliefs tightly and strongly. When mother Teresa was 12 years old she heard call from God to serve God as a nun this meant that giving up all her worldly possessions and her family possibly forever. She thought about if she should be a nun to serve God for five years, during this time she did many religious activities such as singing in the church choir, helped her mother organise church events, and went on walks with her mother to hand out food and supplies to the poor. Finally after 5 long years she accepted to serve God as nun when she was 17 years old. At this time she as read many articles about the work of catholic missionaries in India......

Words: 1365 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Day in the Life Healthcare 'Good Samaritan Case'

... Criminal law is a system of law concerned with the punishment of those who committed the crimes. I believe in the Good Samaritan Case it is both a criminal and civil case. The case is criminal and civil case. The case is criminal because Broitzman and Larson where both charged for the crimes they committed. This case is also a civil law case because being a nursing home the actions of the girls charged also effected the community in more than just a criminal way. The residents of the nursing home had family members in and they themselves where members of the community. 2.What intentional torts do you think the nursing aides committed? Please give a definition for each intentional tort that you choose with an explination of why you chose that tort. The intentional tort Assault and Battery is the only one that seems to apply. As defined Assault is the threaten of harm, while battery is the actual harm to a person. The girls Broitzman and Larson both got charged with criminal abuse charges. Abuse falls under Assault and Battery with the actual harm to a person. The girls both recieved multiple counts of Abuse due to it being towards more than one resident in the nursing home. 3. Who is ultimately responsible for the supervision of hte nursing aides in this case? Define and identify the doctrine which could be used to find them liable. The Good Samaritan Society is being held responsible in a docrtrine of respondant superior meaning let the master answer. The young women......

Words: 629 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Cool

...caring is,’The Good Samaritan’. The parable tells of a man traveling from Jerusalem to Jericho, and while on the way he is robbed of everything he had, including his clothing, and is beaten to within an inch of his life. That road was treachorously winding and was a favorite hideout of robbers and thieves. He spends no time describing the priest and only tells of how he showed no love or compassion for the man by failing to help him and passing on the other side of the road so as not to get involved. If there was anyone who would have known God’s law of love, it would have been the priest. By nature of his position, he was to be a person of compassion, desiring to help others. Unfortunately, “love” was not a word for him that required action on the behalf of someone else. The next person to pass by in the Parable of the Good Samaritan is a Levite, and he does exactly what the priest did: he passes by without showing any compassion. Again, he would have known the law, but he also failed to show the injured man compassion.The next person to come by is the Samaritan, the one least likely to have shown compassion for the man. Samaritans were considered a low class of people by the Jews since they had intermarried with non-Jews and did not keep all the law. Therefore, Jews would have nothing to do with them. We do not know if the injured man was a Jew or Gentile, but it made no difference to the Samaritan; he did not consider the man’s race or religion. The “Good Samaritan” saw......

Words: 1329 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Zelma M. Mitchell, Appellant, V. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc.,

...Unit 3: Legal Analysis and Writing PA-205 Shannon R. Courson Kaplan University 11/28/15   ZELMA M. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. LOVINGTON GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER, INC., Appellee. No. 10847. SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 89 NM 575,555 P. 2d 696 (1976) October 27, 1976, Decided Attorney for the defendant-appellant: Heidel, Samberson, Gallini & Williams, Jerry L. Williams, Lovingto Attorney for the plaintiff-appellee: Gary J. Martone, J. Richard Baumgartner, Joseph Goldberg, Albuquerque Opinion by: Justice Sosa Facts: Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc. employed Zelma M. Mitchell on July 4, 1972 in the position of Nurse Aide. After one year of employment with no noted reprimands, additional duties as a relief medications nurse were assigned two days per week. The plaintiff came to work on April 2, 1974, during a Federal inspection, out of uniform. She refused to go home and change, after asked to do so. The following day, the plaintiff arrived at work out of uniform again. On this occasion, she did go home to change after asked to do so. According to Betty Clarke, R.N., on May 15, 1972, in addition to other days, the plaintiff was obstinate and sang while dispensing medications. Clarke reported this behavior to Charge Nurse Stroope. On May 24, 1974, the plaintiff refused to give out medications as instructed by Ms. Stroope. The plaintiff made insulting remarks about the Nurse Aide, Carol Scurlock and Ms. Stroope on that day. Between May 24, 1974 and June 4, 1974,......

Words: 650 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Mitchell V. Lovington Good Samaritan

...Plaintiff (Mrs. Mitchell) was terminated from her job at Lovington good Samaritan Center, Inc., due to alleged misconduct. Plaintiff then filed for unemployment compensation benefits. Due to the finding from the deputy of the Unemployment Security Commission Mrs. Mitchell was denied benefits for seven weeks. Plaintiff appealed the decision and was granted her money. The Unemployment center appealed that ruling and the first ruling went back into effect. Mrs. Mitchell appealed that ruling applied for and was granted certiorari from the decision. The Plaintiff’s money was reinstated to her by the District Court. Mrs. Mitchell was terminated from her job on June 4, 1974. On April 2 and April 3, 1974, Plaintiff went to work out of uniform. The first day she was told to go home and change she refused to do so, however, on the second day she did as she was told. Then on May 15, 1974, the plaintiff was singing while working, it was reported as unethical and time- consuming. Another incident happened on May 24, 1974. Mrs. Mitchell was told to change from medications to the floor routine. She was told why she was being switched but she was not co-operative. From that day unit June 4, 1974 Mrs. Mitchell refused to do her job. On June 4, 1974 Mrs. Mitchell went to work on time, and started filling out her time card. She filled it out for the whole hour shift. When a supervisor asked her about it she told him she was planning on working all 8 hours. He said something else and she......

Words: 307 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Good Samaritan

...The Good Samaritan Sometimes in life you will meet someone who is in need of your help. In some cases you might not even know the person; you just happen to be the one in a million who is at the right place at the right time. Most likely you will try to figure out at once how you might possibly be able to help the person in need. Concerning the level of the needed help you will find the answer more or less simple, but nonetheless it is quite a decision to let someone into your life in order to help them. Your decision may be influenced by your principles, moral and conscience, and in some cases you know that whatever you decide to do the decision will probably affect somebody’s life for ages if not the rest of their life. Steward Dunlop’s short-story “The Good Samaritan” takes up the theme of being helpful to a person in need as the narrator finds herself in this particular kind of situation when she meets Laylor in a lavatory of the National Portrait Gallery. She is a Londoner. This being the first thing she tells about herself means that obviously it is a rather central part of her character. By stamping herself as a characteristic Londoner she implies that she is quite withdrawn from her surroundings: “I am not in the habit of making friends of strangers. I’m a Londoner. Not even little grey-haired old ladies passing comment on the weather can shame a response from me. I’m a Londoner – aloof sweats from my pores.” (p.1 l.l.1-3) She even repeats that she is a Londoner to......

Words: 1163 - Pages: 5