Free Essay


In: Science

Submitted By hitmanintown
Words 1287
Pages 6
he multiverse (or meta-universe, metaverse) is the hypothetical set of multiple possible universes (including the historical universe we consistently experience) that together comprise everything that exists and can exist: the entirety of space, time, matter, and energy as well as the physical laws and constants that describe them. The term was coined in 1895 by the American philosopher and psychologist William James.[1] The various universes within the multiverse are sometimes called parallel universes.

The structure of the multiverse, the nature of each universe within it and the relationship between the various constituent universes, depend on the specific multiverse hypothesis considered. Multiverses have been hypothesized in cosmology, physics, astronomy, religion, philosophy, transpersonal psychology and fiction, particularly in science fiction and fantasy. In these contexts, parallel universes are also called "alternative universes", "quantum universes", "interpenetrating dimensions", "parallel dimensions", "parallel worlds", "alternative realities", "alternative timelines", and "dimensional planes," among others.

Tegmark's classification

Cosmologist Max Tegmark has provided a taxonomy of universes beyond the familiar observable universe. The levels according to Tegmark's classification are arranged such that subsequent levels can be understood to encompass and expand upon previous levels, and they are briefly described below.

Level I: Beyond our cosmological horizon

A generic prediction of chaotic inflation is an infinite ergodic universe, which, being infinite, must contain Hubble volumes realizing all initial conditions.

Accordingly, an infinite universe will contain an infinite number of Hubble volumes, all having the same physical laws and physical constants. In regard to configurations such as the distribution of matter, almost all will differ from our Hubble volume. However, because there are infinitely many, far beyond the cosmological horizon, there will eventually be Hubble volumes with similar, and even identical, configurations. Tegmark estimates that an identical volume to ours should be about 1010115 meters away from us.[4][5] This estimate implies use of the cosmological principle, wherein one assumes our Hubble volume is not special or unique. By extension of the same reasoning, there would, in fact, be an infinite number of Hubble volumes identical to ours in the universe.

Level II: Universes with different physical constants

In the chaotic inflation theory, a variant of the cosmic inflation theory, the multiverse as a whole is stretching and will continue doing so forever, but some regions of space stop stretching and form distinct bubbles, like gas pockets in a loaf of rising bread. Such bubbles are embryonic level I multiverses. Linde and Vanchurin calculated the number of these universes to be on the scale of 101010,000,000.[6]

Different bubbles may experience different spontaneous symmetry breaking resulting in different properties such as different physical constants.[4]

This level also includes John Archibald Wheeler's oscillatory universe theory and Lee Smolin's fecund universes theory.

Level III: Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics

Hugh Everett's many-worlds interpretation (MWI) is one of several mainstream interpretations of quantum mechanics. In brief, one aspect of quantum mechanics is that certain observations cannot be predicted absolutely. Instead, there is a range of possible observations, each with a different probability. According to the MWI, each of these possible observations corresponds to a different universe. Suppose a die is thrown that contains six sides and that the numeric result of the throw corresponds to a quantum mechanics observable. All six possible ways the die can fall correspond to six different universes. (More correctly, in MWI there is only a single universe but after the "split" into "many worlds" these cannot in general interact.)[7] Tegmark argues that a level III multiverse does not contain more possibilities in the Hubble volume than a level I-II multiverse. In effect, all the different "worlds" created by "splits" in a level III multiverse with the same physical constants can be found in some Hubble volume in a level I multiverse. Tegmark writes that "The only difference between Level I and Level III is where your doppelgängers reside. In Level I they live elsewhere in good old three-dimensional space. In Level III they live on another quantum branch in infinite-dimensional Hilbert space." Similarly, all level II bubble universes with different physical constants can in effect be found as "worlds" created by "splits" at the moment of spontaneous symmetry breaking in a level III multiverse.[4]

Level IV: Ultimate Ensemble

The Ultimate Ensemble is the hypothesis of Tegmark himself. This level considers equally real all universes that can be described by different mathematical structures. Tegmark writes that "abstract mathematics is so general that any Theory Of Everything (TOE) that is definable in purely formal terms (independent of vague human terminology) is also a mathematical structure. For instance, a TOE involving a set of different types of entities (denoted by words, say) and relations between them (denoted by additional words) is nothing but what mathematicians call a set-theoretical model, and one can generally find a formal system that it is a model of." He argues this "implies that any conceivable parallel universe theory can be described at Level IV" and "subsumes all other ensembles, therefore brings closure to the hierarchy of multiverses, and there cannot be say a Level V."[8]

Jürgen Schmidhuber, however, says the "set of mathematical structures" is not even well-defined, and admits only universe representations describable by constructive mathematics, that is, computer programs. He explicitly includes universe representations describable by non-halting programs whose output bits converge after finite time, although the convergence time itself may not be predictable by a halting program, due to Kurt Gödel's limitations.[9][10][11] He also explicitly discusses the more restricted ensemble of quickly computable universes.[12]

Cyclic theories
Main article: Cyclic model

In several theories there is a series of infinite, self-sustaining cycles (for example: an eternity of Big Bang-Big crunches).
See also: Introduction to M-theory, M-theory, Brane cosmology, and String theory landscape

A multiverse of a somewhat different kind has been envisaged within the multi-dimensional extension of string theory known as M-theory, also known as Membrane Theory.[13] In M-theory our universe and others are created by collisions between p-branes in a space with 11 and 26 dimensions (the number of dimensions depends on the chirality of the observer);[14][15] each universe takes the form of a D-brane.[14][15] Objects in each universe are essentially confined to the D-brane of their universe, but may be able to interact with other universes via gravity, a force which is not restricted to D-branes.[16] This is unlike the universes in the "quantum multiverse", but both concepts can operate at the same time.
Anthropic principle
Main article: Anthropic principle

The concept of other universes has been proposed to explain how our Universe appears to be fine-tuned for conscious life as we experience it. If there were a large (possibly infinite) number of universes, each with possibly different physical laws (or different fundamental physical constants), some of these universes, even if very few, would have the combination of laws and fundamental parameters that are suitable for the development of matter, astronomical structures, elemental diversity, stars, and planets that can exist long enough for life to emerge and evolve. The weak anthropic principle could then be applied to conclude that we (as conscious beings) would only exist in one those few universes that happened to be finely tuned, permitting the existence of life with developed consciousness. Thus, while the probability might be extremely small that any particular universe would have the requisite conditions for life (as we understand life) to emerge and evolve, this does not require intelligent design per the teleological argument as the only explanation for the conditions in the Universe that promote our existence in it.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay


...way beyond the Earth, the Milky Way and other distant galaxies, we may find that our universe is not the only universe, but is instead part of a vast complex of universes that we call the multiverse. Now the idea of a multiverse is a strange one. I mean, most of us were raised to believe that the word "universe" means everything. And I say most of us with forethought, as my four-year-old daughter has heard me speak of these ideas since she was born. And last year I was holding her and I said, "Sophia, I love you more than anything in the universe." And she turned to me and said, "Daddy, universe or multiverse?" (Laughter) But barring such an anomalous upbringing, it is strange to imagine other realms separate from ours, most with fundamentally different features, that would rightly be called universes of their own. And yet, speculative though the idea surely is, I aim to convince you that there's reason for taking it seriously, as it just might be right. I'm going to tell the story of the multiverse in three parts. In part one, I'm going to describe those Nobel Prize-winning results and to highlight a profound mystery which those results revealed. In part two, I'll offer a solution to that mystery. It's based on an approach called string theory, and that's where the idea of the multiverse will come into the story. Finally, in part three, I'm going to describe a cosmological theory called inflation, which will pull all the pieces of the story together. Okay, part one starts...

Words: 3198 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

String Theory

...studying the way the Universe behaves, how it began, and how it will all eventually end. There is way to much to learn about the universe in one’s lifetime, but knowledge and technology has helped us come a long way to find out exactly what the word universe actually means, and how fathomable it truly is. The Multiverse theory for the universe has been a recently accepted theory that describes the continuous formation of universes through the collapse of giant stars and the formation of black holes.  With each of these black holes there is a new point and a new possible universe.  Each universe starts with its own big bang, acquires a very “one of a kind” imprint (and its individual physical laws) as it cools, and maps out its own cycle.  The big bang that triggered our entire universe is, in this grander perspective, an infinite part of an elaborate structure that extends far beyond the range of any telescopes."  (Rees 3)  This puts our place in the Multiverse into a small spectrum.  While the size of the earth in relation to the sun is minuscule, the size of the sun, the solar system, the galaxy, and even the universe, could pale in comparison to this proposed Multiverse.  It would be a shift in thinking that may help explain our big bang theory and possibly give light to the idea of parallel universes. M-Theory proposes an 11th dimension that mathematically rids the theory of any further anomalies. In this 11th dimension a string could acquire enough energy to expand......

Words: 1051 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...pproaches to interpreting quantum theory have been further explored and developed,[7][8][9] becoming quite popular. MWI is one of many multiverse hypotheses in physics and philosophy. It is currently considered a mainstream interpretation along with the other decoherence interpretations, the Copenhagen interpretation,[10] and deterministic interpretations such as the Bohmian mechanics. Before many-worlds, reality had always been viewed as a single unfolding history. Many-worlds, however, views reality as a many-branched tree, wherein every possible quantum outcome is realised.[11] Many-worlds claims to reconcile the observation of non-deterministic events, such as the random radioactive decay, with the fully deterministic equations of quantum physics. In many-worlds, the subjective appearance of wavefunction collapse is explained by the mechanism of quantum decoherence, which resolves all of the correlation paradoxes of quantum theory, such as the EPR paradox[12][13] and Schrödinger's cat,[1] since every possible outcome of every event defines or exists in its own "history" or "world". In lay terms, the hypothesis states there is a very large–perhaps infinite[14]–number of universes, and everything that could possibly have happened in our past, but did not, has occurred in the past of some other universe or universes. Quantum mechanics Introduction Glossary · History Background Bra–ket notation Classical mechanics Hamiltonian Interference Old quantum theory Fundamental......

Words: 381 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

An Argument for Design

...mighty Grand Canyon, or even to the peak of Mt. Fuji there is an immense amount of things on this Earth that are so incredible it is hard to believe science and chance created these magnificent things. So what is the best explanation for these occurrences? I believe that these occurrences scream of an intelligent designer which also leads us to the existence of God. First I must explain what an argument for design is and then we will look at Paley’s Watchmaker Theory to give us better insight on this argument. Then I will point to Betty and Cordell’s argument that the things of our universe lead us to a belief in God (intelligent designer) and that the Big Bang theory is not the best explanation alone for the existence of God, and that a multiverse is not the best explanation for the existences in our universe. Design arguments most often try to explain the existence of God by pointing to various occurrences and objects within our world and universe that lead us to believe that there is an intelligent designer. According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, design arguments usually consist of three premises. One is a premise that asserts that the material universe exhibits some verifiable property (F); Two is a premise that asserts that (F) is persuasive evidence of intelligent design or purpose; Three concludes that the best or most probable explanation that the material universe exhibits (F) is that there exist an intelligent designer who intentionally brought it......

Words: 1800 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Dc Comics

...concerning things that we encounter in everyday circumstances. Questions like “What are the presuppositions of this statement?” were asked on a regular basis. One of the most interesting discussions in the class was the topic of the multiverse concept, a reality consisting of more than a single “reality”. Discussion of this topic immediately led to another topic in which the multiverse concept had been used: the world of superheroes found in comic books. As the class had trained us to do, questions began to surface, questions concerning the stories of these superheroes that have become an important piece of our culture. Of course, the stories are fictitious, and the purpose was not to test the stories as you would test a true scientific theory. The main focus of this research was on the message of the stories, what ideas and concepts did Gallego 2 they communicate? It would have been unreasonable to sift through vast collection of series published throughout the years, so the content analyzed was narrowed down to the main story arcs of “Crisis on Infinite Earths”, “Infinite Crisis”, “Trinity War”, “Forever Evil” and a few other relevant storylines. The major reasons for the selection of titles were the facts that 1) The first two dealt with the multiverse concept and 2) these titles are perhaps the most inclusive of the DC storylines, involving the majority of the characters in the DC universe. Throughout the research, many themes were presented, yet two messages were......

Words: 3545 - Pages: 15

Free Essay


...Observations of supernovae have shown that the Universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.[10] There are many competing theories about the ultimate fate of the universe. Physicists remain unsure about what, if anything, preceded the Big Bang. Many refuse to speculate, doubting that any information from any such prior state could ever be accessible. There are various multiverse hypotheses, in which some physicists have suggested that the Universe might be one among many or even an infinite number of universes that likewise exist.[11][12] Contents [hide] 1 Historical observation 2 History 3 Etymology, synonyms and definitions o o o o • 3.1 Broadest definition: reality and probability 3.2 Definition as reality 3.3 Definition as connected space-time 3.4 Definition as observable reality • • • 4 Size, age, contents, structure, and laws o 4.1 Fine tuning • 5 Historical models o o o 5.1 Creation 5.2 Philosophical models 5.3 Astronomical models • 6 Theoretical models o o o o o 6.1 General theory of relativity 6.2 Special relativity and space-time 6.3 Solving Einstein's field equations 6.4 Big Bang model 6.5 Multiverse theory • • • • • • 7 Shape of the Universe 8 See also 9 Notes and references 10 Bibliography 11 Further reading 12 External links o 12.1 Videos Historical observation Hubble eXtreme Deep Field (XDF) XDF size compared to the size of the Moon – several thousandgalaxies, each consisting of billions of stars, are in this small view. XDF......

Words: 12085 - Pages: 49

Free Essay

Philo of Religion Reflection Paper

...Sigrid N. Cubil BSA-4A January 19, 2014 Carl Sagan, in his book Cosmos, said that the eagerness to understand the world already existed in the hearts of our ancestors, long before we were born into this world. However, the proper method of how to go about it was missing back then. This method, found today, has come to be known as science. And as I begin to philosophize about the existence of God, I wish to come to a conclusion where science and faith could truly reconcile. It would be best to start at the penultimate beginning, the origin of everything. Where did it all start? Different theories abound about the source of the universe (if there truly is only one of it): string theory, no boundaries theory, multiverse theory, alien theory and the most famous of them all, the Big Bang theory. Despite the debates over these theories, it just amazes me how the first day of God’s creation coincides with the explosion articulated in the Big Bang. Somehow, in a stream of light and energy, the universe was created. This awesome and hidden cosmic order that the universe is built upon and governed by, suggests an intelligent designer behind it all. This mystery still baffles scientists who believe that the law of physics can explain everything. But then again, these laws of physics could have come from God himself, relinquishing the idea of purely naturalistic possibilities. It is majestic that the universe is fine-tuned in every way to make it sustainable for life.......

Words: 755 - Pages: 4

Free Essay


...Mysteries of the Multiverse Name: Assif Khan Student no: Subject: PCS-181 The term multiverse has many nicknames including but not limited to quantum universes, alternate universes, alternate realities etc. But, what is the multiverse? If one was to look up the meaning of the word, the definition that is provided in the Oxford Dictionary states “a hypothetical space or realm consisting of a number of universes, of which our own universe is only one”1. The use of the term multiverse or its other moniker parallel universe, has been used in cosmology, physics, and philosophy to perhaps more prominently in science-fiction literature and movies for decades. Ever since Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe is expanding in the 1920s, there have been questions regarding the possibility of there being more than one universe. However, there has been no evidence to support the existence of multiverse. Interestingly, despite us humans being inherently logical beings, we still entertain the notion of multiverse which someone has yet to discover or observe. Why should the notion of having more than one universe than our own be any more valid than other scientific idiosyncrasies? As it turns out, the existence of parallel universes was not readily acceptable to physicists either. However, Eternal Inflations theory, String theory; which predicts the possibility of the existence of more than trillions of universes within multiverse as well as there being more than three......

Words: 1339 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Multiverse ♥

...Maybe In Another Universe, I Deserve You Gaby Dunn What if, in another universe, I deserve you? Hear me out. There’s this philosopher from the 1890s named William James, and he coined this theory about “the multiverse” which suggests that a hypothetical set of multiple universes comprises everything that can possibly exist simultaneously. Are you following? The entirety of space, time, matter and energy is all happening at once in different timelines: It’s the idea of parallel universes. Right? So okay, let’s presume the multiverse is real. Well then, maybe somewhere in those infinite universes is one, or several, where I deserve you. Maybe there’s a universe out there — happening now — where we end up together and when I close my eyes at night, I’m not dreaming the way a normal person would. Instead I’m seeing flashes of our lives in the multiverse. They’re not simple dreams because I miss you, right? They’re scientific, anachronistic visions. For instance: In this universe, I don’t want a family, but maybe in another, I’m more of the type to settle down. Maybe there’s a universe where you hold my hand while I give birth to our daughter in a white hospital room with pink flowers and fuzzy teddy bears on the window sill. Where we take family vacations and pose for dorky pictures in our neon bathing suits on the sands of a Florida beach. Where we curl up to watch a cheesy movie at the end of a long day in our big, green, suburban house once the kids have fallen......

Words: 773 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Where Is Tension Is Romeo and Juilet

...the epistemological tenets of philosophical naturalism, which are commonly referred to as "methodological naturalism"(4). If, however, the theoretical concept of "Multiverse"(7) is correct, then our particular "universe" is not "all there is." It is only one of possibly an infinite number of "universes" throughout eternity, as in a cyclic Universe (8), or in infinite space, as in multiple universes existing at the same time (9), or both (see Note 1). This implies that the fate of our particular "universe" isn't very important in the grand scheme of things. The "Multiverse" may well be unconcerned about the fate of our "universe". There are two very important points to be made here: Point 1) We are back to a very old position (10). Our "universe" because it has a linear history, must cycle into and out of different phases. It's cyclical (8). You see it is, after all, "turtles all the way down"(11) i.e. an infinite regression. But the Multiverse, itself, is infinite in time and space. It had no beginning and will have no end (see Notes 2 and 3). 52 Point 2) Copernicus strikes again (12)—it would be the greatest of hubris to think our "universe" with, and because of, its linear history, is all there is. Our Earth is not at the center of our "universe" and our "universe" probably isn't at the center of the Multiverse. After all, besides having infinite knowledge, what would it take to prove that our "universe" is all that there is? (see Note 4) And finally, because of......

Words: 8900 - Pages: 36

Free Essay

First Order and Second Order Cybernetic impossible. * Reality as multiverse: According to Becvar and Becvar (2013) we no longer talk about the universe, instead we concede that we live in a multiverse of many equally valid observer dependent realities. There is no single told truth or reality that is out there that were can point. We create our reality, our world by assimilation and accommodating inputs via our conceptual structures of personal world view. 3. How is reality seen by each specific approach In first order cybernetics reality is said to be subjective. The truth about the world is said to be out there external to the observer. Becvar and Becavar (2013) reiterated that in this approach reality is subjective rather than being objective, and how one create reality will be a function of the set of assumption and frame of reference one bring to bear on an event or experience. In second order cybernetic reality is described as either objective or subjective. However, reality is self-referential in that it does not refer to the outside environment as in this approach systems are closed, and multiverse. Maturana (1978) as cited in Becvar and Becvar (2013) noted that we literally create the world we live in by living in it. Each of us lives and creates reality in a slightly different manner based on our own unique combinatory of heredity, experience, presuppositions, and perception. It is again added by Becvar and Becvar (2013) that we live in a multiverse of many equally valid......

Words: 3307 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Assign Two Pyc4808

...therapist and client relate. This participation is of great importance in second order cybernetics. Reality in second order cybernetics is seen as a multiverse. (Becvar & Becvar, 2014) Question Three: How is reality seen by each specific approach? In first-order cybernetics, systems are viewed from the outside and the assessor does not see themselves as part of the system. 5 The system is assessed according what is viewed by the assessor and attempts to make changes in behavior in accordance to what is societally accepted in the system. Systems have different degrees of openness and closedness to external information from other systems. In second order cybernetics the assessor sees themselves as part of the system that is being observed. Reality is self-referential. The therapists own reality and belief system has an effect on the observation of the system and the problem being observed. Both the client and therapist have a shared reality. The client puts forward the content and the therapist puts forward the process. Also the therapist has greater information and understanding as they are part of the system. There is no external environment. Reality is a multiverse, and we all create our own reality according to our experiences and perceptions. To each person their own reality would be true, we all live in a multiverse of realities created by ourselves. (Becvar & Becvar, 2014) Question Four: How is health and pathology addressed by each approach? In......

Words: 2828 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

S, Kom

...menjalankan perintah rootfs kita masuk kedalam sistem sebagai super user. setelah itu kita dapat mengubah, mengganti, menghapus seperti yang diinginkan. Prompt ini berada di iso yang akan kira Remaster. Isikan aplikasi yang anda inginkan dan pastikan isi file sources.list benar cp /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list.original nano /etc/apt/sources.list setelah menjalankan perintah nano maka akan muncul Hapus semua dan ganti dengan server lokal dengan menggunakan Repository Lokal ITB deb trusty main restricted universe multiverse deb trusty-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb trusty-security main restricted universe multiverse deb trusty-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb trusty-proposed main restricted universe multiverse setelah diganti tekan Ctr+X -> Y -> Enter # apt-get update Tambahkan software yang anda suka misalnya dengan perintah # apt-get install gimp # apt-get install xfburn # apt-get install smplayer Setelah semua selesai lakukan cp /etc/apt/sources.list.original /etc/apt/sources.list rm /etc/apt/sources.list.original umount /proc umount /sys exit Pack untuk menjadi iso kembali akan butuh beberapa waktu terutama dibagian pack-rootfs sudo uck-remaster-pack-initrd sudo uck-remaster-pack-rootfs Tunggu hingga proses sampai 100%,......

Words: 343 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Epistemologies Governing the First- and Second-Order Cybernetic Approaches

...Epistemologies governing the first- and second-order cybernetic approaches: Ivan Bronkhorst Student number: 51863456 PYC4808 Assignment 2 Table of Contents 1. First Order Cybernetic (FOC) principles: 3 Recursion: 3 Feedback: 3 Morphostasis /Morphogenesis: 3 Rules and Boundaries: 3 Openness/Closedness: 4 Entropy/Negentropy: 4 Equifinality/Equipotentiality: 4 Communication and Information Processing 5 Relationship and Wholeness: 5 2. Second Order Cybernetic (FOC) principles: 6 Wholeness and Self-Reference: 6 Openness/Closedness: 7 Autopoiesis: 7 Structural Determinism: 7 Structural Coupling and Nonpurposeful Drift: 7 Epistemology of Participation: 8 Reality as a Multiverse: 8 1. First Order Cybernetic (FOC) principles: Recursion: Recursion is focused on the relationship between individuals and given elements in isolation. Recursion is, thus, focuses on how individuals and elements interact with, and influence one another respectively (Becvar & Becvar, 2014, pp. 69-70). In my opinion recursion in FOC refers to the circular causality or impact, if you will, that individuals and/or given elements have on one another. For instance, a child is extremely fearful of his father and, thus, doesn’t like talking to his father. His father, in turn, gets angry and strict when his son does not talk to him on a regular basis seeing as this makes him feel unwanted as a father. This behaviour from the father fuels the fear of the child creating a negative......

Words: 2814 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Ecosystemic Assignment2

...the observers perspective can we define the action of a as an error. Reality as a multiverse - each one create a reality according to their unique combination of heredity experience and perception. Epistemology of participation- this refers to how the participants in the system shift from viewing an absolute truth to a space where they form and create new different ways to coordinate their actions. Mutual reciprocity- arguments depend on the principle of mutual reciprocity which requires that when a quality is attributed to systems, there must be potential for the same quality to be attributed to the system it is distinguished from. Question 3 REALITY AS SEEN FROM BOTH FOC AND SOC PERSPECTIVE In first order cybernetics, reality is discovered through observation without the observer being influenced in the process. To ensure that the observer place themselves outside the system as observers of what is going on inside in-side the system (Becvar & Becvar, 2013) FOC defines reality in an objective manner which implies a single universe which is true to all people. In second order cybernetics, the observer is seen as part of the system. Reality is self- referential with no reference to an outside environment. The system is seen as closed with intact boundary where negative feedback may be defined. There is an emphasis on internal structure and structural determination. Reality is seen as a multiverse and there is a focus on mental health process (Becvar &Becvar, 2013). Both......

Words: 1592 - Pages: 7