Free Essay

Moral Reasoning

In: Business and Management

Submitted By jdavey29
Words 487
Pages 2
CRT/205
Influence of Moral Reasoning

The person, or people I should say, that I choose from the article is the Penn State Board of Trustees. When the information had come about of Jerry Sandusky they instantly fired Joe Paterno prior to having the information from the Freeh Report. The Freeh Report claims that Joe Paterno was in covering for Jerry Sandusky and was aware about the abuse. Joe Paterno at that point in time had worked for Penn State for quite some time and was fired without even a second thought of his innocence in the matter.
The impact of the actions that the Penn State Board of Trustee took was that Joe Paterno lost his job and livelihood. He lost his source of income and in a tough economy like the one we are in that is a rough blow to be dealt. I think what is so alarming is how quick the board of trustees were willing to write him off as if they knew he for sure was covering for Jerry Sandusky. They had no proof that he was involved in any way shape or form until after they had fired him. They in fact didn’t even receive the Freeh Report until after they had already let Paterno go.
If I had held the same position as the board of trustees then I would have had to have had the report in my hands to truly understand what the proper action to take would be. What is interesting here however is that even if I had been in that position and had waited to get the Freeh Report, I probably would had still made the decision to let Paterno go after reading the report. The reason that this is interesting is because as it turns out the report does not seem to be accurate enough to actually prove or disprove that Joe Paterno had any knowledge of the abuse. There turned up being many discrepancies in the report that leaves many to wonder the level of integrity in which the report was built on. I do know that morally is was wrong of them to act so quickly in firing Joe Paterno without sufficient proof that he in fact did cover up for Jerry Sandusky. Innocent until proven guilty is what I was always taught however this situation proves otherwise. I think my moral reasoning impacts my decision because I tend to see the good in people and know that there are times where innocent people have been accused of doing something that they in fact did not do. I cannot say if this is one of those situations but what I do know, is that if I was on the board I would have not acted so quick to fire someone without good reason with solid and proven evidence that he was aware of the abuse and was covering it up.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Morals

...person should have the right to be a self-appointed moral guardian. Everyone has different morals and different aspects on life, if this would happen it would be a dictatorship basically. Every person in the universe is entitled to their opinions and should not have to be judged based off of their opinions. For instance, in “The Possibility of Evil”, Helen Crane has a six month baby girl and spoilers her because that is way Mrs. Crane wants her child to feel, but Miss. Strangeworth (a very opinionated old lady) does not think that her baby should be treated as a princess. By taking someone’s moralities away that person’s one individualism. People who do this are bullies and tyrants. Stephen Vizinczey articulates, ““Dictatorship is a constant lecture instructing you that your feelings, your thoughts and desires are of no account, that you are a nobody and must live as you are told by other people who desire and think for you.” Dictators are a form of a self-appointed moral guardian. They believe that they should be able to have full power of what people do, think and believe in. Totalitarians force people into accepting their morals and what they think what is right and wrong. When Hitler was in charge of Germany in 1939 got people believe that polish people were scum of the earth and people followed him. All in all, no one should have the right to choose what people have to have faith in. If we judge people by their morals or their aspects on life we will never really......

Words: 301 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Moral

...Moral Education Assignment Topics 2012 1. Social service activity Organize a charity visit to an orphanage home, rehab center, old folks home, animal shelter or any welfare home. Write a full report on your visit. You must include charity itinerary and share your experience. You may include pictures, interview scripts with the Principal or any document which is relevant. 2. Bribery The problem of bribery exist and there has been attempt to curb it since the Melaka Sultanate period. Why is bribery an important issue? Write a report on the causes of this unethical conduct and how such problem can be resolved in our country, Malaysia. 3. HIV /AIDS As we are aware of, until now there is no cure for HIV infections and AIDS patients have to face death. Write a report on AIDS and explain the importance of protecting and not discriminating HIV/AIDS patients in our society. 4. Internet Internet misuse may cause harm and pollutes the mental growth of teenagers. Conduct a simple research on the disadvantages of internet for example addiction to social networking websites and the effect of this to users. 5. Bully issues Bullying has taken place for centuries where the stronger abuse the weaker. Write a report on the importance of overcoming bullying in schools. You may support your report with examples. (From newspaper cuttings, magazines, journals etc) 6. Family Institution In western countries, sending aged parents to retirement......

Words: 688 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

6 Stages of Moral Reasoning

...Excellent analysis and explanation of the 6 stages of moral reasoning. You demonstrate your understanding and application of the concepts/ Moral Reasoning By Christopher M Benco 02/18/2013 PHL/323 Kohlberg defines moral reasoning to be decisions based on right and wrong. Kohlberg’s studies were founded on moral dilemmas, or theoretical events in which one must make a tough choice. He describes one’s stage of moral thought from the perceptive used to defend one’s situation while confronted with a predicament. Kohlberg believed this to be of greater importance than the actual choice, subsequently the choices one makes in some predicaments are not always clear or undeniably right. Here is an Example of a Dilemma Kohlberg studied. “Heinz Steals the Drug” "In Europe, a woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to make. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about $ 1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: "No, I......

Words: 849 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Influence of Moral Reasoning

...Individual: Influence of Moral Reasoning Due: August 12, 2012 Individual: Influence of Moral Reasoning In the article by R.Scherer “Did Penn State Officials Ignore Sexual Abuse Allegations?” the actions of Gary Schultz. Gary Schultz was the Senior Vice President of Penn State University who had the responsibility of the campus police was informed by Tim Curley, the Penn State athletic director about allegations of sexual abuse against Penn State University football coach Jerry Sandusky by an eyewitness graduate student. The graduate student witnessed Jerry Sandusky sexually abusing a young boy (on Penn State facilities). Gary Schultz, the Vice President did not take action until two weeks after this report. It was not until two weeks later that Gary Schultz took initiative to speak to the graduate student who witnessed the abuse. After speaking to the graduate student, Gary Schultz then reported the claim as “horseplay” to the President of the University Mr. Graham Spanier. Gary Schultz downplayed the graduate student’s eye witness claim of sexual abuse to mere “horseplay”, which led the President of the University that the claim was not serious and no action needed to be taken. Gary Schultz, withholding the truth and seriousness of the claim resulted in chain of negative outcomes. Also, when he went to court, he lied on the stand and stated that he was not informed of the abuse by the graduate student...

Words: 528 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Actions Required When Applying Moral Reasoning

...Determine and assess the actions required when applying moral reasoning. Moral reasoning is a thinking process with the objective of determining whether a thought or action is right or wrong. It is significant to recognize the importance of moral factors in making decisions based on moral reasoning. There are two fundamental approaches of the moral assessment or appraisal of actions: The deontological approach and utilitarian approach. Basically, deontology refers to the study of the nature of duty and obligation. This principle depends on the action’s intrinsic nature, which defends that harming others is wrong regardless of its consequences. The utilitarian approach has a more practical approach in evaluating actions. The principle of utilitarianism, suggests that an action’s morality is determined by its consequences, for example harming others is acceptable if it increases the well-being of a greater number of people. According to utilitarianism, moral duty is instrumental, not intrinsic. Morality is a means to an end; not an end in itself. Some prefer one approach over the other when evaluating what actions are deemed right or wrong. There is no empirical evidence that one is better over the other. Though sometimes using both approaches simultaneously may be useful, depending on the particular context. Other times, it may be difficult to decide what approach to use, hence becoming a matter of judgment. Whatever approach we decide to use it is important to......

Words: 767 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Influence of Moral Reasoning

...Influence of Moral Reasoning Rohana Bjorkquist Crt/205 03/16/2014 The person I chose to write about and discuss moral reasoning is the assistant coach Mike McQuery. Some actions he decided to take was witness Sandusky having sex with the boys in the showers but not reporting it to the police or child protection agencies. The impact of the action that McQuery took is that he allowed Sandusky to continue sexually abusing these boys for years because he didn’t say anything to authorities. He allowed the abuse to continue for another 8 years before Sandusky finally had to face legal consequences for his actions. By not saying anything to authorities it is also giving Sandusky an okay to continue with his sexual acts since he does not have to face any consequences. The assistant coach may have feared that he would lose his job or that no one would believe him regarding the immoral actions that Sandusky committed. McQueary had a moral duty to those boys to stick up for them when he knew what was happening was morally wrong. Though in other countries or societies it may not be but in our culture and society, molesting children is morally and ethically wrong. McQueary ended up testifying to witnessing Sandusky’s acts but that did not happen until eight years later in 2010 when he witnessed the acts in 2002. Though he did come forward in the end, but his ethical and moral response should have been to alert the authorities when he first witnessed the act. If I would have......

Words: 387 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Influence of Moral Reasoning

...Influence of Moral Reasoning Mark R. Mitchell CRT/205 December 1, 2013 Rahana Schmalacker Influence of Moral Reasoning In accordance with this assignment to choose a person that is involved with the article chosen from the Opposing Viewpoint Resource Center, The article that I chose was “Superintendent, principal and two coaches charged in fallout from Steubenville student rape”, and the person that I chose was the Ohio State Attorney General. As to the actions taken by the attorney general was to charge four more adults with crimes that relate to the student rape case. This occurring after the Grand Jury spent eight months investigating the case. The four include two coaches, the principle, and the Steubenville School Superintendent, the charges range from tampering and obstruction to failing to reporting child abuse. Henceforth the impact of these actions is the four will be held over for trial and possibly result in serving time in prison or be acquitted of these crimes. Additionally if I were the attorney general I feel that I would also bring these charges and prosecute to the fullest extent that the law would allow. I would also use this to show that there should not be a place in any school system in the country that the lack of action to protect children entrusted to their care will not be tolerated, and the......

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Reasoning

...Quantitative Reasoning 1. Create two sets.  Set A will be the list of the five items you personally need to buy the most (essential items).  Set B will be the list of the five items that you want to buy the most (fun stuff).  ANSWER: A = {CAR, GAS, WATER, FOOD, HOUSE} B = {CAR, COMPUTER, IPOD, HOUSE, TV} 2. List the items in Set A and Set B, and also list or state the items in the union and in the intersection of Set A and Set B. ANSWER: UNION = {CAR, GAS, WATER, FOOD, HOUSE, COMPUTER, IPOD, TV} INTERSECTION = {CAR, HOUSE} 3. Now assume that the prices of the items in your set A are 20, 40, 60, 70 and 80. Assume that the prices of the items in your set B are 90, 120, 30, 60 and 40. Note: if you have one or two identical items in both sets, then assume that the prices of the identical items are the same as the prices that appear in set A (instead of having two different prices to the same item.) ANSWER: A = {(CAR, $20) (GAS, $40) (WATER, $60) (FOOD, $70) (HOUSE, $80)} B = {(CAR, $20) (COMPUTER, $90) (IPOD, $120) (HOUSE, $80) (TV, $30)} 4. What will the total cost of Set A be if it contains one unit of each item? ANSWER: $270 5. What will the total cost of the union set be if it contains one unit of each item? ANSWER: UNION SET = $20 + $40 + $60 + $70 + $120 + $80 +$30 = $420 6. What will be the total cost of the intersection? ANSWER: ...

Words: 390 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Morals

...Can one be moral and not believe in God? Student’s Name Title of Course Instructor’s Name Date Can one be moral and not believe in God? The question as to whether one can have moral values and still believe there is no God is seemingly a puzzling query. In essence, it is proficient to commence with defining what moral values are. Morals are simply defined as the principles of wrong and right behaviors. An individual with high moral values knows the right things, and literally does and says the right things at the right time, with the right person, and utilizing the right materials. Believing in God or spiritual being is when an individual devotes their commitment to God or supernatural being in faith, expressions, worship, and conscientiousness. When one believes in God or a spiritual being, such could potentially play a great role on their moral behaviors. On the other hand, many people suppose that if one does not believe in a spiritual being or God, it is very hard for them to have moral values. However, there are also other people that suppose that having moral values do not necessarily require one to believe in God or spiritual beings[1]. What’s more, there also other people that suppose that believing in God or spiritual beings is not necessarily required for one to have moral values, but all they require is to belief in oneself, practice good ethics, as well as the knowledge of knowing and distinguishing......

Words: 1389 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning

...Recognize principles that underlie legal reasoning and argument There are several principles that underlie legal reasoning and argument. The first two are probably the most common and easily digestible in supporting an argument. These two principles of moral reasoning are the consistent and inconsistencies of principle; principle consistency establishes framework for repetitive pattern. What is presented is identical in all instances and shows no differences in relevant way; therefore the outcome should always be the same (Cheesebro, 2010). Second principle occurs when it appears violations are occurring with the consistency principle, which then bears a burden of proof is the person claiming such act (Cheesebro, 2010). If at work all employees were afforded their birthday off with the exception of one, then this would be a violation of the consistency principle and the burden of proof is easily delivered. When it comes to arguments, jurist and attorneys uses deductive and inductive reasoning; if deductive, the reasoning can be sound, valid, or invalid; and if indicative, it can range from strong to weak (Cheesebro, 2010). Arguments in court are submitted with a precedent case as a foundation to present a winning argument; this is the appeal to precedent (Cheesebro, 2010). According to “Case Briefs” (2015) website sites the Rule of Law where as “Statutes that make criminal all abortions except when medically advised for the purpose of saving the life of the mother......

Words: 340 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Art of Reasoning

...errors in logic Over Generalisation Begging the Question Getting Personal Undefined Terms False Non-sequitur Appeal to Emotive Cause- Effect (It does not Follow) the Crowd Language False Reasoning False Dilemma Appeal to Composition/ Authority Division from Analogy Complex Questions Arguments from Ignorance Appeal to Sympathy Common Errors in Logic Over Generalisation False Cause- Effect False Reasoning from Analogy As a member of this masters program you must have a degree Over Generalisation False Cause- Effect Mary is an Engineer False Reasoning from Analogy She must be struggling financially Over Generalisation False Cause- Effect False Reasoning Recent research has Recent research has shown that many shown that many students who watch TV students who watch TV for more than 4 hours for more than 4 hours each day get low marks each day get low marks from Analogy Watch TV and Fail Over Generalisation . False Cause- Effect False Reasoning from Analogy Spiders hear with their legs Over Generalisation False Factories have piped music to reduce stress Cause- Effect False Reasoning from Analogy Student should be allowed to play ghetto blasters during lectures Begging the Question Non-sequitur (It does not Follow) False Dilemma Complex Questions Arguments from......

Words: 3026 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Ethical Reasoning

...Answer: If there isn’t a confidentiality breech, then yes Billy should call his friend. The suggested actions should be honesty and be upfront to both parties, such as Call Tick and Check and ask for an extension, and then call Foot and Balance and ask about the offer status. The reasons behind this is to maintain your honesty, reliability, and integrity. #2 Question: Is it ever right to back out of a promise? Answer: Yes it is okay to back out of a promise if the end result causes harm. Ethical reasoning being used is reliability, because there is a moral duty to keep promises, but one must avoid bad-faith excuses and unwise commitments. #3 Question: Identify stakeholders and their interests. Answer: Both companies would be a stakeholder because both companies have a business interest of obtaining an ethical employee. However, Billy in this case, would just have self-interest rather than being a stakeholder. #4 Question: What are the alternatives using ethical reasoning? Answer: Two alternatives would be conformity and self-interest. Conformity in this case would allow Billy to keep his promise to Tick and Check, and then explain the situation to Foot and Balance to keep good relations. Self- interest in this case would have Billy accept the Foot and Balance offer, and then hope that Tick and Check will find a better candidate for the job position quickly....

Words: 258 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How Effective Is Kohlberg’s Stage Theory of Moral Development in Explaining Moral Reasoning and Moral Behaviour?

...‘How effective is Kohlberg’s stage theory of moral development in explaining moral reasoning and moral behaviour?’ Morality refers to the ‘principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour’ (Oxford dictionary, 2013). Moral development focuses on the way morality changes from childhood to adulthood. It consists of two things; moral reasoning and moral behaviour. Moral reasoning is when an individual tried to work out the difference between right and wrong by using logic. This is a process that is undertaken by people daily in their lives when faced with dilemmas and they need to make a decision based on the morality of the action and what the consequences could be. Moral behaviour is the way people can behave depending on their moral reasoning. Moral behaviour consists of four components; moral sensitivity, moral judgement, moral motivation and moral character. Many theories have been developed on moral development. These theories are based on an individual’s level of cognitive maturity. This essay focuses on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development, and aims to discuss how effective Kohlberg’s stage theory of moral development is, in explaining moral reasoning and moral behaviour. Kohlberg Developed the moral development theory based on Piaget’s theory. Piaget believed that moral development was only a two-staged theory; the first stage of his theory was common in childhood and was called the ‘Heteronomous’ stage. The general idea......

Words: 1572 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Moral

...Moral and Ethical Dilemmas One of the most difficult trials I face in my life are ethical and moral dilemmas. They can be soul-wrenching and searching experiences that tax my character and cause me to really "put my money where my mouth is." Sometimes I'm quick to see ethical faults in others, but slow to see them in myself. Other times I see all to clearly my mistakes and wonder why I don't measure up. I believe one purpose for this life is to learn to act for ourselves. Learn to see a situation correctly and act righteously. In this paper I wish to discuss many of the thoughts I have had recently on setting a pattern for making ethical decisions throughout my life. I will present many of the traps I have fallen into or observed in others. Everyday I'm faced with decisions of right and wrong, most of which are easily and correctly dealt with. Sometimes however, decisions need to be made that are not easy or clear-cut. They require thought and often prayer. I like to draw on past experience to make comparisons that help give insight to new problems. Many times, however past experiences cannot be related to present problems and can confuse and obscure possibilities. Even the opinions or actions of friends faced with similar dilemmas may not be helpful. Often you feel pressured by piers that say, "it's no big deal", or "you'll understand later". It's important that I understand why a particular action or resolution is correct or incorrect. If I can't or don't it's difficult to......

Words: 1495 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Moral Reasoning

...what what we deliberately choose to believe. This can be an indespenable tool in our efforts to reduce our discrimination and bias’ towards people and issues. The second levelin which we process information is our uncsonscious; this is where our automatic and prior asscociations categorize information before we have had the time to consciously think about it. This presnts the theory that as we grow and develop, we may have a tendancy to automacically discriminate, yet it is our conscious efforts to recognize and overcome these associations which makes us more empathic and enables to form more liberal beliefs and attitudes towards society. The interesting thing about this disparagement between our unconscious and conscious level of reasoning, is that it may affect how we initially react to situations or people. For example one may become nervous or apprehensive walking by agroup of boisterous African American youths on a dark night. These people may or not be dangerous, however without having any contact with these particular individuals, thourgh prior associations, we tend to automatically categorize them as thugs or potentially dangerous delinquents This may have a profound effect on the group of individuals themselves. This incident alone may not have a significant effect, but compound the situation 10 or 100 fold and undoubtedly it could have a profound effect on how these youths perceive themselves. Psychologists and researchers alike have agreed that the way people......

Words: 1277 - Pages: 6