Premium Essay

Kentucky V. King Case

In: Historical Events

Submitted By mattieh66
Words 354
Pages 2
July, 13 2013

(Week 3 Assignment Introduction to Law)

MOD6_

1. What are the two basic functions of trial courts.

The trial court's basic function is to resolve disputes by determining the facts and applying legal principles to decide who is right. The appellate court's task is to determine whether the law was applied correctly in the trial court.

2. What is the difference between a dissenting and a concurring opinion?

So Majority opinion is called the "Opinion of the Court," this is the official verdict in the case that represents the vote of the majority of justices

Dissenting opinion is an opinion that is written by a justice who disagrees with the majority

Concurring opinion is an opinion that agrees with the decision but may disagree with the some of the reasoning behind the Court opinion, or may elaborate on a point made or introduce further relevant information

3. List the major differences between trial and appellate courts.

Trial courts are the courts where cases start. In the trial court, both sides present evidence to show their version of what happened but in the appellate courts, there are no witnesses, and no evidence is presented.

Also the second difference between the two courts is the judges. In trial courts, there is one judge in the courtroom. That judge decides what evidence can and cannot be used and often decides the outcome of the case. In Indiana, appeals are decided by more then one judge.

The last major difference between the trial courts and the appellate courts is the role of the jury. A jury is a group of citizens who listen to the facts and make decisions about the case.

4. On what basis (you can name more than one) can a Case go to Federal Court?

It has to do with something that involves a question of federal law or that the federal court has…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Case Brief Stanford V. Kentucky

...I. Style of the case: Stanford v. Kentucky 492 U.S. 361, 109 S. Ct. 2969, 106 L. Ed. 2d 306 (1989). II. Statement of Facts: Kevin Stanford committed the murder of Barbel Poore in Jefferson County, Kentucky on January 7, 1981, when he was approximately 17 years and 4 months of age. Stanford and his accomplice repeatedly raped and sodomized Poore during and after their commission of a robbery at a gas station, where Stanford shot her pointblank in the face and then the back of her head. A Kentucky juvenile court conducted hearings to determine whether he should be transferred for trial as an adult under Ky. Rev. Stat Ann. § 208.170. That statute provided that juvenile court jurisdiction could be waived and an offender tried as an adult if he was either charged with a Class A felony or capital crime, or was over 16 years of age and charged with a felony. The juvenile court found certification for trial as an adult to be in the best interest of petitioner and the community. Stanford was convicted of murder, first-degree sodomy, first-degree robbery and receiving stolen property, and was sentenced to death. III. Procedural History: This case was first tried in a Kentucky juvenile court and Stanford was convicted of murder, first-degree sodomy, first-degree robbery and receiving stolen property, and was sentenced to death. The Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed the death sentence. IV. Issues in the case: These two consolidated cases require us to decide whether the......

Words: 379 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Justin King Case

...IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN KING ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) CIVIL ACTIONS NO: ____________________ vs. ) ) ) JUDGE: _____________________________ ANHEUSER BUSCH and ) FRANK CUELLAR ) ) DEFENDANT ) COMPLAINT COMES NOW, plaintiff, Justin King and for his complaint, alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was a resident of the County of Paxton, State of Illinois. 2. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that defendant, Anheuser Busch, was and is a business primarily operating out of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri. 3. This is an action for damages in excess of $75,000.00, as required by 28 USC 1332. 4. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times and places herein mentioned defendant, Frank Cuellar, was operating a certain 1992, Nissan UD2000 B, 24ft straight truck, WHITE in color, PLATE NO. 07 MO 968-7RL., fully loaded with cases of Anheuser Busch product. 5. At all times herein mentioned plaintiff was and now is the owner of a certain 2006, Harley Davidson X-73, motorcycle, BLACK in color, PLATE NO. 07 MO 327-HP8 6. At all times herein mentioned Interstate 57 was and now is a public highway running in a general northerly and southerly direction. 7. On or about the 8th day of April, 2004 plaintiff was operating his automobile in a prudent and careful manner in a general...

Words: 1215 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Burger King Case Analysis

...Burger king is the second largest fast food hamburger chain in the world with more than 12,174 restaurants across 76 countries 60% of which are located in the US & 90% of its restaurants are franchised. By looking at the industry, we can see that Burger king is operating within the fast food hamburger (FFHR) category of the quick service restaurant in the restaurant industry. Sales for the FFHR has been growing rapidly (with a total of 30% over the last 10 yrs) (inspite the of the economy crisis of 2008) & anticipated to sustain this annual growth of 3% till 2015. Although being in a promising industry, it’s obvious that burger king is facing a problem as we take into consideration that it accounts for ONLY14% of total FFHR in the US. The most important issues facing Burger king are the following: 1. Failure to scan its external environment & subsequently lagging behind competition : Burger king`s 12,174 restaurants doesn`t seem to compare to the 32,466 Mcdonald`s restaurants worldwide both in number & sales volume (Mcd. Sells twice as Burger king in US & is twice as profitable. 2. Decline in value of the company share price by half, in addition to a decrease in net profit (although the total revenue only decreased slightly) 3. Failure to recognize its potential opportunities by targeting a limited segment in the market.: ( young adults who were the most affected by the 2008 economy crisis) while ignoring a broader segment like kids & families. 4.Failure in......

Words: 1493 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Unit V Case Study

...McDonald’s Case Study V McDonald’s perceived product positioning maps in comparison to their corporate strategy do line up to what is expected. There are areas for improvement in relation to their direct competition in every town. In reference to EPS/EBIT, it is relevant to their strategy implementation. McDonald’s product positioning maps do line up with their corporate strategy. Their strategy or motto is “Plan to Win”. When I think of a fast food restaurant winning, I think of winning over the masses of customer traffic. They certainly do this well. What makes up this strategy is; continued growth in the US and abroad, being a sustainable company, new items, new designs of business models, and remaining very competitive (NMINM's University, "n.d."). There is nothing about being the best quality, friendliest customer service, healthiest option, or most comfortable atmosphere. In these categories, I feel that they want to just do better than they have in the past with continued improvements. When you take a look at these product positioning maps, they tend to fall on the lower ends and very conservative in many fields such as atmosphere, quality, healthy choices, and limited choices (NMINM's University, "n.d."). Areas they tend to do better than some of their competition is speed of service, taste, and price (NMINM's University, "n.d."). This is in line with sales. These are the categories that the masses of customers tend to pay more attention to. There are over 32,000......

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Nadel V. Burger King

...1. What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points). Trial court made the decision 2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment? (3 points) a. In the case of Nadel et at v. Burger King Corp. & Emil Inc., “the trial court granted the motions of both defendants for summary judgment”. 3. Briefly state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points) b. The facts of this case are that Christopher Nadel suffered from second degree burns to his right foot after being burned by hot coffee ordered from a Burkger King drive-thru. Christopher was seated in middle front seat between his father, Paul and Grandmother, Evelyn. Evelyn received a burn to her right leg when tasting her coffee and it was too hot. Christopher’s second degree burns resulted when Evelyn was placing her coffee down and Paul pulled into the street. On behalf of Christopher, the Nadels sued the owner of Burger King for product liability and failure to display hot warning labels. The owner of Burger King and Burger King Corp. moved for summary judgment which the trial court granted. Burger King stated they were immune to product liability because they aren’t the manufacturer, seller, or supplier of the faulty cups. 4. According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress, and what tort did the court approve? (5 points) c. This is not a negligent......

Words: 332 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

King Henry V

...Kenneth Branaugh’s film version of William Shakespeare’s Henry V is based on the exploration of leadership. Although the film was difficult to follow at times, certain diction and actions of the characters made the film easier to follow. The diction and actions of King Henry V definitely showcased his abilities as a leader. Henry V focuses on leadership development by concentrating on succession, conflict and redemption. In the film, Henry V shows growth through stature and ability all while developing skills and credibility in the eyes of his followers. Because of this growth, Henry V comes to epitomize transformational leadership through his use of key qualities like vision and values, energy and a teachable point of view. It is through his use of vision and values, energy and a teachable point of view that his followers witness not only his growth as a leader, but also his attention to England’s well-being, unifying his realm and achieving organizational goals. When young King Henry V assumed the throne of his father, Henry IV, he was adamant on gaining the respect of the English people and the court. In order to gain this respect, Henry V had to live down his wild adolescent past in which he befriended drunkards and thieves and showed disrespect to the throne. As shown in the film, Henry V was willing to do whatever was necessary to disassociate himself with his adolescent past. If this meant rejecting his former drunkard and thieve friends, then Henry would......

Words: 1435 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Nadel Et Al V Burger King Corp

...Carmelita Cain MGMT 520 Week 3 Assignment Nadel et al. v. Burger King Corp. & Emil, Inc. case 1. What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points) COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, HAMILTON COUNTY 2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment? (3 points) Emil moved for summary judgment, claiming that no genuine issue of material fact existed. BK also moved for summary judgment and pointed to evidence in the depositions that appellants knew the coffee was hot and that coffee was purchased and served as a hot beverage. It also contended under the circumstances that Evelyn's and Paul's actions were intervening, superseding causes precluding any actionable negligence on its part. 3. Briefly state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points) Christopher Nadel received second degree burns from coffee spilling on his right foot purchased at Burger King by his grandmother Evelyn Nadel. The Nadel’s brought suit against Burger King and franchise owner Emil, Inc, for product liability for a defectively designed product and for failure to warn of the dangers of handling a liquid served as hot as their coffee. The court granted both the Burger King owner and Burger King Corporation request for motion of summary of judgments. The Nadel’s appealed. The court affirmed in part and reversed in part. The summary judgment was wrongly granted on...

Words: 1465 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Burger King Case Study

...Burger King: Promoting a Food Fight What are Burger King’s communication objectives for its target audience? Burger King’s CEO Brad Blum said that he wanted to develop “ground-breaking, next level, results-oriented, and innovative advertising that strongly connects without our core customers.” In response to declining market share to McDonalds and Wendy’s, BK needed a different direction in how it communicates with their customers. They chose an ad agency that can help them to generate buzz via unorthodox methods that their main target audience of younger males can connect with. They were able to reach their objectives. With its focus on the “super fan,” does BK risk alienating other customers? What are the implications of this? There is always risk of alienating customers when you do not focus your communications methods to specifically target them. However, in 2003 BK found itself in a situation where they were alienating their main customers by not focusing on them, the “super fan.” Since the “super fan” accounts for more than fifty percent of total sales, it made a lot of sense for BK to attempt to get back into good standing with this segment of the population. People tend to visit restaurants in groups and BK knows this. Therefore, by attracting their biggest fans back to the stores they are in turn also attracting their family and friends whom they share a meal with. By focusing on a more targeted audience to......

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Nadel V. Burger King

...1. What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points). Trial court made the decision 2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment? (3 points) a. In the case of Nadel et at v. Burger King Corp. & Emil Inc., “the trial court granted the motions of both defendants for summary judgment”. 3. Briefly state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points) b. The facts of this case are that Christopher Nadel suffered from second degree burns to his right foot after being burned by hot coffee ordered from a Burkger King drive-thru. Christopher was seated in middle front seat between his father, Paul and Grandmother, Evelyn. Evelyn received a burn to her right leg when tasting her coffee and it was too hot. Christopher’s second degree burns resulted when Evelyn was placing her coffee down and Paul pulled into the street. On behalf of Christopher, the Nadels sued the owner of Burger King for product liability and failure to display hot warning labels. The owner of Burger King and Burger King Corp. moved for summary judgment which the trial court granted. Burger King stated they were immune to product liability because they aren’t the manufacturer, seller, or supplier of the faulty cups. 4. According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress, and what tort did the court approve? (5 points) c. This is not a negligent......

Words: 332 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

King Company Case

...THE KING COMPANY BACKGROUND The King Company experiences many of the difficulties common in today’s business climate. In response to declining sales, the company must transform itself from a strategy of expansion and high profit to one of cost containment and staff reductions. The case discusses the organization and provides details of the human resource department. Also presented are e-mails from various staff members. The e-mails identify specific problems that need to be addressed by the HR department and provides a look at King’s overall culture. You may find the tone of some e-mails to be unprofessional. This is a good lesson for us all--As much as we enjoy informality in the workplace, all documents and correspondence— including e-mails—can be retained and are discoverable in litigation. Managers must be cautious in their writing because inappropriate language may be impossible to defend in court. Employees In the Case: Amera, Argonta---Accounting employee Andreas, Gary---employee on workers’ comp Call, Jake---Compensation & Benefits Manager Dean, Don---C.E.O. Dugas, Karla---Benefits Coordinator Folkner, Meg---Supervisor, CAD Design Grant, Alan---Current HR Director Honduras, Margo---Previous HR Director Jones, Lyle---Production Employee Madison, Charles---Senior V.P. Petersen, Matt---Production Supervisor, Team 3 Planky, Burt---fishing buddy Putt, Tonia---CAD Designer Rey, Dave---Production Foreman Sanders, Tomas---Design......

Words: 4525 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

Audi V D'Amato Case

...Audi AG and Volkswagen of America Inc. v. D’Amato Case Yamileth Hoffman Palm Beach State College Abstract Business owner Bob D’Amato, who was unaffiliated with Audi, the automobile maker, in any official manner, used the domain name www.audiosport.com to sell Audi items such as t-shirts, hats, and other accessories. The site was linked to a dealership in Florida; an establishment whom D’Amato said gave him permission to use the Audi trademarks (Roger E. Meiners, 2012 p. 243-244). . Audi Ag and Volkswagen of America Inc. v. D’Amato D’Amato stated that he did not have any affiliation with Audi. This statement did not protect him for engaging in infringement, dilution, and cybersquatting since he deliberately designed his website by displaying the Audi Trademarks and affirmatively misrepresented its affiliation with Audi, to lead consumers to believe that his website was affiliated with Audi "Who are we? We are a cooperative with Audi of America, and will be providing the latest products for your Audi's and information on Audi sport North America"(Plaintiffs' Motion, Exhs. 17-21). D’Amato has testified that he never received written permission from anyone to display the Audi Trademarks (D'Amato Dep. at 56-57, 85, 91-93). Defendant also implemented an email subscription service offering "audisport.com" email addresses ( Id. at 114-118). Defendant also offered to sell advertising space on the website. This could harm Audi because the company could be suit for......

Words: 553 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Tate V. Florida and King V. Florida

...I will briefly discuss the two cases; punishments received and speak on if the charges fit the crimes committed. I will discuss if any other charges may have been applicable to each of the defendants. Finally, I will determine if the punishment imposed violated the prohibition of “cruel and unusual” punishment in the constitution. These two cases have caught the attention of the public due to the nature of the crime and also the outcome of the court’s decisions. In 2001, Lionel Tate, 12-years-old, is convicted of a first degree murder for killing six-year-old playmate Tiffany Eunick. According to Tate’s defense attorney, the defendant was imitating wrestling stars when he claimed that he unintentionally killed the victim. Tate was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. Tate could have been charged with manslaughter as the rules for manslaughter are geared towards charging a person for negligence versus intent to kill. However, the judge felt the slaying was “cold, callous and indescribably cruel.” In the case, King v. Florida, Alex King, 13, and Derek King, 14, were charged with first degree murder, arson and were given under 10 years in prison without parole. The King siblings killed their sleeping father and then set their house on fire to cover up their crime. The defense attorney said the brothers wanted to escape from their father and be with their neighbor, Ricky Chavis. It was said that Alex was in love with Chavis and that the old neighbor is...

Words: 506 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

King Case Study Individual Paper

... U.S. v. King Case Study Elise Flanagan BCC 402 Bobby Kemp 14 March 2016 Introduction The purpose of this work is to discuss the relevancy of the court case the United States of America v. Richard D. King, Jr. and the influence it had on future cybercrime cases. A description will be given as to how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments are applied to cybercrimes, as well as an explanation how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments were addressed in this case. Further explanation on how the King ruling may apply to other cases involving computers or other devices that contain electronic evidence is provided. The 4th and 5th Amendments Applied To Cybercrimes The 4th Amendment can be applied to cybercrimes, but not the 5th Amendment. However, the 4th Amendment’s protection in regards to computers, the Internet and cybercrimes can only be applied to data content, not all content. An example of data content is found within remote storage files on computers and private email interactions. When the data is non-content data, i.e. email addresses, there is no assumption of guaranteed coverage and protection ruled under the 4th Amendment. Unlike the 4th Amendment, the 5th Amendment cannot always provide legal protection to an individual. The federal court made such a ruling in 2012, asserting that personal computers lacked the coverage many assumed was in place after the 4th was seen as a viable use for protection of individual rights. Application to This Case The 4th and 5th Amendments......

Words: 973 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Unit V Case Study

...Unit V Case Study BCJ-2001 March 29, 2016 Introduction The exclusionary rule applies to evidence which has been confiscated in infringement of the U.S. Constitution. There have been many alterations to the exclusionary rule and its applications throughout the years. The exclusionary rule, in addition to three court cases, which have had a direct impact on the rule, will be examined in this case study. The court cases are Weeks v. United States (1914), Rochin v. California (1952), and Mapp. Ohio (1961). The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and how it operates is accordance to the exclusionary rule, will also be studied. Additionally, this case study will examine logical searches and how they may have pertained to the three court cases. Exclusionary Rule The exclusionary rule is an interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment by the Supreme Court, it is not part of the U.S. Constitution (Dempsey, 2013). When written, the Bill of Rights only applied to “agents of the federal government—not to those of local governments—the Court first applied the exclusionary rule only to federal courts and federal law enforcement officers.” (Dempsey, 2013, p.179) In court cases, the rule has progressed as an interpretation of the Fourth Amendment by the Supreme Court, which forbids any irrational search and seizure of a citizen. Illegally confiscated evidence cannot be utilized against a defendant in a court, as it violates the Fourth Amendment, thus, the evidence...

Words: 1934 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Justin King Case

...Answer To Complaint Justin King Case Civil Litigation Unit 5 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI Justin King - Plaintiff v Anheuser Busch - Defendant * * * * * CASE NO. Answer to Complaint COMES NOW, Anheuser Busch, the Defendant, and hereby answers the Plaintiff’s Complaint as follows: PARTIES 1. As to paragraph 1, it is hereby admitted in part. Defendant resides in said county. As for the other allegations, Defendant does not have sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations, and on that basis, denies the allegations. 2. As to paragraph 2 and 3, it is hereby admitted in part. One of Anheuser Busch’s trucks was driven in Ford County, Paxton, Illinois, which passed a motorcycle driven by the Plaintiff. 3. As to paragraph 4, it is hereby admitted in part. The Defendant passed the motorcycle in Paxton, Illinois as follows: a. Defendant must flash lights to indicate he wishes to pass. b. The Plaintiff is required to move over if conditions allow. c. Part of Defendant’s shipment did fall off truck, however, Plaintiff, could have slowed down, or swerved a different direction. d. Had the Plaintiff worn protective headgear as required by the State of Missouri, this accident may not have been as sever. Affirmative Defenses 4. The Plaintiff ......

Words: 298 - Pages: 2