Free Essay

Jbh Analyst Report 2011

In: Business and Management

Submitted By bri123
Words 6977
Pages 28
JB Hi Fi Limited(JBH) | April 17
2011
| The following document is a complete valuation JBH based on DCF and Relative Valuation. All input justifications are provided and a final recommendation is presented. | |

Business Summary
JB Hi Fi (JBH) has experience unprecedented growth in the past few years in excess of 10% despite the Global Financial Crisis and weak consumer spending environments. JBH is likely to continue its strong growth (although below expectations) through a combination of recovering market conditions, a new era of smart products and with official interest rates likely to be placed on hold by the RBA until the end of 2011.
(A) CHOICE OF MODELS
-------------------------------------------------
1. Discount Models
Why FCFF Discount Model?
DDM would not be a suitable model because JBH paid dividends which are significantly greater than or lower than FCFE to the firm between 2006 and 2010 thereby underestimating or overestimating the value of JBH (dividends less than 80% of FCFE or greater than 110% FCFE) .
The debt to equity ratio has been volatile declining from 82.90% in 2003 to 23.73% in 2010 with a spike of 120.96% in 2006. Estimating future debt issues and repayments will prove to be difficult given that changes are expected because JBH has raised their senior debt facility by $105 million expiring by 2014 possibly to finance the roll out of up to 193 new stores by 2014 as well. The recent stock repurchases of $173 million and possible future repurchases if JBH continues to accumulate cash, will also have significant impacts on leverage.
FCFF will certainly be the most appropriate model to apply since debt is not directly considered in determining the cash flow whereas in the FCFE model, the value of net debt issued must be backed out.
Furthermore, FCFF refers to cash flows available to investors so recent stock repurchase of $173 million can be ignored since stock repurchases refer to uses of those cash flows. However, if we ignore the effect of repurchase (common approach by analysts) in DDM, we may well under-estimate the value of equity.
DDM or FCFE Discount Model?
Must we choose one of the two, DDM is preferred. As mentioned earlier, FCFF is inappropriate due to a fluctuating leverage making it difficult to forecast future net debt issues. Despite the weakness in using DDM leading to over/under valuation, its simplicity will render it more useful than FCFE.
-------------------------------------------------
2. Number of Growth Stages
Three-Stage Growth
Some indicators suggest JBH has not reached stable growth. * There is potential for JBH to exploit an online market and larger market share since JBH’s market capitalisation is well less than $10 million, sitting at $1.714 billion.

* Moderately high equity reinvestment rate of 39.86%.
We assume the high growth period to extend for another 2 years because of: * Their focus on a Cost of Doing Business (CODB) Model to reduce business cost and increasing labour productivity. The cost of doing business has declined from 15% in 2007 to 13.2% in 2010 with further drops expected. JBH’s unique management has allowed them promise the “cheapest price” thus differentiating them from competitors.

* Increase in sales from release in popular electronics including the Nintendo 3DS and Ipad2 in early 2011 as well as the expected release of Iphone5 in the latter half of 2011.

* Initiatives to develop an online presence with online sales grown over 35% in the first half of 2011.

* Rollout of new stores from 130 stores in 2010 to 193 in 2014. This has been the driving factor for solid growth in comparison to its competitors such as Myers and Harvey Norman.
With a growing market share and firm size, JBH’s high growth will eventually become unsustainable because the retail sectors has few barriers to entry (international firms such as Costco have entered the Australian market) with other firms increasingly wanting to have “a bite of the cherry” . The stronger AUD will also direct buyers towards imports rather than local purchases. Eventually growth will enter a transitional period towards a stable growth that we assume to be the industry level of 3.01% for EBIT and 5.49% for NI.
Some analysts consider JBH to possess mature firm characteristics but we believe there is still much room for growth in light of current double figure growth rates – a view shared by Patrick Elliot, Chairman of JBH. We assume JBH to be able to sustain a transitional growth period of 6 years.
For the 2 models that are discussed we apply the three stage growth.

-------------------------------------------------
(B) FREE CASH FLOW TO FIRM (FCFF)
-------------------------------------------------
1. Estimating Discount Rate
Cost of Equity (ke) 1. Risk Free Rate, rf
The risk free rate is one that has no default risk and no reinvestment risk. We will use the 10-Year Australian Government Treasury bond of 5.51% as a proxy because we are valuing a firm in Australian dollars and since firms are valued as a going concern we use the bond with the longer time to maturity. This will be kept constant for the entire valuation period.

2. Equity Risk Premium
To compute the required risk premium we first use US historical equity risk premium of 5.01% by: * Choosing T-Bond since valuation is longer term. * Choose the longest study period to reduce the standard error. * Use geometric averaging because of the compounding effect expressing returns over multiple periods.

We will then adjust it for the country risk of Australia to proxy the required equity risk premium. For simplicity we assume country risk equals to a country’s default spread. Since Australia has a rating of Aaa the default spread is 0% and so the equity risk premium remains at 5.01% which will be kept constant for the entire analysis.

ERPTotal=ERPUS+Counry Risk Prem
5.01%=5.01%+0%
3. Beta, β
We will use current levered beta of 1.26 from Finanalysis because other financial services such as NineMSN Finance are also in consensus. Other analyst may prefer a Bottom-ups-Approach which considers the fundamentals but that would require estimation of certain inputs - financial services firms such as I/B/E/S and Finanalysis are better equipped in doing so.
The assumption that current beta will decline to the industry level of 1.19 at stability is applied. 4. Cost Of Equity
Cost of equity is calculated by using:

ke=rf+βl(equity risk premium)

which will yield a current figure of 11.82% and 11.47% at stability.
After Tax Cost of Debt (kd)
After tax cost of debt will be computed using:

rf+default spread(1-tax rate)

which yields 4.21% given the inputs below and risk free rate from above for the entire valuation time line. 1. Default spread
Since JBH does not have widely traded bonds, default spread is ascertained by using a synthetic rating. JBH has an interest coverage ratio of 31.8 in 2010 thus a synthetic rating of AAA. This translates to a default spread of 0.50%

2. Tax Rate, t
The marginal tax rate of 30% is applied for the period of analysis rather than an effective tax rate because it does not just reflect the difference between accounting and tax books but the tax paid on the additional dollar earned. Although the marginal tax rate may understate the EBIT(t-t) in earlier years but more accurate in later years.
WACC
1. Market Value of Debt to Market Value Equity
Rather than systematically calculating the respective market values (MV) we obtained the following values for 2010 from Damodoran’s website: * MV Debt / MV Capital = 2.89% * MV Equity / MV Capital = 97.11%
The reason being that market value of debt includes book value of debt and the present value of tradable bonds but this is difficult to ascertain.
The proportions are assumed to increase linearly towards industry level of the following at stability: * MV Debt / MV Capital = 20.14 * MV Equity / MV Capital = 79.86%
This is acceptable since stable firms are expected to take up higher levels of debt. 2. WACC
WACC is calculated using the formula: keMV EquityMV Capital+kdMV DebtMV Capital

Given the inputs earlier we will yield a current WACC of 11.60% and 10.01% at stability.
-------------------------------------------------
2. Estimating Growth, g
We have three ways to estimate growth either: a) Historical data, b) Analyst Forecast or c) Fundamentals
For our valuation we have decided to estimate growth based on fundamentals because it allows us to relate a firm’s reinvestments and the quality of those reinvestments to future growth. This is the most appropriate method out of the selection range because reliance on historical data via arithmetic/geometric mean or linear/log regression is not a good indicator of future growth. Although analyst forecasts are better than historical data as they factor in firm specific data, they my may often fail to recognise changes in a firm’s fundamentals.
Essentially fundamental growth in EBIT is given by: g=ROC×reinvestment rate (b)
We will forecast operating income after tax by assuming 2 year high growth followed by a 6 year transition period to stable growth. * High Growth Stage – We assume JBH to sustain their current ROC of 49.37% and reinvestment rate of 27.26% for a further 2 years which will translate to a high growth of 13.45%.

* Transitional Growth Stage – We assume ROC and reinvestment rate to decline linearly to industry levels of 15.82% and 19.03% respectively. Consequently there will be gradual decline in growth rate to 3.01% at stability.

* Stable Growth Stage - Using a combination of industry ROC and reinvestment rate we obtain a stable growth of 3.01%. The use of this value in stable growth is justified by it being essentially the long term growth rate of the economy at 3%

-------------------------------------------------
3. Adjusting Earnings
Financing expenses are treated as operating expenses by accountants. Therefore, we have adjusted 2010 accounting EBIT by operating leases based on:
Adj EBIT=EBIT+Operating Lease Expenses-Depreciation on lease asset

Therefore 2010 Adj.EBIT(1-t) is:
Adj.EBIT2010 =$175.10+$53.38-$8.73=$224.75
Adj.EBIT20101-t=$224.751-0.3=$157.33
Future earnings are forecasted by the growth rates calculated earlier.
-------------------------------------------------
4. Calculating FCFF
FCFF can be computed by using either: adj.EBIT1-t-Net Capex- ∆NCWC
OR
adj.EBIT1-t×reinvestment rate (b)
As previously mentioned the reinvestment rate is assumed to be constant for the 2 years of high growth at 27.26% and then declined linearly to 19.03% at stable growth.
Therefore,
FCFF2010=$157.33×27.26%=$114.45
Future FCFF are calculated in the same manner with their respective EBIT(1-t), growth rate and retention rate.
-------------------------------------------------
5. Terminal Value
Terminal value was calculated using the formula:
Adj.EBIT2018(1-t)(1+gstable)WACC-gstable
Therefore we arrive at the terminal value of $3240.78 million.
-------------------------------------------------
6. Valuation
Based on a three-stage FCFF discount model we: 1. Discounted the individual cash flows at their respective WACC to obtain a present value (PV). PV of: * High Growth FCFF = $218.35 million * Transitional FCFF = $633.05 million * Terminal Value = $1486.90 million
Total Value of operating asset today is equal to $2338.67 million. 2. Add cash & marketable securities and subtract debt. * Cash =$51.74 million * Debt = $366.33 million
Total Value of Equity is $2023.71 million. 3. Divide by 109.36 million shares outstanding
Value of Equity per share = $18.50
-------------------------------------------------
7. Sensitivity Analysis

The sensitivity of the value estimates equity value per share to changes in: 1. Periods of High Growth, 2. Stable EBIT growth and 3. Stable WACC are summarized in the tables below.

| Stable Cost of WACC (%) | stable ebit growth (%) | | 9.01 | 10.01 | 11.01 | | 1.01 | 16.60 | 15.30 | 14.26 | | 2.01 | 18.38 | 16.70 | 15.39 | | 3.01 | 20.77 | 18.50 | 16.81 | | 4.01 | 24.11 | 20.91 | 18.62 | | 5.01 | 29.12 | 24.28 | 21.05 |

stable ebit growth (%) | | Years in High Growth | | | | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | | 1.01 | 14.10 | 15.30 | 16.52 | | 2.01 | 15.48 | 16.70 | 17.95 | | 3.01 | 17.25 | 18.50 | 19.78 | | 4.01 | 19.61 | 20.91 | 22.23 | | 5.01 | 22.92 | 24.28 | 25.66 |

By examining the table it is clear that changes in stable growth rates have the greatest impact on the valuation followed by change in stable WACC and then the number of years in high growth.
Despite the stable growth being the key driver of the value of JBH, in reality we cannot obtain a stable growth of much higher than 3.01% because we cannot exceed the long term growth rate of the Australian economy.

(C) DIVIDEND DISCOUNT MODEL
-------------------------------------------------
1. Common Inputs to FCFF
The ROC and and cost of equity will be obtained in the same was discussed earlier as those in the FCFF model for the entire period of valuation.
-------------------------------------------------
2. Estimating Growth

1. Return on Equity
The 2010 ROE was calculated to be 51.74% and we assume this to be constant for the 2 years of high growth. From the end of high growth to stable growth we calculated the ROE using:

ROE=ROC+DEROC-i1-t
This method ensures consistency rather than making a new assumption that ROE decline linearly to industry levels. Consequently, at stable growth the ROE is at 18.71%. 2. Payout Ratio
The payout ratio was calculated via:

payout ratio=DPS/EPS

The 2010 payout ratio was computed to be 60.14% which reflects JBH’s currently policy to maintain a 60% payout. We make the assumption that the payout ratio declines linearly to 70% at stability. This is higher than then industry levels quoted by Damodoran because we prefer a value that better reflects characteristics of a stable firm.

3. Retention Rate
The retention rate is calculated by:
1-payout ratio
Subsequently, retention rate falls from 39.86% to 30% at stable growth. 4. Growth
The growth in NI was forecasted by applying:

g=ROE×equity retention rate(b)

* High Growth Stage – Since we made the assumption 2010 ROE is constant for the 2 years of high growth, it means that growth will be also constant at 20.62% during this period.

* Transitional to Stable Growth – Growth will decline linearly 6.08% at stability.

-------------------------------------------------
3. Calculating Dividends

We first calculated the future EPS by multiplying the base EPS of $1.10 by their respective growth rates.
The DPS is then determined by multiplying the EPS by its respective payout ratio.
-------------------------------------------------
4. Terminal Value
Terminal value was calculated using
DPS2018(1+gstable)ke-gstable
Note that the growth rate computation earlier, refers to growth in NI but the formula applies growth in dividends. However we can use the stable growth in NI of 5.51% also as the growth in dividend because at stability payout ratio is also constant.
Therefore terminal value is $44.11
-------------------------------------------------
5. Valuation

Based on the three-stage DDM model we discount all the dividends at their respect cost of equity.

Therefore we obtain a present value (PV) of: * High Growth dividends = $1.48 * Transitional dividends = $5.76 * Terminal Dividends = $18.43
Value of Equity Per Share $25.67

-------------------------------------------------
VI) Sensitivity Analysis
Akin to the FCFF model, the DDM is also highly sensitive to the changes in input values as can be seen below which can significantly under/overvalue JBH. | Stable Cost of Equity (%) | Stable Growth in NI (%) | | 10.47 | 11.47 | 12.47 | | 3.61 | $22.68 | $20.71 | $19.20 | | 4.61 | $25.49 | $22.83 | $20.85 | | 5.61 | $29.46 | $25.67 | $22.98 | | 6.61 | $35.48 | $29.66 | $25.84 | | 7.61 | $45.72 | $35.73 | $29.88 |

| Number of Years in High Growth | Stable Growth in NI (%) | | 1 | 2 | 3 | | 3.61 | $15.01 | $20.71 | 22.28 | | 4.61 | $16.58 | $22.83 | $24.56 | | 5.61 | $18.68 | $25.67 | $27.00 | | 6.61 | $21.66 | $29.66 | $31.95 | | 7.61 | $26.17 | $35.73 | $38.52 |

A 1% change in stable growth in NI leads to a greater change in equity value per share than a 1% change in stable cost of equity. Both a 1% change in stable growth or cost of equity has a greater impact than changing high growth period by one year.
We can conclude that the stable growth rate in NI is certainly the key driver in our valuation.

(D) RELATIVE VALUATION
Given the “rule of thumb”, for the retailing sector, the multiple used generally would either be PS or VS depending on whether the leverage across firms are similar or different, respectively. Firms | Financial Leverage2 | JBH | 246.55% | DJS | 160.56% | HVN | 171.73% | MYR | 227.88% | SRA | 252.36% | WTF | 267.14% | WHS | 222.60% | BRG | 158.97% | FAN | 185.86% | TRS | 259.83% |

Hence the multiple VS is chosen, as given the financial leverage across firms, they appear to be different. 1. -------------------------------------------------
Definition
Value-to-sales multiple * The numerator becomes the enterprise value, that is the market value of the operating assets (debt and equity) of the firm, net of cash. * The denominator is the total revenue of the firm.

This ratio is consistent as both numerator and denominator represent values of the firm. The ratio is also uniformly measured, as data used are retrieved from the current (i.e. most recent) financial year, yielding the current enterprise value and total revenue of the firm.
VS gives investors an idea of how much it costs to buy the company's sales. It is seen as more accurate measure than PS because PS uses market capitalization, equity portion of the firm, which does not take into account the amount of debt of a firm as well as enterprise value, the total capital structure of the firm.
The average VS multiple for the retailing sector is 0.59 with an average after-tax operating margin of 4.41% and average expected growth of 13.74%. 2. -------------------------------------------------
Fundamentals
To analyse the relationship between value and sales,we could consider the 2-stage high growth firm valuation model: where After-tax operating margin = EBIT(1-t)/Sales
From the equation, the underlying fundamental factors observed for high growth firms that determine the standardised enterprise value to sale multiple, include its growth, cost of capital, reinvestment rate and after-tax operating margin. 3. -------------------------------------------------
Relationship
Firms with increasing growth, decreasing cost of capital with increasing after-tax operating margin and better ability to sustain lower reinvestment needs are expected to have the larger enterprise value to sales multiples.
Each multiple has one variable that it is most closely linked to, with the VS multiple, it is the after-tax operating margin. An increase in after-tax operating margin directly supports a larger VS multiple.
The after-tax operating margin has a two-fold effect on the sales multiple.
An increase in after-tax operating margin will have a direct effect supporting a larger value to sales ratio.
An indirect effect also occurs, whereby an increase in after-tax operating margin causes an increase in expected growth in operating income. A higher expected growth in operating income increases the ROC, which in turn induces higher growth in after-tax operating income leading to a higher value to sales multiple or vice versa.

4. -------------------------------------------------
Application
For selected comparable firms:

Firms | Enterprise Value ($m) | Total revenue ($m) | EV/S ($m) | JBH | 2,084.03 | 2,731.60 | 0.7629 | DJS | 2,538.89 | 2,104.00 | 1.2067 | HVN | 3,858.19 | 2,397.60 | 1.6092 | MYR | 2,318.47 | 2,990.00 | 0.7754 | SRA | 47.01 | 58.40 | 0.8050 | WTF | 1,028.57 | 133.20 | 7.7220 | WHS | 920.16 | 1,348.60 | 0.6823 | BRG | 267.99 | 422.80 | 0.6338 | FAN | 226.86 | 423.50 | 0.5357 | TRS | 434.77 | 470.90 | 0.9233 |

Descriptive Characteristics | Average | 1.5656 | Standard deviation | 2.185837 | Median | 0.7902 | Minimum | .5357 | Maximum | 7.722 |

JBH’s VS in comparison to the other comparable firms, are quite similar whereby the multiple is around the same range below one, other than DJS, HVN and WTF. This may be attributed to the fact that DJS and HVN has lower reinvestment rates and a higher after-tax operating margin, resulting in a higher VS multiple. FAN’s VS, the smallest of our sample, is the opposite, where it has an extremely high reinvestment rate and a lower after-tax operating margin.
Implied Firm ValueJBH
= Average VS × Total revenue
= 1.5656 × 2731.60
= $4276.67 million
This value would be much larger than the actual firm value in the current period, which may be due to an outlier, an excessively large multiple, that is the WTF’s VS multiple. JBH’s VS and other comparable firm’s VS is much smaller compared to WTF, as for an internet firm, it has a much higher expected growth rate and higher after-tax operating margin, possibly due to the increasing market and usage of the world wide web. Due to the presence of an outlier, it causes the mean to exceed the median.
Since an outlier exists in our sample, we may use the median VS value can be used to determine the firm value.
Firm ValueJBH
= Median VS × Total revenue
= 0.7902 × 2731.60
= $2158.47 million
However, this value may not be very reliable, as it does not take into account the fundamental factors that influence the value to sales multiple.
-------------------------------------------------
4.1 Modified Multiple
Since after-tax operating margin plays such an important role in determining the VS, we may regress the VS on the after-tax operating margin.
Estimated VS modified multiple regression model:
VS = -.3873749 (.1996171)
+ .2101291(After-tax operating margin) (.0148779)
VSJBH = -.3873749 + .2101291(4.49) = 0.5555
Implied JBH firm value
= VSJBH × Total revenue
= 0.5555× 2731.60
= $1517.40 million
The actual VS ratio is 0.7629. This would suggest that the market has undervalued JBH significantly by 27.19%.
This significant difference can be due to the fact that this adjustment assumes that the differences in the multiples of the firms in our sample are due to a single fundamental factor.
-------------------------------------------------
4.2 Sector Regression
Since the differences in multiples are determined by a range of fundamental factors, we may regress the multiples of comparable firms in the retailing sector, VS, on the all the corresponding fundamental variables; growth, cost of capital, after-tax operating margin and reinvestment rate.
We can consider squaring the after-tax operating margin in our regression model to account for its non-linearity effect due to its direct and indirect effects.

Inputs for selected comparable firms in the retailing sector: Firms | Expected growth in operating income | Cost of Capital | Reinvestment rate | After-tax operating margin | JBH | 13.02% | 11.27% | 33.84% | 4.49% | DJS | 7.83% | 11.44% | 35.50% | 8.28% | HVN | 1.03% | 12.20% | 9.06% | 12.50% | MYR | 0.56% | 12.08% | 3.40% | 6.33% | SRA | 0.90% | 15.19% | 28.37% | 1.69% | WTF | 21.96% | 11.29% | 31.68% | 37.15% | WHS | 11.94% | 11.09% | 47.44% | 6.22% | BRG | -8.03% | 11.76% | -45.22% | 7.17% | FAN | 17.32% | 10.67% | 92.00% | 4.25% | TRS | 51.80% | 11.02% | 121.68% | 4.86% |

Estimated VS sector regression model:
VS = -0.3702486 (.689656)
+ 0.006907(Expected Growth) (.0088852)
+ 0.0804872(Cost of Capital) (.0571426)
- 0.0005454(Reinvestment rate) (.0029979)
+ 0.0051235(After-tax operating capital)2 (.0001692)
VSJBH = -0.3702486 + 0.006907(13.02) + 0.0804872(11.27) - 0.0005454(33.84) + 0.0051235(4.49)2 = 0.711698746
Implied JBH firm value
= 0.711698746 × 2731.60
= 1944.08 million
At its actual VS ratio of 0.7629, JBH appears to be undervalued by the market by 6.72%. This is a better model than the previous as the model has a higher r-squared, that is the change in dependent variables that is explained by changes in the independent variable.
A possible extentions of this analysis by transforming the dependent variable to a log variables, log(VS) in the regression model. It is often an appropriate choice for positive variables to satisfy the OLS assumptions more closely, eliminating problems of heteroskedasticity or skewed results, it make its distribution normal. Also it provides a more accurate representation of the effects of the independent variables on the dependent variable, with coefficient estimates that provide an approximate percentage change in VS rather than linear parameter value in the previous VS regression model. These coefficients give us an estimate that is always between the absolute value of the estimates for an increase and a decrease. Moreover, taking logs usually narrows the range of the variable, making estimates less sensitive to outliers on the dependent or independent variables.
Estimated log(VS) multiple regression model: log(VS) = -1.250702 (1.22859)
+ .010456(Expected Growth) (.0158285)
+ .0834727(Cost of Capital) (.1017968)
- .0028525(Reinvestment rate) (.0053406)
+ .0016417(After-tax operating capital)2 (.0003015) log(VSJBH) = -1.250702 + .010456(13.02)
+ .0834727(11.27) - .0028525(33.84)
+ .0016417(4.49)2 = -0.237073274
VSJBH = e-0.237073274 = 0.788933477
Implied JBH firm value
= 0.788933477 × 2731.60
= 2155.05 million
Share price
= 2155.05 million/109.36 million
= $19.71
Given that the VS in the recent financial year was actually 0.7629, we could say that the market was slightly overvalues the firm. However, this is a better VS regression model as the difference between actual and market predicted VS is closer, with JBH’s VS being 3.30% below market expectations.
Limitations of the data used in relative valuation regression model include that the sample size is not very large and that there is no guarantee that any sample will be precisely represent that sector from which it comes, when inferences are made for the firms in the market. Hence, a possible reason why the direction of the coefficients of the explanatory variables do not all match to expectations. A larger sample size would enable you to assume normality and also result in smaller standard deviations around estimate.

(E) RECOMMENDATION
-------------------------------------------------
1. Final Value Estimate The value obtained from the DDM is much higher than both FCFF discount model and relative valuation. DDM is not an appropriate model and is likely to overstate the value of equity as mentioned earlier. This is because share repurchase has been ignored which has a potential impact on the payout ratio, cost of equity and NI growth. Since the method is inaccurate and not appropriate given the volatility of the firms leverage, we assigned a weighting of 0.1 to our DDM value per share estimate. The value of JBH estimated from relative valuation is based on what the market is paying for similar firms. The sector regression model from which the value of the firm was estimated was based on a small sample size making it difficult to draw precise inferences and estimates of input parameters. Furthermore, it relies heavily on historical data, hence the effect of the fundamental factors hold. Thus we assign the relative estimated value a weighting of 0.1 in determining our final value. FCFF is the most appropriate model for firms with changing leverages over time. It embodies the effects of debt also avoids the need to account for JBH’s $173 million share repurchases. Given the higher reliability and accuracy we assigned a weighting of 0.8 to FCFF valuation in assessing our final value. Therefore;
Equity per share = $25.67(0.1) + $19.71(0.1) + $18.50(0.8) = $19.34
-------------------------------------------------
2. Recommendation
The current listed share price is 17.36.
Our valuation yields $19.34
The stock of JBH is currently undervalued in the market, hence it is recommended to purchase JBH stocks.

APPENDIX A - Free Cash Flow to Firm | | | | | | | | All values are in $ millions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A1 - Valuation Schedule | | | | | | | | | | | | Current year | High growth | | | | | | | Stable Growth | INPUTS REQUIRED | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ROC | 49.37% | 49.37% | 49.37% | 44.58% | 39.78% | 34.99% | 30.20% | 25.41% | 20.61% | 15.82% | Reinvestment rate | 27.26% | 27.26% | 27.26% | 26.08% | 24.91% | 23.73% | 22.56% | 21.38% | 20.21% | 19.03% | Expected growth | 13.45% | 13.46% | 13.46% | 11.63% | 9.91% | 8.30% | 6.81% | 5.43% | 4.16% | 3.01% | EBIT | $175.10 | $198.66 | $225.39 | $251.60 | $276.53 | $299.49 | $319.89 | $337.26 | $351.31 | $361.89 | (+)Operating Lease Expenses | $58.38 | $52.38 | $46.98 | $46.98 | $46.98 | $46.98 | $46.98 | $46.98 | $46.98 | $46.98 | (-)Lease Depreciation | $8.73 | $8.73 | $8.73 | $8.73 | $8.73 | $8.73 | $8.73 | $8.73 | $8.73 | $8.73 | Adj EBIT | $224.75 | $242.32 | $263.65 | $289.85 | $314.78 | $337.74 | $358.14 | $375.52 | $389.57 | $400.14 | Marginal Tax rate, t | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | Adj EBIT(1-t) | $157.33 | $169.62 | $184.55 | $202.90 | $220.35 | $236.42 | $250.70 | $262.86 | $272.70 | $280.10 | CASHFLOWS | | | | | | | | | | | FCFF | $114.45 | $123.39 | $134.25 | $149.98 | $165.47 | $180.32 | $194.15 | $206.66 | $217.60 | $226.80 | Terminal Cash Flow | | | | | | | | | $3,240.78 | | WACC | | | | | | | | | | | Cost of Equity Calculation | | | | | | | | | | | Treasury-bond rate (risk free rate) | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | Risk premium | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | Beta | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.24 | 1.23 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.19 | Cost of equity | 11.82% | 11.82% | 11.82% | 11.77% | 11.72% | 11.67% | 11.62% | 11.57% | 11.52% | 11.47% | Cost of Debt Calculation | | | | | | | | | | | Synthetic rating | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | Pre-tax cost of debt | 6.01% | 6.01% | 6.01% | 6.01% | 6.01% | 6.01% | 6.01% | 6.01% | 6.01% | 6.01% | (1-t) | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | After-tax cost of debt | 4.21% | 4.21% | 4.21% | 4.21% | 4.21% | 4.21% | 4.21% | 4.21% | 4.21% | 4.21% | WACC | | | | | | | | | | | Market Equity/Market Capital | 97.11% | 97.11% | 97.11% | 94.65% | 92.18% | 89.72% | 87.25% | 84.79% | 82.32% | 79.86% | Market Debt/Market Capital | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 5.35% | 7.82% | 10.28% | 12.75% | 15.21% | 17.68% | 20.14% | Cost of Capital (WACC) | 11.60% | 11.60% | 11.60% | 11.37% | 11.13% | 10.90% | 10.68% | 10.45% | 10.23% | 10.01% | Present Value of Cash Flows | | $110.56 | $107.79 | $108.58 | $108.47 | $107.47 | $105.63 | $103.05 | $99.84 | | Present Value of Terminal Cash Flow | | | | | | | | | $1,486.90 | | VALUATION | (million) | | | | | | | | | | Shares Outstanding | 109.36 | | | | | | | | | | PV of High Growth FCFF | $218.35 | | | | | | | | | | PV of Transition Period FCFF | $633.05 | | | | | | | | | | PV of Terminal Value | $1,486.90 | | | | | | | | | | Value of Operating Assets Today | $2,338.30 | | | | | | | | | | (+) Cash and marketable securities | $51.74 | | | | | | | | | | (-) Long and short Term Debt | $69.60 | | | | | | | | | | (-)Debt Value of Leases | $296.73 | | | | | | | | | | Value of Equity | $2,023.71 | | | | | | | | | | Value of Equity Per Share | $18.50 | | | | | | | | | |

Note 2010 data is obtained from JBH Annual Financial Report 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A2 - Earnings | 2010 | | | A7 - Minimum Lease Payment | | | | EBIT | $175.10 | | | Years | $million | Present Value | | | | (+) Operating lease expenses | $58.38 | | | 1 | $52.38 | $49.41 | | | | (-) Lease depreciation | $8.73 | | | 2 | $46.98 | $41.81 | | | | Adjusted EBIT | $224.75 | | | 3 | $46.98 | $39.44 | | | | Adj.EBIT(1-t) | $157.33 | | | 4 | $46.98 | $37.20 | | | | | | | | 5 | $46.98 | $35.09 | | | | A3 - Retention Rate Calculation, b | 2010 | | | 6 | $46.98 | $33.10 | | | | (+)capex | 55.85 | | | 7 | $46.98 | $31.23 | | | | (-)depreciation | 23.28 | | | 8 | $46.98 | $29.45 | | | | (+)acquisition | | 2.40 | | | Debt Value of Leases | $296.73 | | | | ∆NCWC
∆NCWC
(+) | 7.91 | | | Cost of Debt | 6.01% | | | | | Capital Reinvested | 42.88 | | | | | | | | | b = Capital Reinvested / Adj.EBIT(1-T) | 0.27 | | | A8 - Sensitivity Analysis | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Stable Cost of WACC (%) | | A4 - ROC Calculation | 2010 | | | stable ebit growth (%) | | 9.01 | 10.01 | 11.01 | | adj EBIT(1-T) (2010) | 157.33 | | | | 1.01 | 16.60 | 15.30 | 14.26 | | Bk Debt (2009) | 89.40 | | | | 2.01 | 18.38 | 16.70 | 15.39 | | Bk Equity(2009) | 229.30 | | | | 3.01 | 20.77 | 18.50 | 16.81 | | Capital Reinvested (2009) | 318.70 | | | | 4.01 | 24.11 | 20.91 | 18.62 | | ROC = Adj.EBIT(1-t) / Capital Reinvested | 0.49 | | | | 5.01 | 29.12 | 24.28 | 21.05 | | | | | | | | | | | | A5 - Growth Rate Calculation | 2010 | | | | | | | | | Retention Rate, b | 0.27 | | | | Years in High Growth | | ROC | 0.49 | | | stable ebit growth (%) | | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | | Growth Rate = ROC x b | 0.13 | | | | 1.01 | 14.10 | 15.30 | 16.52 | | | | | | | 2.01 | 15.48 | 16.70 | 17.95 | | A6 - Other Inputs | 2010 | | | | 3.01 | 17.25 | 18.50 | 19.78 | | Firm Beta | 1.26 | | | | 4.01 | 19.61 | 20.91 | 22.23 | | Industry Beta | 1.19 | | | | 5.01 | 22.92 | 24.28 | 25.66 | | | | | | | | | | | | Year | 2009 | 2010 | | | | | | | | Total Capital Invested | 318.7 | 362.90 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

APPENDIX B - Dividend Discount Model | | | | | | | | All values in $million | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | B1 - Valuation Schedule | | | | | | | | | | | | Current year | High growth | | | Transitional Period | | | | Stable Growth | INPUTS REQUIRED | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ROC | 49.37% | 49.37% | 49.37% | 44.57% | 39.78% | 34.99% | 30.20% | 25.40% | 20.61% | 15.82% | Average (interest expense/Total Debt(BV)) | 7.30% | 7.30% | 7.30% | 7.30% | 7.30% | 7.30% | 7.30% | 7.30% | 7.30% | 7.30% | Debt (BK) / Equity (BK) | 23.73% | 23.73% | 23.73% | 24.19% | 24.66% | 25.12% | 25.59% | 26.05% | 26.52% | 26.98% | ROE | 51.74% | 51.74% | 51.74% | 54.12% | 48.33% | 42.50% | 36.62% | 30.69% | 24.72% | 18.71% | Payout Ratio | 60.14% | 60.14% | 60.14% | 61.55% | 62.96% | 64.37% | 65.78% | 67.18% | 68.59% | 70.00% | Retention Rate | 39.86% | 39.86% | 39.86% | 38.45% | 37.04% | 35.63% | 34.22% | 32.82% | 31.41% | 30.00% | Earnings Growth | 20.62% | 20.62% | 20.62% | 20.81% | 17.90% | 15.14% | 12.53% | 10.07% | 7.77% | 5.61% | EPS | $1.10 | $1.32 | $1.60 | $1.93 | $2.27 | $2.62 | $2.95 | $3.24 | $3.50 | $3.69 | DPS | $0.66 | $0.80 | $0.96 | $1.19 | $1.43 | $1.69 | $1.94 | $2.18 | $2.40 | $2.58 | | | | | | | | | | $44.11 | | Cost of Equity | | | | | | | | | | | Treasury-bond rate (risk free rate) | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | 5.51% | Risk premium | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | 5.01% | Beta | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.24 | 1.23 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.19 | Cost of equity | 11.82% | 11.82% | 11.82% | 11.77% | 11.72% | 11.67% | 11.62% | 11.57% | 11.52% | 11.47% | Present Value of Dividends | | $0.71 | $0.77 | $0.85 | $0.92 | $0.97 | $1.00 | $1.01 | $1.00 | | Present Value of Terminal Price | | | | | | | | | $18.43 | | Valuation | | | | | | | | | | | Present Value of High Growth Dividends | $1.48 | | | | | | | | | | Present Value of Transitional Period Dividend | $5.76 | | | | | | | | | | Present Value of Terminal Price | $18.43 | | | | | | | | | | Value of Equity Per Share | $25.67 | | | | | | | | | |

APPENDIX C – Operating Leases | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating lease payment commitments in future years | | | | Time | ($millions) | | | < 1 year | 52.384 | | | 1 – 5 years | 187.934 | | | > 5 years | 113.569 | | | | | | | Assuming that the operating rental commitment due 1-5 years are distributed equally over the years 2011-2014. | | Yearly payments (187.934/4) | 46.984 | | | | | | | For the payment period beyond year 5, we assume that operating lease payments are equally distributed, equal to operating lease commitment due in year 5. | Payment period beyond year 5 (113.569/46.984) | 3 | (rounded off for calculation) | | Total payment period (5+3) | 8 | | | | | | | Complete operating lease payment schedule ($millions) | | | | Time | Lease Expense | Present Value (@6.01% Cost of Debt) | | 1 | 52.384 | $49.41 | | 2 | 46.984 | $41.81 | | 3 | 46.984 | $39.44 | | 4 | 46.984 | $37.20 | | 5 | 46.984 | $35.09 | | 6 | 46.984 | $33.10 | | 7 | 46.984 | $31.23 | | 8 | 46.984 | $29.45 | | Debt Value of Leases | | $296.73 | | | | | | Depreciation of lease asset is assumed to be straight line through the life of the lease, therefore equal to $8.727 million for future periods. | | Appendix D - Free Cash Flow to Equity | | | | | | | | All values are in $ millions | | | | | | | | | | *Values obtained from Finanalysis | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | INPUTS REQUIRED | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | | | | | Net Income | 25.81 | 40.39 | 65.08 | 94.44 | 118.65 | | | | | Capex | 29.05 | 34.41 | 51.57 | 44.44 | 56.85 | | | | | Depreciation | 7.44 | 10.85 | 14.74 | 18.75 | 23.28 | | | | | Change in NCWC | 14.32 | -2.54 | 41.52 | -25.56 | 7.91 | | | | | Debt ratio | 12.31% | 8.32% | 13.08% | 3.25% | 2.89% | | | | | CALCULATING CASHFLOWS | | | | | | | | | | FCFE | -$5.70 | $21.12 | -$3.03 | $94.31 | $78.37 | | | | | Dividends Paid | $7.86 | $11.51 | $27.58 | $47.18 | $71.50 | | | | | Dividends / FCFE | -138.01% | 54.50% | -911.63% | 50.02% | 91.23% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Goldman Sachs JBH Report 2011
[ 2 ]. Appendix D
[ 3 ]. Appendix B – B5 Interest Calculation
[ 4 ]. http://www.jbhifi.com.au/documents/news/_2011-03-29_9-09-02.pdf
[ 5 ]. http://www.jbhifi.com.au/documents/news/_2011-05-16_8-08-18.pdf
[ 6 ]. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=JBH:AU 17/05/2010
[ 7 ]. Appendix B – B4 Payout Ratio
[ 8 ]. Macquarie Conference Presentation 2011, http://www.jbhifi.com.au/documents/reports/_2010-06-02_9-09-10.pdf
[ 9 ]. http://www.jbhifi.com.au/about-us/
[ 10 ]. http://savingpoint.com.au/expense-reduction/red-blue-and-yellow-a-short-business-tale-609
[ 11 ]. Macquarie Conference Presentation 2011, http://www.jbhifi.com.au/documents/reports/_2010-06-02_9-09-10.pdf
[ 12 ]. , http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/ - Growth Rate Estimation
[ 13 ]. http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/business/items/201102/s3132482.html
[ 14 ]. http://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/tables/index.html#interest_rates - Government bonds.
[ 15 ]. We use the US Market because it is a mature market with a long history of data.
[ 16 ]. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/histretSP.html - Historical Risk Premium
[ 17 ]. SE=σ/√n
[ 18 ]. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/ctryprem.html - Country Spread & Risk Premium
[ 19 ]. Finanalysis - JBH
[ 20 ]. http://finance.ninemsn.com.au/news-and-markets/company/financials?code=JBH
[ 21 ]. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/Betas.html. – Levered & Unlevered Betas.
Note: we use values from damodoran rather than Finanalysis for industry levels because beta from Finanalysis refers to the entire retail sector rather than the niche market of retail that JBH is part of.
[ 22 ]. ke,current=5.51%+1.265.01%=11.28%
[ 23 ]. ke,stable=5.51%+1.195.01%=11.47%
[ 24 ]. Appendix A – A1 Valuation Schedule
[ 25 ]. 5.51%+0.50%×0.7=4.2% See also Appendix A.
[ 26 ]. Interest coverage = EBIT/interest exp = 175.1/5.5 =31.8
[ 27 ]. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/Betas.html
[ 28 ]. http://www.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pc/datasets/restcompfirm.xls - JBH Data
[ 29 ]. (MV Debt / MV Capital) = 1 - (MV Equity / MV Capital)
[ 30 ]. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/wacc.htm - WACC
[ 31 ]. WACC=11.82%97.11%+4.21%2.89%=11.60%
[ 32 ]. WACC=11.47%79.86%+4.21%20.14%=10.01% See also Appendix A.
[ 33 ]. Damodoran, A 2002, Investment Valuation:Tools & Techniques for Determining the Value of any Asset, 2nd edn, John Wiley and Sons, New York, p282.
[ 34 ]. http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-business/australias-economic-growth-surges-20100526-wc7o.html
[ 35 ]. Appendix A and C
[ 36 ]. Appendix A – A1 Valuation Schedule
[ 37 ]. NCWC = Non-Cash Working Capital
[ 38 ]. Appendix A – A3 Retention Rate
Note: by assuming linear decrease in retention rate we assume a changing composition of Net Capex and NCWC as well.
[ 39 ]. Appendix A – A1 Valuation Schedule
[ 40 ]. Appendix A – A1 Valuation Schedule
[ 41 ]. Debt = Debt Value of Leases + 2010 BV of Debt.
[ 42 ]. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=JBH:AU
[ 43 ]. Appendix B – B3 ROE calculation
[ 44 ]. Appendix B – B5 interest Calculation
Note: i is the average interest expense to total debt (BV) worked out by examining book values between 2003 and 2010.
[ 45 ]. Appendix B – B4 Payout Ratio
[ 46 ]. http://www.jbhifi.com.au/documents/news/_2011-03-29_9-09-02.pdf
[ 47 ]. Appendix B – B1 Valuation Schedule
[ 48 ]. Appendix B – B1 Valuation Schedule
[ 49 ]. Appendix B – Valuation Schedule
[ 50 ]. Appendix B – Valuation Schedule
[ 51 ]. Appendix B – Valuation Schedule
[ 52 ]. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/enterprisevaluesales.asp
[ 53 ]. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/psdata.html
[ 54 ]. Finanalysis: Annual Ratio Analysis – JBH, DJS, HVN, MYR, SRA, WTF, WHS, BRG
[ 55 ]. Finanalysis: Annual Profit and Loss – JBH, DJS, HVN, MYR, SRA, WTF, WHS, BRG
[ 56 ]. Statistical numbers provided by Finanalysis are used in calculation in appendix: http://www.aspectfinancial.com.au
[ 57 ]. Expected growth = Reinvestment rate × ROC
ROC = After-tax operating margin × Sales/ Invested Capital
[ 58 ]. Reinvestment rate = (Capex – Depreciation + Change in Non-cash Working Capital)/EBIT(1-t)
[ 59 ]. After-tax operating margin = EBIT(1-t)/Sales
[ 60 ]. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=JBH:AU - 17/04/11…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Career Report Marketing Research Analyst

...Planning Career Report 29 October 2012 Career Report Marking Research Analyst What they do: * Monitor and forecast marketing and sales trends * Measure the effectiveness of marketing programs and strategies * Devise and evaluate methods for collecting data, such as surveys, questionnaires, or opinion polls * Gather data about consumers, competitors, and market conditions * Analyze data using statistical software * Convert complex data and findings into understandable tables, graphs, and written reports * Prepare reports and present results to clients or management Important skills: Analytical skills: Market research analysts must be able to understand large amounts of data and information. Communication skills: Market research analysts need strong communication skills when gathering information and interpreting and presenting results to clients.  Critical-thinking skills: Market research analysts must assess all available information and use it to determine what marketing strategy would work best for a company. Detail oriented: Market research analysts must be detail......

Words: 663 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Mexichem 2011 Annual Report

...transformando nuestro mundo para un mejor futuro INFORME ANUAL CEMEX 2011 siguiente> para continuar construyendo el futuro ÍNDICE 2> DATOS FINANCIEROS RELEVANTES 3> CARTA A LOS ACCIONISTAS 5> TRANSFORMANDO NUESTRO MUNDO 12> INFORMACIÓN FINANCIERA SELECTA CONSOLIDADA 14> NUESTRA EMPRESA 17> DISCUSIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE RESULTADOS 18> RESUMEN GLOBAL DE OPERACIONES 22> INICIATIVAS DE MERCADOS DE CAPITAL Y OTROS EVENTOS RELEVANTES 25> ESTADOS FINANCIEROS 105> TÉRMINOS QUE UTILIZAMOS 106> CONSEJO DE ADMINISTRACIÓN 107> COMITÉ EJECUTIVO 109> INFORMACIÓN PARA MEDIOS E INVERSIONISTAS CEMEX está enfocado en una rigurosa transformación para aprovechar el valor aún no capturado en toda nuestra organización y para recuperar nuestra posición como el líder de creación de valor de nuestra industria. Mediante la transformación de nuestra empresa, haciéndola más eficiente, más ágil, más emprendedora y más enfocada al cliente, nos preparamos para un futuro de crecimiento rentable y sustentable. CEMEX es una compañía global de materiales para la industria de la construcción que ofrece productos de alta calidad y servicios confiables a clientes y comunidades en más de 50 países del mundo. CEMEX mantiene su trayectoria de beneficiar a quienes sirve a través de la constante búsqueda de soluciones innovadoras para la industria, mejoras en eficiencia y promoviendo un futuro sustentable. Paseo Marítimo de la Playa del Poniente de Benidorm en España 10,000 metros cúbicos de concreto......

Words: 71372 - Pages: 286

Premium Essay

Annual Report of Toyota for 2011

...Rewarded with a smile by exceeding your expectations Annual Report 2011 Year ended March 31, 2011 TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION Leading the way to the future of mobility A future mobility that links people with products and services Toyota's Global Vision not only calls for building better cars, but also expresses our goal of contributing to the creation of better communities. Toyota is developing new products and services for the future of mobility, with the goal of realizing practical, low-carbon mobility; new lifestyles; broad application of environmental technologies and infrastructure for safer mobility. Fruit Fruit Ever-better cars Develop vehicles that exceed expectations Enriching lives of communities Contribute to communities Contribute to the future of mobility Sustainable growth Constantly strive for the "ever-better cars" and "enriching lives of communities" goals by ensuring sustainable profitability with a long-term point of view. Trunk Stable business base Roots Toyota values The Toyoda Precepts Guiding Principles at Toyota The Toyota Way Tomorrow's environment-friendly vehicles, new business activities 2 Meeting challenging goals by engaging talents and passion Building cars that meet the needs of people in every region Toyota seeks to build ever-better cars that meet the needs of consumers and society, based on our principles of “customerfirst,” “genchi genbutsu” (onsite, handson experience) and “good quality,......

Words: 79115 - Pages: 317

Free Essay

2011 Kia Annual Report

...2011 영업보고서 C o n t e n t s 06 Chairman’s message 08 ViCe Chairman’s message 10 FinanCial reView 기아자동차는 2011년 쉽지 않은 국내외 경영환경에도 불구하고 전년 대비 19% 성장하며 역대 최고의 성과를 달성하였습니다. 글로벌 경영, 디자인 경영, 그리고 지속가능경영으로 기아자동차는 새로운 미래, 더 나은 내일을 향해 질주하고 있습니다. 2010년에 이어 다시 한번 세계 10대 자동차 메이커 반열에 합류하며 진정한 글로벌 기업으로 도약하고 있는 기아자동차. 재무성과에서 뿐만 아니라 국내외 유수의 디자인 어워드 수상, 브랜드 가치 상승 등을 통해 지속성장의 기반을 다져가고 있습니다. 추후에도 기아자동차는 빠르게 변화하는 시장을 선도하며 고객의 기대를 뛰어넘는 새로운 가치를 지속적으로 창출하며 활력과 즐거움을 제공하는 기업으로 거듭나기 위해 최선을 다할 것입니다. 2011 영업보고서 Chairman’s Message 세계적인 자동차 메이커이자 모범적인 기업시민으로서 지속가능한 성장을 이루어 나가겠습니다. 06 Kia motors Chairman’s message 지난 2011년은 현대자동차 그룹의 위상을 더욱 공고히 하는 매우 의미있는 한 해였습니다. 현대 기아차는 세계 시 장에서 5대 자동차 메이커로서의 위상을 더욱 확고히 하였습니다. 그러나 2012년은 유럽 재정위기와 세계 경기 침체로 인해 자동차 산업의 성장세는 둔화되고, 업체간 경쟁은 더욱 치열해 질 것으로 예상됩니다. 따라서, 올해는 보다 내실 있는 경영활동을 통해 글로벌 일류 기업으로 도약하기 위한 기반을 다지고자 합니다. 이 를 위해서 그 동안 꾸준히 추진해 온 품질경영을 더욱 강화해야 하며, 이를 통해 고객에게 만족과 감동을 주는 품질 의 고급화에 더욱 주력해 나갈 것입니다. 아울러, 현대자동차 그룹은 소외된 계층을 보살피는 사회공헌과 협력업체와 공생발전을 위한 활동을 더욱 강화하 여, 국가 경제와 사회발전에 공헌하는 모범적인 기업이 되도록 최선의 노력을 다할 것 입니다. 또한, 우리 기아자동차는 금년 한해 사업목표 달성과 함께, 미래를 대비하는 마음으로 중장기전략인 “기아비전 2016”을 수립하였으며, 차질없이 진행해 나갈 것입니다. 기아자동차는 위기를 기회로 만드는 불굴의 도전정신과 무한한 잠재력이 있습니다. 미래를 향한 꿈과 열정으로 모 든 임직원이 한마음 한 뜻으로 다시 한번 도약하는 뜻깊은 한 해를 만들어 나가겠습니다. 감사합니다. 회장 정몽구 07 2011 영업보고서 Vice Chairman’s Message 존경하는 주주 여러분 제68기 정기 주주총회를 맞아 지난 한 해 동안 기아자동차에 성원을 아끼지 않으신 주주 여 러분께 진심으로 감사의 말씀을 드립니다. 주주 여러분! 2011년은 일본 대지진, 아중동 민주화 시위, 유럽발 경제 위기 등 유난히 큰 사건 사고가......

Words: 4508 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Staples 2011 Annual Report

...2011 Annual Report Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement We bring easy to your office. Staples is the world’s largest office products company and y a trusted source for office solutions. The company proy Revenue Mix2 2008 2007 2009 North American Delivery North American Retail vides products, services and expertise in office supplies, copy & print, technology, facilities and breakroom, and furniture. Staples invented the office superstore concept in 1986 and has annua sales Revenues ($B)1 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2010 2011 Diluted Earnings Per Share 3 in the world in eCommerce sales. With 88,000 associates worldwide, Staples operates in 26 countries throughout North and South America, Europe, Asia and Australia, making it easy for businesses y r of all sizes and consumers. f The company is headquartered outside Boston. More information about Staples (Nasdaq: SPLS) is available at www.staples.com/media. Cash Flow Generation ($M) of $25 billion, ranking second f Operating Cash Flow 2007 As Adjusted 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2008 2009 2010 2011 Free Cash Flow Capita Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Stores Open at Fiscal Year End 2007 Dividends Per Share 2008 2009 2010 2011 1 2 2008 revenues include $4.2 billion of revenues from Corporate Express for the period July 2008–January 2009. f 2008 revenue mix includes $2.3 billion of North American Delivery...

Words: 117583 - Pages: 471

Premium Essay

Ge Annual Report 2011

...is tested for impairment using a fair value methodology”. GE tested all of their goodwill for impairment as of January 1, 2002, and 1.204 billion dollars that all related to equipment and other services was recorded as a non-cash charge. Several factors that contributed to the impairment charge include; a difficult economic environment in the information technology sector, and high price competition in the auto insurance industry. The change from the previous goodwill impairment policy that was based on undiscounted cash flows to the new policy for goodwill that is based on a fair value is a clear example of GE’s accounting flexibility. ACCOUNTING STRATEGY According to the amount of flexibility that is present, a company may choose to report financial information either aggressively or conservatively. - 23 - Conservative accounting tends to give customers a more accurate description of true value. GE uses a conservative strategy to retain trust in their company and to promote their customer focused growth agenda. Because of GE’s size and market capitalization, it is often the benchmark in accounting policies in the conglomerate industry. Many policies utilized by GE demonstrate accounting conservatism. GE records sales of goods when a firm sales agreement is in place, delivery has occurred, and collectibility of the fixed or determinable sales price is reasonably assured. If customer acceptance of products is not assured, sales are recorded only upon formal......

Words: 12673 - Pages: 51

Premium Essay

Jewelry Report 2011

...Jewelry Report 2011 The Ultimate Guide to the Consumer Market for Fine and Costume Jewelry In 2010, the U.S. jewelry market emerged from the recession, posting a dramatic 7.5 percent increase in consumer expenditures from 2009 to 2010, after two successive years of declining sales. Yet the jewelry market today is very different than it was back in 2006 and 2007 before the recession. Jewelry makers and retailers expecting to pick up where they left off with the same products targeting the same consumers will find themselves in the lurch. This according to Unity Marketing's latest Jewelry Report 2011, a new market research study based upon surveys conducted among recent jewelry buyers. In 2010 the jewelry market recovered from the recession -- But the post-recession jewelry market doesn't look anything like the pre-recession market "Since 2006 Unity Marketing has tracked dramatic changes in product and shopping preferences in the jewelry market," explains Pam Danziger, president of Unity Marketing and author of Putting the Luxe Back in Luxury: How new consumer values are redefining the way we market luxury (Paramount Market Publishing, 2011). "Among the most profound shifts the research uncovered is the growing demand for men's jewelry. Over two-thirds of the growth in the jewelry market from 2008 to 2010 is directly attributable to increased expenditures on men's jewelry." "The men's jewelry market pre-recession was so small that it was difficult to make......

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Cb-Annual Report 2011

...2011 Annual Report at every occasion chaiRman’S letteR In an era of constant, rapid and unpredictable change, the concept of staying the course, especially in business, can seem like an impossible mission. It takes strong and confident leadership, a clear and focused strategy and a team of talented people who are willing to go the distance in order to achieve the goal. Since fiscal 2010, the goal at Constellation Brands has been a singular one: profitable organic growth. During this period, we have embarked on an evolutionary journey that has taken us from a collection of stellar brands and acquired businesses to a highly disciplined and tightly aligned company that is, at every occasion, capitalizing on company-wide efficiencies and best practices to strengthen our operations, our people and our brands. Our fiscal 2011 results serve as a shining indicator that our collective efforts are paying off. More importantly, they validate the importance of staying true to one’s commitments. At Constellation Brands, our commitments are unwavering…to continue to grow our business and our premium brands, to enrich the communities where we live and work and to elevate life with every glass raised. These commitments are being realized every day because of our people, who are among the best and brightest in the industry. Dedicated, innovative and determined, our employees have stayed the course through unexpected challenges and increasingly higher expectations placed on them. We......

Words: 59029 - Pages: 237

Premium Essay

Financial Analyst Report

...Financial Analyst Report Furman Glass Prof. Arlene Goodman ACCT614-1302A-06 Colorado Technical University April 15, 2013 Abstract Financial Analyst Report The associates of a corporation’s board of directors and executive management team are liable for establishing the policy, procedures and are eventually accountable to stockholders for the financial well-being of the corporation. Too successfully conduct their responsibilities, panel associates must have appropriate data in the structure of financial statements or narrates that afford a complete summary of the corporation’s financial position. The fundamental material associates of a board of directors and executive management team members require to make a comprehensive decision on the operating future and standing of the Corporation are located in four essential financial statements. These statements are the balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement and the statement of shareholders’ equity. Annual accounts of all must be encompassed in the corporation’s yearly statement (Gillett, (n.d.)). Provisional reports of the financial statements are likewise beneficial to a board of directors and executive management team and they are produced typically on a quarterly agenda. Obviously, the board associates will utilize these various statements and other financial accounts to reach a comprehensive decision. Nonetheless, the four essential financial reports afford the summarizing material......

Words: 1874 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

British Airways Annual Report 2011

...Airways Plc Annual Report and Accounts Year ended 31 December 2011 Company registration number: 1777777 Contents Officers and professional advisers 1 Directors’ report and business review Business review Management review Financial review Internal controls and risk management Directors’ report 2 4 6 9 Directors’ responsibilities statement in relation to the financial statements 12 Independent auditors’ report 13 Group financial statements Group consolidated income statement Statement of other comprehensive Income Balance sheets Cash flow statements Statement of changes in equity Notes to the accounts Operating and financial statistics Fleet table Principal investments Glossary Subsidiary undertakings 14 15 16 17 18 19 75 77 78 79 80 British Airways Plc Officers and professional advisers Directors Sir Martin Broughton (Chairman) Alison Reed (Deputy Chairman) Keith Williams (Chief Executive Officer) Nick Swift (Chief Financial Officer) Andrew Crawley Frank van der Post Rafael Sánchez-Lozano Turmo Enrique Dupuy de Lôme Ken Smart Gavin Patterson Secretary Alan Buchanan Registered office Waterside PO Box 365 Harmondsworth UB7 0GB Parent company International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. Calle Velazquez 130 Madrid, 28006 Spain Independent auditors Ernst & Young LLP 1 More London Place London SE1 2AF 1 British Airways Plc Directors’ report and business review The Directors present their annual report and the audited......

Words: 39646 - Pages: 159

Premium Essay

Avon Company 2011 Annual Report

...challenges which have slowed the company’s recent revenue growth. In 2011, revenues were up 4% or 1% in constant dollars,* compared with the mid-single digit constant-dollar growth we have seen on average over the past five years. At the same time, Avon posted approximately $1.2 billion adjusted operating profit* and generated over $650 million in cash from operating activities. In line with this, we declared a $0.92 dividend in 2011 and stated our commitment to maintain this dividend in 2012. MOVING FORWARD Looking ahead to 2012, we are moving forward with urgency to get the company back on a growth track as quickly as we can. In line with this, we have undertaken a full long-range operational and financial review of the business, evaluating all external and internal factors that are impacting our performance. While we’re delaying any major, long-term strategic decisions until a new CEO is on board, we are taking immediate actions to reignite direct-selling momentum; cut costs; strengthen cash flow; and improve overall operating and management effectiveness. * Constant dollars and adjusted operating profi t are non-GAAP measures described under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in the MD&A. For a reconciliation of adjusted operating profi t, see “Results of Continuing Operations – Consolidated” in the MD&A. 2011 Annual Repor t By far our most critical priority is to accelerate top-line revenue growth. In 2011, we saw strong direct-selling performances in a number of key......

Words: 59497 - Pages: 238

Premium Essay

Sustainability Report - Arcelormittal 2011

...ArcelorMittal 2011 Executive Summary The underlying challenge for human organizations in the 21st century is to build and preserve a sustainable combination/blend of economic, social, and environmental conditions in a progressive global and commercial society. However, it is a challenge that is not being met at present. Currently it is failing to meet even the basic needs of the society, or to protect its natural resources and the ecosystems that produce them, even as it creates unprecedented wealth and amenities for a few. The reasons for these failures lie in both economic and political institutions. Sustainable Enterprises pioneers established concepts and tools for implementing eco-efficiency measures and also show how to use them immediately to reap business worth. Business enterprises in turn must quantify themselves against a “triple bottom line” which includes social value, environmental and economic profit. ArcelorMittal is one such company that has implemented eco-efficiency measures and realized the business benefits. Monitoring Systems Monitoring is a systematic and on-going activity which involves collecting, recording and reporting information. Monitoring systems for any organisation should be developed for three dimensions based on the triple bottom line. Monitoring Systems for Planet Monitoring systems and eco-tracking help to answer some fundamental questions:   What are the company‟s big environmental impacts? When and where do those impacts arise?......

Words: 3389 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Qantas Annual Report 2011

...Building a stronger Qantas Annual Report 2011 4 6 8 10 14 16 22 31 49 110 120 Chairman’s Report CEO’s Report Financial Performance Board of Directors Information on Qantas Review of Operations Corporate Governance Statement Directors’ Report Financial Report Sustainability Report Financial Calendar A STRONG PERFORMANCE IN CHALLENGING CONDITIONS THE QANTAS GROUP IN 2011 In 2010/2011 the Qantas Group reported a strong result in a complex and challenging global operating environment, with increased revenue across all business segments. The result was achieved while overcoming a series of natural disasters and operational disruptions, and despite the underperformance of Qantas’ international business. THE AVIATION INDUSTRY IS CHANGING THE QANTAS GROUP IN 2011 The Qantas Group faces a unique range of challenges and opportunities. We are in a strong position to address the challenges and realise the opportunities – but we must take decisive action, as we have throughout our history. SAFETY IS ALWAYS THE QANTAS GROUP’S FIRST PRIORITY WE INVEST $1.5 BILLION IN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE EACH YEAR SAFETY FIRST From our response to the QF32 incident to the risks posed by volcanic ash disruptions, we never compromise on the highest standards of safety. A safety-first culture across the Group ensures that risks are identified and addressed swiftly and decisively. We invest hundreds of millions of dollars in training to ensure that when incidents do occur our people......

Words: 63992 - Pages: 256

Premium Essay

Clothing Report 2011

...Bharatbook.com has this special report, which sources information for This Key Note Market Report examines the UK clothing retailing market, which comprises of women’s, men’s and children’s clothes, as well as clothing accessories. This Key Note Market Report examines the UK clothing retailing market, which comprises of women’s, men’s and children’s clothes, as well as clothing accessories. Consumer spending on clothing increased by 12.5% between 2006 and 2010, which was slightly below the rate at which overall consumer expenditure increased (12.9%). In 2010, it was estimated that the clothing retailing market was worth £41.9bn, which was the highest value seen over the review period. Key Note believes that supermarkets have increased their share of the clothing market, now accounting for around 25% of the total market. Supermarket retailers have witnessed a large increase in sales since the recession, as consumers became more cautious about unnecessary spending, and turn to cheaper alternatives available in the supermarkets. There has also been a decline in specialist companies operating within the clothing retailing industry, with figures from National Statistics indicating that, in 2010, there were 11,800 shops, compared to 12,700 in 2009; this represents a 7.1% decrease over the course of that year. This phenomenon is visible in many UK cities, where an increase in empty high-street shops is apparent. Many independent shops were forced to exit the market after the......

Words: 819 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Kia 2011 Annual Report

...AnnuAl RepoRt 2011 _ In 2011, we responded the way smart companies should in the face of the continuing global economic crisis by aligning our resources to meet the evolving needs of our customers and lead market changes. As a result, we achieved excellent results despite the challenging business environment by recording 2.478 million units in global retail sales, which is an 18.6% increase from the previous year. Kia Motors has consistently driven toward a better future through global management, design management and sustainable management. And now we are paving the way toward the future of mobility and greater value for all of our stakeholders. Contents 02~08 16~25 26~37 financial Highlights 02 & 2011 at a Glance Chairman’s message 06 Vice Chairman’s message 08 our PerformanCe Domestic Business Performance 18 overseas Business Performance 20 Global awards List 24 our strenGtHs Design management 28 Branding 32 marketing 34 2011 new models 36 38~47 48~121 our future research & Development 40 Global r&D network 44 eco-friendly models 46 & Concept Cars financial review 48 Product Line-up 114 Company History 116 Board of Directors 118 Global network 120 finanCiaL HiGHLiGHts 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 30,255,179 26,275,144 25,962,876 25,583,550 19,461,002 3,934,169 2,914,146 2,792,286 1,408,847 1,156,943 Current......

Words: 36900 - Pages: 148