Free Essay

Gun Control

In: Social Issues

Submitted By gillzacharys
Words 3957
Pages 16
Jonathan Schwartz
Prof: F, Gomez
Eng 1A
11-15-13
The Power of the Media to Shape Our Perceptions and Understanding of Reality on Gun Control
Introduction

The wake of gun violence in the United States has seen various proposals on how to handle the gun issue. Occasionally, people have woken up to shocking incidences of gun violence on various quarters. Perhaps the most outrageous incidents are the ones that involved shooting of school going children by a fellow student, seemingly unstable, or at least for that moment. It is important to note that in these incidences, the media coverage of the live happenings have always been extensive, giving the perpetrator of such violence a lot of fame. Various segments of the society have reacted to such incidences with diverging and converging opinions on what should be the best way forward. While the Obama administration has been on the forefront proposing stringent measures for the purposes of reducing or eliminating repeat occurrence, Republicans have a different view on how to address the whole matter. Religious groups and civil society have not spoken in one voice although one may deduce that everyone desires some changes in regards to how the whole issue should be addressed.

Some of the emerging schools of thought that have come out have to do with logic behind issuance of guns, the ethical and practical implications of the solutions proposed for adoption as policy. Probably the big challenge is that the incidences that have occurred cannot qualify to be categorized as organized crimes. They are spontaneous reactions from private citizens with unforeseeable emotional and psychological instabilities. This has made generalizations very difficult. It has even begged the question whether first time offenders of gun violence can be treated as criminals or patients unlucky enough to be roaming outside instead of being attended to in mental programs.

The media is one of the most powerful tools with regards to the flow of information. Most people have a lot of trust in the media. The view of the media is considered by many to be the right view. For this reason, it is easy to manipulate the public through various media platforms. Over the years, politicians and law makers as well as various governments have used this blind trust that the audiences have to propagate different agendas. This aspect of blind trust has been described by Robertson Davies in the following quote, “The eyes sees only what the mind is prepared to comprehend” (Davies). This quote insinuates that the media has the tendency to change the view of its audience, their attitudes, level of knowledge, and ideal about overall subject. Gun control is one of the most commonly discussed subjects by the media. However, this subject has been discussed in an impartial manner. In other words, the media has not been able to discuss both sides of gun control matter. This paper shall analyze the effect of media on people’s perception of gun control.

Background

In the American society, gun control issues have now topped the list of communication trends. Incidents such as Virginia Tech University (2007), Tucson Arizona (2011), movie theatre at Aurora Colorado (2012), Newtown Connecticut (2013) etc. have been made the topic of discussion in many media broadcast sessions. Consequently, these media broadcasts have shaped biased perspective regarding gun control Different people have varied views with regard to the gun control debate. Most of these views are directly related to the hype on gun control propagated by the media. After the incident in New Connecticut, the enforcement of the gun control laws took a different turn. The following graph that appeared on edition.cnn.com under the heading How Media Lose Interest in gun control by Danny Hayes indicates the trend of coverage of gun control by different media news channels (Hayes, Why this gun control debate has been different)

[pic]
Figure 1: Graph showing the news coverage of gun control (Hayes, Why this gun control debate has been different). It is very important to understand the issue of gun control while discussing various arguments and debates over the topic in detail. In this way, readers will be able to form a clear understanding of the proposed argument. It is expected that this will help the readers to form a neutral stance regarding the subject and form a rational perception. This research paper is a proposal argument, which seeks to understand the role of media in shaping up the perception of public regarding the issue of “Gun Control”. The paper will also provide and suggest some recommendations, after addressing the issue in detail.

Thesis Statement
The role of media regarding the issue of gun control is biased and also accomplishes the following. • The media makes people feel as if they support violence and senseless killings if they are not for gun control. • It is the media provides terrorists or psychopaths with an incentive to become the center of attention and become famous. • Providing consumers with false information / misconception regarding gun control. • The media is influencing the public in the wrong direction regarding the topic, the information they churn out suggests that gun control is the only way to curb supposed rise in violence.
Arguments in Support of the Thesis Fredrick E Allan writing for the Forbes magazine in an article tilted Gun Control: The Congress of Cowards referred to the lawmakers as cowards when they shot down the bill on background check for guns. Elizabeth Flock wrote an article on usnews.com under the title Gun control debate clouds the definition of mentally ill claiming that gun control advocated for gun violence through research done at John Hopkins. Senator Joe Lieberman said that the American people will continue hearing the screams of the people who died in New Connecticut until action was taken. The senator was talking to fox news on the topic of gun control. Fox news Sunday reported Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, a gun rights advocate saying that it would have been better if the principal of Sandy Hook elementary school had an M4. It was noted that different media houses followed the bandwagon of gun control campaigns. Different campaigns on gun control were designed by the media organizations to pose as the sole reason behind the violence. In addition, these campaigns which are broadcast everyday on various channels across the country changed the perspective of American citizens. Another impact is that it has allowed terrorists and other dangerous non-state elements to gain popularity. Gun control is not a minor issue, and it should be brought to the attention of the concerned authorities but in a proper manner. No one has ever proposed to completely abolish media coverage over the topic of gun control, but at the same time it is the duty of this society to fulfill its responsibility and curtail the issue in the best possible manner. The media advocacy for strict gun control was heightened after the incidence in New Connecticut. The assumption that possession of guns is the only reason behind such incidences is wrong. Studies have shown that untreated mental illness may result to violent activities. The increase in coverage of violent scenes by the media gives a platform for the publicity of these people. It is important for the media to ensure that they are responsible in the manner by which they convey the information to the public. According to an article which was published for “The Week”; the author has questioned this issue. The author Mat Lewis has questioned the purpose of gun control. According to the article, the extinction of mankind is not dependent on guns alone. According to an article on newsbusters.org titled Gun control? How about media control the author Matthew Sheffield says that the media should not assume that the core issue behind terrorist’s attacks is the availability of guns alone. This is just one of the factors which also contribute to such disastrous events (Sheffield). According to an article on globalsearch.ca under the title Violence: The American Way of Life, the author John Kozy says that the American society has been a violent society as it has been conceived and nurtured by violence, “Americans not only engage in violence, they are entertained by it” (Kozy). Keeping this fact in mind, the journalists should consider the fact that they might be contributing to our already “violent-society” in an unproductive manner (Sheffield). Various studies including one done by Browne and Giachritsis, entitled, the influence of violent media on children and adolescents, show that the media has a violent influence on children. The entertainment industry has the tendency to glamorize violence in an effective manner. Various games and movies advocate for violence. Live broadcast of violent issues is one of the platforms that most terrorist use to satisfy their desire for publicity (Browne and Giachritsis). This does not mean that the argument is against the first Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It’s an argument aimed at advocating for responsible journalism. There are better ways for lobbying for better gun control measures than the current continued coverage of violence in a bid to convince the public to adopt the laws. According to an article “The Power of Media Bias: Most Americans Wrongly Believe Gun Violence Has Increased” published on newsbusters.org by Geoffrey Dickens, it was revealed that the information regarding the increase in the gun violence is incorrect. The article gave references and statistics from researches (Pew Research Center Poll), which states that gun violence has dropped by half with comparison to the mid 90s. 56% of the people, who watch news, think otherwise suggesting that the media is propagating false information and manipulating its viewers (Dickens). This shows the manipulation of the public by media agencies. The research was initially highlighted in an article published in the L.A. Times. According to Emily Alper, "It's unclear whether media coverage is driving the misconception that such violence is up. The mass shootings in Newtown, Conn., and Aurora, Colo., were among the news stories most closely watched by Americans last year, Pew found" (Dickens). A recent MRC study, however, cleared the confusion and stated that there is nothing “unclear” and the influence of media on the public’s perspective is correct. The three major broadcasters namely ABC, CBS, and NBC were found guilty through this study. These news channels largely broadcasted programs with 216 panic segments on the issue of gun policy (Dickens). The article’s credibility was justified after the Bureau of Justice Statistics reported the exact number of death toll, which reported a positive decrease by 39 percent from 1993 to 2011 (Dickens). The statistics, which have been broadcasted to the masses, are completely incorrect and a wide disparity is observed, "Despite the remarkable drop in gun crime, only 12% of Americans surveyed said gun crime had declined compared with two decades ago, according to Pew, which surveyed more than 900 adults this spring. Twenty-six percent said it had stayed the same, and 56% thought it had increased" (Dickens). A similar kind of study, which was conducted by University of Maryland, illustrated how the media channels such as Fox News can convey false information regarding certain topics and can provide false information to their viewers through various news outlets and publications. The results as per the study concluded that as many as 90% of the participants who were also consumers of the media outlet said that they felt they had been provided with false information. According to an article published on huffingtonpost.com under the title Fox News Viewers are the Most Misinformed, the author Jack Mirkinson indicates that the viewers of Fox News were found to be the most misinformed viewers (Mirkinson). Another online article published on mediaite.com under the title Gun Control Debate Exposed The Media’s Bias, David Gregory Exposed Their Hypocrisy, the author talks about the media bias over the issue of gun control and how it has been providing viewers with wrong information (Rothman). The article clearly states unlike in the past when the anchors used to report what the news was without including their personal opinion with the element of “why” in it, today the media anchors deliberately comment and provide consumers with their perspective on the issue. This certainly creates an influence on the viewers who think that the channels are the correct source of information. This is the cause of the disparity which exists between the public (Rothman). Right after the death of the 26 children in Newtown, the news coverage regarding gun control increased. The public failed to understand the actual facts and the agenda of these media stations – which is just to make profits and nothing else. It is the media, who have been influencing the public in a negative manner regarding gun control (Dickens). The study conducted by Wayne State University on Media Influence on Attitudes toward Guns and Control published on the American Journal of Criminal Justice the author Kenneth Dowler revealed that larger media consumption resulted in the disagreements of gun control. The 1995 National Opinion Survey of Crime and Justice were implemented in this study to comprehensively analyze the adverse effects of media consumption. The media consumption can be either by watching televisions (hours per week); crime influenced dramas or programs, or by watching news as a primary source for crime reports (Dowler). The survey revealed that people who used to watch more television were the ones who were against gun control. According to these people disarmament can help decrease the crime rate in the country. Concealing firearms to diminish violence in the society is not the solution according to those who had their information from news channels. The author also suggested that the media is continuously depicting violence and crime through its programs and other means on television; which is greatly influencing the attitudes of the public in a negative manner regarding the issue of gun control (Dowler). The article further clarifying its headline said that the media intensely showed its interest in the issue for a brief time, before it found another issue to move on. This was because of the “attention-cycle”, is witnessed after any dramatic event, and is not confined to the gun control debate. In this case it was the Newtown Shooting. It is supported by the Lexis Nexus database that found as many as 3,635 news stories on economy during December and January. This was four times greater than what was witnessed during the gun control debate (Hayes, How media lose interest in gun control). It should be noted that the media has been very successful in molding the perceptions of the audience in any direction it wants. This is because of the obvious fact that viewers think that the information which is provided to them, includes certain facts, is correct forgetting that it may include cultural biasness, some business or political influence or any other socio-economic element. All though the media has suggested and propagated the message that gun violence increased. They have given the wrong facts in a bid to build a negative attitude against the position of guns. They have made people feel that through increased violence more people have died in shootings than earlier. Through this they have instilled fear and guilt among their viewers in a bid to ensure that gun control receives as much support as possible.
Solutions
The topic of gun control is a sensitive issue and many of the U.S. citizens are emotionally attached and thus blindly believe in whatever information is passed to them. It is very wrong and heartless to play with such strong feelings, intentionally or unintentionally. The media should ensure they adhere to their role to be as impartial as possible. Starting at the governmental level, it is the role of the government officials to check for the authenticity and the credibility of the information regarding the topic of gun control or any other news, which is provided to the public. The government should scrutinize the information, which is being provided by the media. This is because it also touches on the power or duty of the government and the authorities concerned with controlling its media. Responsible attitude is what the entire American nation deserves from top level management which is the government. It is understood that the media in the United States of America is free, but at the same time it is the duty of the media to stay within the boundaries and not to harm the interests of the public who believe in them. The media, which is also considered as the fourth pillar of any society according to Dr. Shah Shah in the book 2nd Revolution of our Founding Fathers Noble Vision, should understand its responsibilities (Shah). It should device ways in which it can diminish the negative elements such as that of gun violence from the society. If it continues to neglect its duties for fame and revenue or to get victory over its rivals, then this freedom should be put in check. Secondly, it is also the core responsibility of the public itself to understand and to judge what is right or wrong, rather than to blindly trust any source of information. The public should find secondary sources of information that confirm the credibility of the information broadcast through different channels or sources. This will help in coming up with a strong and positive perception towards gun control, without being misguided or adopting negative attitudes
Refutation of Opposing Argument Many people including the media itself argue and oppose the fact that it has influenced the public’s perspective or attitude towards gun control in a negative manner. They also claim that the media has not provided them with false information which has created misconceptions. It can undoubtedly be said that the media has highlighted the issue extensively. Jones in the article appearing on onenewssnow.com tiled Media overhelmingly promote gun control, suggested that every day, there was a number of news stories both electronic and print covering the issue of gun control right after the Newtown’s terrifying incident (Jones). The media just needs to feed the audience with whatever it has on the go as long as they make profits. The dishonesty of the media has already been witnessed and studied by different writers and reporters who have shown that the media has tried to play with the feelings of its audience just to increase its rating which is totally incongruous. With ambiguous stories the media has always tried to create a delusion in the public and take them off the track. If the media is getting increased ratings and handsome revenues and profits then it will not consider what is right or wrong. It will deliberately broadcast the content to its consumers who think of it as the only source of information. The news anchors and other public figures that are handsomely paid drive the attitude of the public. The role of media in this regard is strongly opposed and should be looked into.
Conclusion
Most Americans do not understand that media is a strong and influential element that can mold public perception. It has the power and potential to make the audience think and act in any manner it wants. Different stories, cases, and studies have shown different intervals or eras in which the public talked and acted in the same manner, as the media directs. The media is so powerful, in this regard, that the audience acts like its puppets. The media without understanding the sensitivity of the topic has broadcasted programs and campaigns which might have increased the problem according to many writers and thinkers; as the evil forces / terrorists desperately craves media attention. Secondly, different studies have shown that media has conveyed and passed false information to the public regarding gun control. This has led to serious misconceptions in understanding the topic; thus making the audience confused and unable to come up with the right decision. Finally, the media has also led to the increase in individuals who disagree with gun control and think that guns and arms should not be concealed. These are all the pointers that indicate that the media is wrongly directing and leading the public towards varied perspectives. It is very important to understand the sensitivity of the issue of gun control. The perception of the audience play a key role in the major decisions. It is the duty of the US government, media itself and the public to review and come up with actions regarding this issue.

Works Cited

Browne, Kevin D. and Catherine H. Giachritsis. “the influence of violent media on children and adolescents:a public health approach.” Lancet 365 (2005): 702-710.
Carter, Gregg Lee. Gun Control in the United States: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara : ABC-CLIO, 2006.
Dickens, Geoffrey. “The Power of Media Bias: Most Americans Wrongly Believe Gun Violence Has Increased.” 2013 8-May. newsbusters.org. 2013 8-November.
Dowler, Kenneth. “Media influence on attitudes toward guns and gun control.” American Journal of Criminial Justice 26.2 (2002): 235-247.
Hayes, Danny. “Why this gun control debate has been different.” 2013 28-January. washingtonpost.com. 2013 7-November.
—. “How media lose interest in gun control.” 2013 11-Janaury. edition.cnn.com. 2013 9-Novemeber.
Jones, Russ. “Media overwhelmingly promotes gun control.” 2013 12-February. onenewsnow.com. 2013 8-November.
—. “Media overwhelmingly promotes gun control.” 2013 12-February. onenewsnow.com. 2013 9-November.
Kozy, John. “Violence: The American Way of Life.” 2013 12-January. globalresearch.ca. 2013 8-November.
Mirkinson, Jack. “Fox News Viewers Are The Most Misinformed: Study.” 2010 17-December. huffingtonpost.com. 2013 8-November.
Morrissey, Edward. “Gun control? We need media rumor control.” 2013 18-September. theweek.com. 2013 9-November.
Shah, Shah Dr. 2nd Revolution of Our Founding Fathers' Noble Vision: Reconstruct Mature ... Bllomigton: AuthorHouse, 2008.
Sheffield, Matthew. “Gun Control? How About Media Control?” 2012 18-December. newsbusters.org. 2013 8-November.
Rothman, Noah. “Gun Control Debate Exposed The Media’s Bias, David Gregory Exposed Their Hypocrisy.” 2012 27th-December. mediaite.com. 2013 8-November.

Images of the Sources:
Shah, Shah Dr. 2nd Revolution of Our Founding Fathers' Noble Vision: Reconstruct Mature ... Bllomigton: AuthorHouse, 2008. Print
[pic]
Browne, Kevin D. and Catherine H. Giachritsis. "the influence of violent media on children and adolescents:a public health approach." Lancet 365 (2005): 702-710. Online.
[pic]

Hayes, Danny. "Why this gun control debate has been different." 28 January 2013. washingtonpost.com. Online. 7 November 2013.
[pic]
Hayes, Danny. "How media lose interest in gun control." 11 Janaury 2013. edition.cnn.com. Online. 9 Novemeber 2013.
[pic]

Kozy, John. "Violence: The American Way of Life." 12 January 2013. globalresearch.ca. Online. 8 November 2013.
[pic]
Rothman, Noah. "Gun Control Debate Exposed The Media’s Bias, David Gregory Exposed Their Hypocrisy." 27th December 2012. mediaite.com. Online. 8 November 2013.
[pic]

Sheffield, Matthew. "Gun Control? How About Media Control?" 18 December 2012. newsbusters.org. Online. 8 November 2013.
[pic]
Carter, Gregg Lee. Gun Control in the United States: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara : ABC-CLIO, 2006. Print.
[pic]

Dickens, Geoffrey. "The Power of Media Bias: Most Americans Wrongly Believe Gun Violence Has Increased." 8 May 2013. newsbusters.org. Online. 8 November 2013.
[pic]
Mirkinson, Jack. "Fox News Viewers Are The Most Misinformed: Study." 17 December 2010. huffingtonpost.com. Online. 8 November 2013.
[pic]
Morrissey, Edward. "Gun control? We need media rumor control." 18 September 2013. theweek.com. Online. 9 November 2013.
[pic]
Dowler, Kenneth. "Media influence on attitudes toward guns and gun control." American Journal of Criminial Justice 26.2 (2002): 235-247. Online.
[pic]

Jones, Russ. "Media overwhelmingly promotes gun control." 12 February 2013. onenewsnow.com. Online. 8 November 2013.
[pic]…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun control has been a hot topic for very long time. People on the anti-gun control side believe that gun ownership is a Constitutional right backed by the Second Amendment. The anti-gun believes that you should be able to possess and own any firearm. They also believe that gun laws only restrict the law abiding citizens. Pro-gun control believes that guns are the backbone to our crime problem. They also believe that gun laws help keep guns of the street and deter crime. The Second Amendment reads, a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Underlying this amendment are two goals of an individual and collective defense from violence and aggression, which have been recognized by Congress. The second amendment should help secure right of the people to have a gun in their home. The government should not be permitted to declare who would or would not be able to bear arms on the basis of vague religious tests or any other nebulous standard or artifice.(Adams, 1996) The first infringement on the Second Amendment came on November 30, 1993 when President Clinton signed Brady Bill I. The law required that there be a five day waiting period on all hand gun purchases. The Brady Bill also banned semi-automatic rifles and other military type weapons. The five day waiting period is supposed to stop felons from buying guns. But, Waiting periods do not stop felons from getting guns.......

Words: 1131 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...December 7, 2012 Gun Control Obviously, guns have been a very big part of our history but because it was use inappropriately gun control was created. Guns are weapons that can take a life in an instant (“Does Gun Control…”). Guns have been part of American society since the arrival of the first European settlers (“Topic Overview…”). Arms in this country are part of our history, part of our culture. It has been passed down, generations to generations, as just an important part of who we are (“Topic Overview…”). Prior to the civil war, gun control laws were enacted in the slaves states principally due to the fear of firearms in the hands of free blacks and slaves who might rebel against their masters (“Special Interview…”). In the 1960’s after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, and Senator Robert F. Kennedy, gun control became a major subject of safety. Certain individuals cannot handle firearm safely, and some individuals choose to use firearms inappropriately. Our society has passed laws regulating the ownership and use of firearms, and more legislation is being considered (“Special Interview…”). Throughout history violence has plagued the human race. We have passed laws to protect society, but the violence continues. Laws attempt to change human behavior, but laws are not able to change human nature. Laws are not enough to protect people from aggression. Xiong 2 While gun control advocates contend that guns leads to crime, injury,......

Words: 1676 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Texas and Washington State COM/220 March 31, 2010 Gun Control Texas and Washington State Many people do not know that 67% of all homicides in Texas were caused by firearms and 56% in Washington State? This is why, not only in these two states but the entire country, has debated countless years over the controversial issues of gun control and the laws. In the comparison and contrast in gun control stances in Texas and Washington State, the attitudes are very similar. It will discuss and cover many views and will teach about each states laws, statistics and stance on the gun control issue. These issues will be viewed side by side in comparison and contrast with each other to see all the facts. This way you will be able to decide your stance for yourself in the infamous controversial gun control issue. Washington State’s stance on gun control is in support of the gun owner and carrier and allows the owners to have numerous freedoms in owning and carrying guns. The stance against gun control is about 70% and lots of gun owners would like to keep the freedoms they already have. As RCW 9.41.050 states “Except in the person's place of abode or fixed place of business, a person shall not carry a pistol concealed on his or her person without a license to carry a concealed pistol” (Washington State Legislator, 2010). What this means to not just legal gun owners, but to anyone who possess a firearm, is that they are able to legally open carry......

Words: 2304 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Gun Control

...We Need Tougher Gun Control Laws? One of the most controversial issues in our society today is the topic of private gun ownership and gun control laws. This controversy has arisen mostly due to the different ways that the second constitutional amendment is interpreted. The amendment states that "a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Lott, 2000). On one side of the issue, there are those that believe that the amendment guarantees the right of individuals to possess and carry a wide variety of firearms. On the other side are those that contend that the amendment was only meant to guarantee to States the right to operate militias. One thing that both sides agree upon is that it is up to the Supreme Court to resolve this debate, as it is their responsibility to enforce the U.S. Constitution. Meanwhile, strict gun control laws have been created for the safety of the public. Gun control laws serve their purpose well, and through things such as criminal background checks, training, and permits, they promote responsible gun ownership. Tougher gun control laws are not necessary and would not lead to any intended benefits in society because they only attempt to solve problems that are not being created by the lack thereof. First of all, the assumption that tougher gun control laws will lead to a decrease in crime is just not true. Most criminals that use guns violently are......

Words: 343 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Gun Laws and Gun Control

...The debate on whether or not citizens of the United States should legally possess a gun has been an issue present all throughout history. With the ongoing violence and crime involving guns, may people, including political figures, believe stricter laws on guns will lower the rate of gun related violence. But who should be the one to determine these laws? Who is to say these laws and bans would even work? Each state has their own individual law when it comes to owning a gun. Should each state continue to have their laws, or should the government set a national law regarding the ownership of guns? If these said laws were to take effect, would those committing these acts of gun crime obey, or continue to wreak havoc? Which raises another important question; instead of the laws on guns themselves being more firm, what about the sentencing to those who use the weapon in order to harm other citizens? Would a harsher sentencing for gun crimes lower their rate, or simply be another consequence these criminals just deal with? Gun related violence is a rising issue in America. Putting a ban, or even limitations, on guns owned my citizens would do more harm than good. Many anti-gun groups, like the ones in Connecticut, have succeeded in passing a law that will reduce the amount of ammunition held inside a gun’s magazine. Since the passing of this law, the debate on whether it will bring positive or negative repercussions has been at a constant. The law came into play due to the...

Words: 1004 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Argumentative Essay against Gun Control Argumentative Essay against Gun Control Since 1980, forty-four states have passed laws allowing gun owners to carry concealed weapons outside their homes for personal protection. (Five additional states had these laws before 1980. Illinois is the sole holdout.) A federal ban on the possession, transfer, or manufacture of semiautomatic assault weapons, passed in 1994, was allowed to expire in 2004. In 2005, Florida passed the Stand Your Ground law, an extension of the so-called castle doctrine, exonerating from prosecution citizens who use deadly force when confronted by an assailant, even if they could have retreated safely; Stand Your Ground laws expand that protection outside the home to any place that an individual “has a right to be.” Twenty-four states have passed similar laws. Guns, therefore, are necessary in today's society for our protection There is no point to implement gun control considering the reality that criminals will still find a way to procure guns if they want to do so. Criminals will always make sure to have access to the guns that they need to execute their crimes successfully. They usually have connections to other influential people that can provide them with the guns and weapons that they need in order to execute their crimes. The bottom line is that if the criminals want to have access to guns, they will be able to get them even if there is a gun control policy in place. This law will not......

Words: 797 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Political Science 1333 Dr. Garrison December 3rd, 2009 The Gun Control Debate Gun control and the supposed right to a gun have been at the war for many decades. The term gun control refers to policies which seek to regulate the manufacture, sale, ownership, and the use of guns. These policies or the lack there of, are reinforced and intensified ever so often when an unfortunate tragedy occurs. For instance, after the April 16th, 2007 massacre at Virginia Tech University, in which left thirty-three persons including the gunman died, many persons were of the opinion that such an incident could have been avoided through effective gun control measures. However, the issue of gun control is a very sensitive topic in the American society. Many Americans view control gun legislation and policies as an attempt to refute and violate a constitutionally enshrined liberty, which guarantees them a right to own a gun. This liberty to own and possess firearms stems from the Second Amendment which many believe affords the ordinary citizen the right to be armed. On the contrary, there is the other sector of American society who argues that the Second Amendment does not afford or protect and such a right. Moreover, members of this group also argue that if the Constitution does in fact afford such a right it needs to be revisited or repealed since it is not applicable to the present American society. Both sides of the spectrum are heavily......

Words: 4741 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Stricter Gun Laws 2 Do you know how many firearms are owned by civilians in the United States? Roughly 300 million. Stricter gun control laws would allow fewer firearms on the streets. New laws are redundant, and make it harder to obtain firearms. It is our constitutional right to own firearms. My research will prove the primary right for citizens, to bare arms. Gun control laws should respect the nature that they were written in the U.S. constitution. Is a known fact that the harder you make something to get, the less there will be of what you're trying to obtain. There are many states and cities with very strict gun control laws. The city of Chicago has some of the most restrictive gun control laws in the nation. Up until a few months ago it was illegal for citizens to own or possess a firearm anywhere in the city. According to the officer down memorial page, the city of Chicago had five police officers killed in the line of duty this year. Four of those were killed by gunfire. Yes, stricter gun control laws would prevent more guns in the hands of citizens or criminals but as we see in Chicago and many other states in cities, stricter gun control laws only help the criminals, and make the crime rate skyrocket. New laws that are trying to be passed are redundant and make it harder to obtain firearms. As a gun owner myself, I think the laws are tough enough as they Stricter Gun Laws 3 stand. Currently before licensed firearms dealer sell a......

Words: 666 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Four cherished American values are: Self-Reliance, protection, security, and control. People look at gun control from many different perspectives and it’s obviously a controversial topic. I look at it from a psychological and sociological stand point. I believe that too many people look at guns as either increasing crime rate or reducing it and while I understand that as being an important topic, I’m more interested in why people feel the need to carry and what that does to a community of people. I believe that carrying a gun is understandable, but being allowed to carry one should be made more difficult. People rely too much on a piece of metal to save them, thus defeating the purpose of carrying it for self-reliance. This brings me into my first topic; self-reliance. In 1968, President Johnson signed the Gun Control Act and then later in 1998, President Clinton used his executive authority to ban more than 50 types of assault weapons. As you can imagine, the gun wielding people of America weren’t the happiest of people about it. I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase, “Guns don’t kill people; people kill people.” I actually agree with that statement. People don’t take into account that not everyone in the world is a gun aficionado. Let’s say someone breaks into your house, you run and go grab your gun, and then run into the living room to see the burglar with your new flat screen television that you probably got at black Friday and stood in line for, for 8+ hours.......

Words: 1722 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Gun control is one of the controversial issues in the United States of America, especially after the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King. In some parts of America living with a gun is not only a right but also a culture. But for many others it is a threat and a source of insecurity. I am part of the latter and hope to see gun free America. In real world there ups and downs, there are moments of pleasure as well as discomfort. This is fact of life. Crimes are committed not only by criminals but by anyone who couldn’t restrain his anger during interaction in day to day life. At this moment it is not the same to be with a gun and without. As a human being there are moments when things are beyond our control and forced us to take serious measures against others. During this moment if a person is unable to restrain his emotion, carrying a gun will push him to commit a crime which he has never been intended. Bearing gun is a right as it is written in the Second Amendment of United States constitution; however, how this can be reconciled if it is a threat to the majority of Americans is a legitimate question. Guns exact a huge toll on America's children and youth, both in terms of lives lost and in terms of quality of life. Study shows that for black families, the chance of their male children dying from a gunshot wound is 62% higher than the chance of dying in a motor vehicle crash. For Hispanics, the chance of dying by...

Words: 774 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Gun Control

...The Deadly Date The Deadly Debate Gun Control has been at the forefront of many debates due to the increase of deadly shootings. Over the past several years, there have been multiple mass casualty shootings, and as the number of shootings increased, United States citizens began the debate of whether tighter gun control laws would prevent these shootings. In this debate, we will address the reasons supporting gun control and the reasons opposing gun control. Americans have a choice and this choice will be debated below. America was founded on the principle of freedom and the rights of an individual to live in a nation built by the people, for the people. The government has begun to use tragedy, terrorism and civil unrest to force unjustified laws and federal controls into action that are a direct attack on our civil liberties. The NSA and other federal organizations have violated Americans rights and freedom in the name of national security far too many times. If we allow the government to take away our rights to bear arms it will be another tragedy in the long list of attacks on our American rights. Many gun control activists believe that reducing the number of private gun owners in America will reduce crime and suicide. This could not be further from the truth; strict gun laws will only take the guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens, criminals will be armed and normal citizens will have no means of immediate protection. A recent study conducted by......

Words: 1987 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Over the past few years gun control has become a major issue for politicians as a result of increased shootings. Some people argue that the increase in violent shootings should be a cause to promote greater gun control. Whereas others will say that if there were fewer restrictions on guns then violent shootings would occur less often. Because of each there is no clear solution it is a touchy issue among politicians and very few laws are passed with regards to either argument. The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (Wikipedia). This amendment has been the largest reason why there is not stricter gun control because no politician will do anything that comes remotely close to going against the Constitution. Both state and federal courts have used two models to interpret the Second Amendment: the "individual rights" model, which holds that individuals hold the right to bear arms, and the "collective rights" model, which holds that the right depends on militia membership. The collective rights model has been discarded by the U.S. Supreme Court, in favor of the individual rights model. The primary U.S. Supreme Court Second Amendment cases include District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), and McDonald v. Chicago(2010). In Heller and McDonald the U.S. Supreme Court supported the individual rights model, under which the Second......

Words: 1428 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control “Gun control” is a phrase that means different things to different people. It has been a serious topic of debate that this author now intends to prove as being right or wrong. For all the attention that gun control has received, there are two basic opinions that are to be discussed. To its proponents, gun control means prevention of crime. This, they say, should lead to peace. Charles Krauthammer wrote about this in “The Washington Post” in an article titled “Disarm The People.” He wrote, “…a civilized society must disarm its citizenry if it is to have a modicum of domestic tranquility…” Pro-gun activists, on the other hand, see gun-control as a threat not only to their self-defense, but also to their Second Amendment right. In an issue of American Survival Guide, Howard J. Fezell wrote an essay: “Your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” during which he made plain this fact: gun-prohibitionists have completely ignored numerous rulings of the Supreme Court in which the Supreme Court has stated the Second Amendment as an individual right, not a collective right. Also, they believe it to be a failed experiment. This is obvious in a statement by David Lampo: “The basic premise of the gun control movement, that easy access to guns causes higher crime, is contradicted by the facts, by history and by reason.” According to statistics, gun bans - the ultimate goal of gun control activists - has failed completely. The right to......

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control is when you keep firearms plus guns away from people. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Also when ever people hear the word gun, the thoughts are of violence and negativity. Many people, myself included think gun control is wrong because we know that it is not necessary, since we know that guns were not involved in many of the deaths caused each year. While many other people disagree and think it is good because of the safety for people. In this essay I will tell you why gun control is unnecessary and why there shouldn?t be any gun control at all. There have been many gun control laws established throughout the U.S., but they vary from state to state. For example, in Colorado you can purchase any type of gun: handgun, machine gun, shotgun, rifle, automatic rifle, etc. at the age of 18, while in other places you would need a hunting license.1 I think this is unfair because when I?m at the age of 18 I would want to buy a gun, but I can?t because I?m living in California and another 18 year old could in Colorado. Also, another example is that in some states, they allow citizens to carry concealed weapons, while in other states citizens can?t. I don?t think this is fair at all because I think they should make laws that suits the whole U.S., and not make different laws in......

Words: 1322 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control in the U.S. It is not difficult to find news concerning gun incidents, where many innocent people are killed or injured by firearms in the U.S. Some people think that the solution to the gun problem, during which many innocent people are killed or hurt, is simply making laws concerning gun control. However, they would never think that gun control is a simple problem to solve, if they knew about this issue concerning the basic right to protect oneself according to the Second Amendment in the U.S. There are always fierce debates about gun control between supporters and opponents of regulation of firearms. As a result, the key of debates can be summarized into two subjects; ‘personal right to have guns for protecting oneself’, and ‘government’s right to control gun possession for protecting our society from violent crimes’. Supporters of gun control argue that there have been many crimes and murders by firearms and if we make a strong gun control law, the crime rate will be lowered and we can save many innocent lives including young students. On the other hand, opponents argue that they need to carry firearms because gun possession is the basic right to protect themselves from violent crimes according to the Second Amendment. They claim that if there are strong gun control laws, many innocent people will suffer from brutal crimes because they can’t possess firearms. Although some people believe that being able to carry a gun is one of the basic rights......

Words: 2372 - Pages: 10