Premium Essay

Federal vs State Policy

In: Other Topics

Submitted By divamami619
Words 1047
Pages 5
Federal vs. State Policy Comparison

Yadira Garcia Rodriguez

Federal vs. States Policy Comparison

In this assignment, I will be comparing and contrasting the differences and similarities of the federal and state government as it pertains to their role in the implementation of criminal justice policy, also I will address all aspects of policy development and implementation. A public policy is the body of principles that underpin the operation of legal systems in each state, also I will discuss each of the policies and how they are similar and how they are different. Federal and State policies are made to help keep our Country running smoothly. If there were no policies then keeping our Country safe would be a hard task. Policies are principles that are set to help make our Country operate on a daily bases. I like to think of it as rules that are set to keep our Country safe, because if there were no rules then everyone would be doing their own thing which could cause for a much disorganized situation and a chaos society. What is the definition of federal government? (A government with strong central powers According to "The Free Dictionary” (2012).When it comes to the federal government, their powers also control and pay the debt within this country. They also are the ones that created the rules and walls for immigration. They establish the punishment for those who create counterfeiting crimes. They also provide the fix in the standard of weights and measures. (The federal government is the power of the military by supporting, regulating, and raising the correct troops)," Legal Basis of the National Guard ", 2009). They also employ and provide the Postal service. The money in coins along with their value and issuing bills of credit and foreign coin is also a power that the federal government has. The federal…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Federal Versus State Policy Comparison

...Federal versus State Policy Comparison Johnny Mc Loud-Hoover CJA 463 Federal versus State Policy Comparison The Federal government does not play as big of a role in decisions as the state government does, but they are just as important in the criminal of justice system. This is because the state courts tend to do the most sentencing while the Federal courts are used to deal with Federal cases. However, the Federal can oversee the State and even change or set rules in which the state must go by in future cases. The government’s role is to be as supportive such as in providing funding to the states to aid in activities pertaining to the criminal justice process and which warrant national attention (federalism, 2008). This has led to some noted differences in the criminal justice policy between the federal as well as the state governments. This paper therefore seeks to analyze the apparent similarities and differences in the development and implementation of the criminal justice policy within these governments. DEVELOPMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY Generally, the federal government has a significant role in the formulation of various policies within the states but such these policies are never a requirement for the individual states. The policies centering on criminal justice are considered to be a local matter and are largely determined by individual states. Thus the formulation of criminal and other policies at the state level will depend on...

Words: 1141 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

State and Federal Prison Systems

...State and Federal Prison Systems Leslie Cable 4/12/2013 CJS/230 Larry Doyle State prisons hold people who are arrested by local police and sheriff departments. Federal prisons hold people who are arrested by the federal bureau of investigations (FBI). The state and federal prisons have security levels for every type of prisoners. State prisons are run by the department of corrections while the federal prisons are run by the justice department. “The Federal Bureau of Prisons was created by an act of Congress and signed into law by President Herbert Hoover on May 14, 1930,” (Foster, 2006, Pg. 134). State prisons have more inmates than they do staff while federal prisons have more staff than they do prisoners. An example of a state prison is San Quentin state prison in California. San Quentin was opened in the 1850s and housed both men and women prisoners. In 1933, the women’s prison at Tehachapi was built. Tehachapi was shut down after an earthquake hit it in July 1952 then it was reopened as a men’s prison three years later. “Despite periodic schemes to shut it down – “the prison that would not die” – San Quentin held nearly 6,000 inmates in 2003,” (Foster, 2006, Pg. 127). The only way I could explain the growth of state prisons is that more people are arrested for crimes than ever before. People are committing more crimes than he is or she is used to and then are sentenced to prison time. More people are arrested for drug......

Words: 714 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Federal Powers vs State

...American Government FEDERAL POWERS VS STATE POWERS Based on what I have gathered in the lectures Federal Powers are based on more of a national agreement as a whole with declaring what national laws that needs to be made. For instance declaring war as well as raising and maintaining the army and navy. Federal Powers also made laws to enforce the Constitution, and implying powers based on the elastic clause powers that were considered “necessary and proper” for carrying out the enumerated (or express) powers. Based on my research with what I learn through the lecture and web browsing and example of the elastic clause was back in 1791, Federalists in Congress argued that the creation of a national bank was “necessary and proper” for Congress to execute its enumerated powers to coin and borrow money and regulate currency. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) confirmed Congress’s right to found this national bank. Then we have our three branches that help divide federal powers responsibilities which are the executive branch were the president implements the laws, the legislative branch were the Congress makes the laws, and the judiciary branch where the court system interprets the laws and decided legal controversies. Whereas, the State Powers Exercise powers neither delegated to the national government nor prohibited from the states by the U.S. The lecture used example like being able set legal drinking and smoking ages. State Powers also focused on establishing local......

Words: 450 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

History of State and Federal Prisons

...History of State and Federal Prisons Joshlyn Aday CJS/230 John Feltgen November 14, 2013 Since the beginning of the criminal justice system, when the English brought over the concept that is the foundation for our criminal justice system today, there has been a sought out concept: There must be a reason for punishing criminals other than simple vengeance. This usually happens within the criminal justice system, but not often do people have to pay for the crimes that they’ve done.  As a result, the first penitentiaries, predecessors of prisons today, were built with a view to behavior modification procedures (Foster, 2006). Today we have these institutions called state and federal prisons. They’ve had their number of changes throughout the years for modification. Just as any one thing throughout the world, they have their differences as well as their similarities. Looking to the past, we can pinpoint some sort of starting line for the development of what we call the prison system. In Norfolk, England circa 1875, nearing the end of the Age of Enlightenment, Sir Thomas Beever announced the grand opening of Wymondham Gaol. Towards the end of the Enlightenment, the Western civilization, looking inward, believed it was more civilized and reformations began to touch every aspect of life, including dealings with criminals. Belief in the scientific method drove society to find more humane ways of dealing with the lawless while perhaps transforming these into law-abiding,......

Words: 679 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Local State Federal Matrix

...University of Phoenix Material Government Comparisons Matrix Based on the readings from State and Local Government, review and summarize how each issue is managed at the state and local levels. Write 50 to 70 words for each response. |State |Local |Federal |How these entities | | | | |cooperate | |General |When it comes to general |Obviously, the local form|The federal government |These entities cooperate in| |Responsibilities |responsibilities, there |of government has an |has control over both the|that they set plans and | | |is not much difference |utmost responsibility to |state and local |itineraries for how they | | |between these forms of |the citizens. All money |governments when it comes|will attack the general | | |government, except the |that is spent is used for|to general |responsibilities within | | |size of the area that is |the best interest of all |responsibilities. When |each state and in the | | |covered. The state |citizens. Being local, |state or local government|United States as a whole. | | |government is responsible|it is the smallest form |are committing an act |They......

Words: 1028 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

State vs. Federal Regulations Paper

...Running head: STATE VS. FEDERAL REGULATIONS PAPER State vs. Federal Regulations Paper XXXXXXXX University of Phoenix XXXXXXX MGT/434 State vs. Federal Regulations Paper Employees are protected by many federal and state laws that regulate what an employer cannot and can do. Therefore, figuring out which employment laws apply to the workforce can present a challenge because they can come from federal and state sources. The laws that are applicable to each workforce sector for employee protections depends on many factors; the number of employees, the type of business it conducts, and if it crosses state boundaries. The purpose of this paper is to examine how federal and state governments differ in their application of employments laws and will discuss an employment protection provided exclusively by a state government. State vs. Federal Wage, hour and employment laws governing employers and employees are set at the state level and the federal level. Often measurable differences between federal laws and state laws exist depending on the state the company is operating in. When this occurs, companies are supposed to comply and govern their policies to follow the laws that offer the best protection to the employee. On the federal level the agency over employment law is The US Department of Labor (DOL) this agency administers federal employment laws. In most states employment laws are administered by the states labor division. With many agencies......

Words: 1942 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

State vs Federal

...| Federal Vs State Policy Comparison | | | CJA 464 | Robert Powers | | Each state has their own specific unique laws established individually for their state. In conjunction with those laws that exist over the people in their specific state there are also federal laws that govern the states as well as the people who live in them. These laws that govern the people are known as state laws and federal laws. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land in the United States. “It creates a federal system of government in which power is shared between the federal government and the state governments. Due to federalism, both the federal government and each of the state governments have their own court systems (Comparing State & Federal Courts, 2013)”. The Constitution provides the federal government the authority it needs to handle the nations international affairs as they deal with foreign policy, this enables the federal government to create and establish the national defense needs of the nation, and it also allows them the power to handle and deal with the issues which are currency related inside the nation. The federal government is superior to state government, and, because of this federal law will override state law. The Fourteenth Amendment in the United States Constitution designates that the Bill of Rights valid in each state. According to the Constitution federal law is designated to govern items passed in legislation by the United States......

Words: 1043 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Federal Highway Policy

...Federal Highway Policy Leilani Wolford POL 201 Amy Lyons 01/19/2015 Federal Highway Policy Age—it is nothing but a number—as many people say. With age comes wisdom, and with wisdom, wise decisions are made. Maintaining the minimum legal drinking age at 21 will deter life-long consequences, decrease traffic fatalities in result of alcohol consumption, and relieve issues in relation to public safety. In 1984, the National Minimum Drinking Age Act mandated that all states increase the minimum age purchase and consumption to 21. Under the Federal Highway Aid act, also referred to as the National Interstate of Defense Highways Act which was established in 1956, states that do not adhere to this requirement faced a highway-fund cutback consequence. Underage drinking, which affects many adolescent-and-young-adult households, is a problem and a significant public health concerns. It is correlated with an abundant array of damaging consequences (Spoth, Greenberg, & Turrisi, 2009, pg. 1, para. 1). Over the past several decades or so, the Minimum Legal Drinking Age (MLDA) has raised debate in the United States. The influence to decrease the MLDA from 21 to 18, 19, or 20 came from a decrease in the legal voting age to 18. A total of 29 states lowered their MLDA between the years of 1970 to 1975. Because of this poorly thought through revision, traffic collision due to alcohol consumption have dramatically increased in adults between the ages of 18-20. With such dramatic......

Words: 640 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Canadian Healthy Policy vs. United States Health Policy

...Canadian Healthy Policy vs. United States Health Policy AHS 330 Health Care Systems: 7Q April 2, 2014 Healthcare in the United States is extremely different from the rest of the world. Over the years government and political analysts have compared and contrasted the health care systems of the United States to that of Canada’s. Despite being located on the same continent both countries have different ways of delivering health care to its citizens. Canada has a single-payer system that is publicly funded, while the United States has a multi-payer system that relies heavily on privately owned healthcare. This could be due to the differences in how many patients are cared for compared to those in America or it could be just a matter of who developed the better healthcare. However, due to the close proximity of the countries it is possible that the United States can adopt the Canadian healthcare system. According to Health Canada, Canada's publicly funded health care system is best described as an interlocking set of ten provincial and three territorial health insurance plans. Known to Canadians as "Medicare", the system provides access to universal, coverage for hospital and physician services. With this being said it is safe to assume that health care services are provided on the basis of need, rather than the ability to pay. “The Canadian Health Act contains a single national plan that is composed of thirteen provincial and territorial health insurance plans that all......

Words: 1987 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Soc 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal

...331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal http://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal http://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal http://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal http://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal http://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal http://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal http://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal http://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal http://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week......

Words: 1008 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

State and Federal Prison

...Jail and Prison Paper Tameki Reed CJA/204 05/31/11 Robert White Jail and Prison Paper When it comes to jail and prison, there is a distinctive set of differences. Jail is a place of incarceration that is locally operated, while prisons are conducted by the state government or the federal government. Within the United States, there are about 3,600 jails but there are only about 100 federal prisons or rehabilitation facilities. Jails house inmates who have been convicted of a misdemeanors and their sentence is no greater than two years. In addition, a person may be held in jail while awaiting trial, has an unpaid bond, or was recently jailed. If a person is convicted of a state crime he or she will serve their sentence in a state prison as opposed to federal crimes which lands offenders in federal prisons. A jail’s amenities are very limited because of the light sentence and short periods of time spent there. A county jail offers work release, substance abuse programs, and may provide basic necessities to inmates. Prisons also offer work release programs, vocational training, halfway houses, as well as recreational facilities. Inmates at prisons will serve decades within the facility while others have to serve lifetime sentences behind bars. A major concern of prison staff and administrators is disruptive and violent behavior. Their concerns pertain to the safety of inmates as well as employees of the prison facility. Disruptive and violent behavior is not tolerated......

Words: 884 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

History of State and Federal Prison

...History of state and federal prisons The histories of the state and federal prison systems have some connections which both systems has something distinctive. The State is usually operated by the state governments and consists of prisoners that are considered blue collar criminals and the federal systems are mainly associated with white collar criminals. Both prison systems have security levels which include minimum, low, medium, and high levels of security. History of punishment dates back to the origin of various civilizations. The former colonial criminal edicts were a inquisitive blend of English barbarity, religion, and pragmatism. Ever since the beginning of the world people have devised ways to punish individuals who commit offensive and intolerable acts. The idea of prisons however came later and the use of jails and detention methods was seen as more humanitarian process when compared to formal corporal methods to punish an offensive individual. In 1700 century the former philosophy of prison was presented and was accepted widely. In 1790 first ever prison was constructed in United States named as Walnut Street Jail. As the time went by the framework and processes of prison systems were devised and by 1930 The Federal Bureau of Prison was developed by congress that was headed by President Herbert Hoover .The original impartial United States prison was an old army penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas and started accommodating offenders in 1895......

Words: 378 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

History of State and Federal Prisons

...History of State and Federal Prisons The history of state prisons start with the concept on which the institution was based upon, the penitentiary. The penitentiary was based on the eighteenth-century legal reforms where scholars searched for a more humane and reform-oriented alternative to death and other physical punishments that seemed inhumane, according to our textbook. (Foster, 2006) In the late 1700’s, principles of isolation, work, and humble attitudes were instilled upon inmates in order to change the nature of confinement. Some penitentiaries incorporated large open spaces with a glass-top ceiling for better lighting and to help cut costs of electricity. This also helped officers to supervise inmates. The early 1900’s and the Great Depression brought forth agricultural prisons, which included gigantic plantations and farms where inmates could work. This idea developed into inmates working in other areas, such as public roads, clearing forests, and other public projects where inmates earned the name of slaves. Maximum security was the norm for the early penitentiaries, which included high walls, guard towers, cell blocks stacked in tiers, and massive concrete and steel construction. Prisoners were controlled with isolation and high levels of intimidation. (Foster, 2006) Federal prisons began in 1930 however, before this date federal prisoners served their time in state and local institutions. There weren’t many federal crimes or federal criminals......

Words: 371 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

State and Federal Systems Paper

...State and Federal Prison Systems Paper CJS/230 State and Federal Prison Systems There are many different state and federal prisons. Some of these prisons are government owned and operated, and others are privately owned. Prisons are for criminals that are serving more than a year’s time. State prisons were created and based on the 18th century age of enlightenment designs. Over a million people are in diverse types of state level and government operated prison systems. Every state started with one prison which was based on the Auburn prison in New York (Foster, 2006). Each state can have from three to a hundred prisons depending on their necessity for them. In time because of overpopulation, and unique cases such as women and children being criminals there was a need to expand prisons, and to create a place for women and juveniles to go to serve their time. In state and federal prisons there are several various levels of security. Today’s prisons have security levels such as minimum security, medium security, maximum security, closed-high security, and open security. There are many prisons that are considered multi-level prisons and they consist of multiple security levels. State prisons can have anywhere from 10,000 to 150,000 inmates at any given time (Foster, 2006). I believe that one way state prisons can get overcapacity problems under control is to not keep people in there that are first time offenders or they have committed very small crimes. Most state prisons......

Words: 643 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Dueling Banjos State vs. Federal

...Banjos (State vs. Federal) The United States Judicial System Dee Montano CJA/204 April 3, 2012 Sherre D. Corniel The Dueling Banjos (State vs. Federal) The United States Judicial System Frustration, confusion, and complexity; these three words can and are used regularly to describe the justice system within the United States. A better understanding of the history, principles, and role of the dual court system is necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the American justice system. FEDERALISM vs. ANTI-FEDERALISM The roots of the modern court system in the United States can be found in the principle of federalism. When the delegates met in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention among other issues that needed to be addressed was a national judicial system; the Articles of Confederation was woefully inadequate in providing for this. The dual judicial system that exists today was given life with the passage of Article III of the U.S. Constitution ("[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.") Article III was a compromise between the Federalists, supporters of a strong central government, who thought that the federal judiciary should contain all of the courts (trial, appellate, and supreme). Whereas the Anti-Federalists, proponents of states’ rights, believed that an all-inclusive federal judiciary would minimize states’......

Words: 1654 - Pages: 7