Premium Essay

Ethical Employment

In: Business and Management

Submitted By hpagington
Words 434
Pages 2
Ethical Employment Issue
Heather Pagington
Webster University
Corporate Responsibility and Society
MGNT 5990
Greg Hoffmann
January 15, 2014

Ethical Employment Issue
Working for an ethical company or for a company that makes ethical decisions is important. One organization that I could not work for is Planned Parenthood. My stance on abortion is completely Pro-Life. My beliefs come from my faith and love for children. The below includes my reasons for my objections to Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood is the number one provider of abortions in the nation. Interestingly enough they promote themselves as, "America's most trusted provider of reproductive healthcare." Planned Parenthood does not like to talk about its abortion business, but it runs the nation's largest abortion chain and commits over 300,000 abortions a year (Tolck, 2013).

1. Abortion is murder. Planned Parenthood's schedule each day is a kill list (Hasson, 2013). After watching the movie The Silent Scream in high school, no one will be able to convince me that a zygote, embryo or fetus is not a human being. The baby tried to avoid the instrument that was inserted into the woman to extract him or her.
a) Planned Parenthood kills twice as many innocent human beings every week as died in the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001.
b) Planned Parenthood also has a goal of reducing the population. 2. Debate on when birth begins is ongoing.
a) Some say life begins at conception
b) Some say life begins at the first heartbeat
c) Some say life begins when the child feels pain (usually around 20 weeks)
d) Some say life begins at birth
3. Planned Parenthood will not save or try to save a baby that is born alive when the abortion is not successful. a) "we would not help it...we would not intubate...[or] do any extra procedures to help the person survive."…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Employment-at-Will; Making Ethical Decisions with Potential Legal Effects

...Running Head: EMPLOYMENT-AT-WILL; MAKING ETHICAL DECISIONS WITH POTENTIAL LEGAL EFFECTS Employment-at-will: Ethical Decisions with Potential Legal Effects Rosalyn S Hicks Leg 500 Law, Ethics and Corporate Governance Professor Augustine Weekly November 2nd, 2013 As the Chief Operating Officer, it is essential that the needs of the company be examined, strategies be devised and a plan to execute these strategies be developed. Managing day to day operations of the organization requires an open and honest relationship with the Chief Executive Officer. Staying on top of production quotas is just one area that the COO ventures into. Preparing for an Initial Public Offering, IPO, requires knowledge of personnel issues, identifying emerging markets and identifying operational risks and environmental sustainability. The first sale of stock to the public has to be backed by the assurance that the organization is growing in a positive direction so that the shareholders are confident in their investments. As the COO of a company trying to go public, recognizing that this move requires being regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is an important step in growing the company. Addressing internal issues is the first step in preparing for the first IPO. Personnel issues, such as an employee’s public dissatisfaction with some facet of the company operations could do the company great harm. How the COO handles employee concerns or behaviors will also give......

Words: 1357 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Employment at Will

...Employment at Will Doctrine Employment relationships are considered “at will” in all U.S. states except Montana. The U.S. is one of a handful of countries where employment is at-will. Most countries throughout the world allow employers to dismiss employees only for cause. Some believe the reasons the U.S. has kept the at-will policy are due to respect for freedom of contract, employer deference, and the belief that both employers and employees favor an at-will employment relationship over job security (Muhl, 2001). Charles Muhl stated that “at-will mean that an employer can change the terms of the employment relationship with no notice and no consequences.” An example would be an employer terminating benefits and cutting cost by not issuing raises. Due to the at-will doctrine, many employees are left vulnerable to arbitrary and sudden dismissal, a limited or on-call work schedule, which depends on the employer’s needs, and unannounced cuts in pay and benefits (Stone, 2007). In the next paragraphs I will evaluate eight scenarios and describe whether I can legally fire the employee and what action I should take to limit liability and impact on operations. Later on in the paper I will also explain my reasoning behind recommending that my company adopt a whistleblower policy. Scenario 1 John post a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized the company’s most important customer. When you first read this statement your first thought is, not so much a big......

Words: 1909 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Employment-at-Will

...Assignment 1: Employment-At-Will Doctrine LEG500 – Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance Employment-At-Will Employment at will was installed in United States labor law during the Industrial Revolution in the late 1800’s. Initially without modifications, employment at will meant that a worker who labored for an unspecified time labored at the wishes of the owner. However, lacking a clause in an agreement, either participant may possibly end the employment without a motive. At first sight, employment at will seemed to be an impartial policy that gave the owner and the worker a way out of an unwanted working relationship. Nevertheless, the policy actually worked to the advantage of the owner, the person who typically has the upper hand in the relationship (Zachary, 2012, p. 21). This does not insinuate that managers can randomly terminate workers with no good faith consultation, equality, and unbiased procedures. Managers have to express an honest attempt to rectify the worker’s performance or the additional problems that led to firing the employer. “Because we have at will employment” it shall not be exercised as grounds to terminate a worker (Heathfield, n.d.). As the manager, I must analyze the employment-at-will doctrine and determine what, if any, exceptions and liabilities exist before taking any action in regards to the following scenarios: 1. John posted a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized the company’s most important customer. John can......

Words: 1672 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Employment at Will

...Running head: Employment At Will Employment at Will: Relationship between Societal Expectations and the Law BSA535 Business Law January 2014 Abstract This paper analyzes the relationship between the survey conducted by the Department of Labor in New York and Syracuse areas and the existing law. The survey reviews the law regarding the dismissal of at-will employees for exposing or refusing to partake in criminal or immoral endeavors. Results of the survey were to ascertain societal expectations regarding at-will employment and the law’s content regarding the issue. Employment at Will: Relationship between Societal Expectations and the Law The employment-at-will law states that employment may be terminated by an employer, for any reason or at any time. Employers are allowed to dismiss their employees for good reasons, morally wrong reasons, or for no reason without being liable of a legal wrong. Termination from rejecting to take part in practices that are not illegal but which are believed by the employee to be unethical are less apt to be actionable. Both of these situations are addressed in terms of the so-called public policy exception to the employment at will rule. The cause of action, often labeled "wrongful discharge" or "retaliatory discharge," is typically tort-based, although a few states employ contract theory in this context. On the other hand, individuals who report illegal or unethical practices......

Words: 4731 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

Employment at Will

...Employment-at-will Doctrine Whistleblower Strategy Yasser Benadada Strayer University Professor Holeman Table of Contents Employment at will Doctrine 2 Public-policy exception 2 Implied-contract exception 3 Covenant-of-good-faith and Tort based exceptions 3 Evaluation each of the eight (8) scenarios: 4 Recommend whistleblower policy 7 Fundamental Items to Whistleblower policy 8 References 10 Employment at will Doctrine According to Clarkson, Miller, Jentz & Cross (2004, p.235), employment at will is a common law doctrine under which either party may terminate an employment relationship at any time for any reason, unless a contract specifies otherwise. Today this common law doctrine is widely used and applies in every state except Montana. However, state and federal statutes that govern employment relationships prevent the doctrine from being applied under certain circumstances. As such, employees who are wrongfully discharged may bring legal action against their employer based on violations of employment contract or statutory law. These state and federal statutes collectively are known as the exceptions to the employment at will doctrine that the courts adopted because of the harsh effects on employees. Public-policy exception According to Sentell & Robbins (2008), under the public-policy exception to employment at will, an employee is wrongfully discharged when the termination is against an explicit, well-established public policy......

Words: 2826 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Employment at Will

...Running head: Employment At Will Employment at Will: Relationship between Societal Expectations and the Law Stephanie K. Walker Averett University BSA535 Business Law January 2014 Abstract This paper analyzes the relationship between the survey conducted by the Department of Labor in New York and Syracuse areas and the existing law. The survey reviews the law regarding the dismissal of at-will employees for exposing or refusing to partake in criminal or immoral endeavors. Results of the survey were to ascertain societal expectations regarding at-will employment and the law’s content regarding the issue. Employment at Will: Relationship between Societal Expectations and the Law The employment-at-will law states that employment may be terminated by an employer, for any reason or at any time. Employers are allowed to dismiss their employees for good reasons, morally wrong reasons, or for no reason without being liable of a legal wrong. Termination from rejecting to take part in practices that are not illegal but which are believed by the employee to be unethical are less apt to be actionable. Both of these situations are addressed in terms of the so-called public policy exception to the employment at will rule. The cause of action, often labeled "wrongful discharge" or "retaliatory discharge," is typically tort-based, although a few states employ contract theory in this context. On the other hand,......

Words: 4737 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Employment-at-Will

...Employment-at-Will Doctrine Professor: May 1, 2014 Assignment # 1 Employment-at-Will Summary of the Employment-at-Will Doctrine The concept of At-will means that an employer can terminate an employee because of any reason but the illegal dismissals does not come under this category. Similarly, the employee will also have a choice to leave the job at any time with or without any reason. There would not be any adverse legal consequence in such a case. In some cases, the contents related to the Employment-at-Will can be included in the contract. For instance, the contract can provide a specific duration of employment or include reasons for termination. The discussion of these factors during the preparation for the At-Will Employment Contract usually takes place between the employers and employees. The courts also provides legal cover for such contracts that has a lot of importance (Charles, 2001). Therefore, these are all the major aspects related to the Summary of the Employment-at-Will. This doctrine is followed in the United States at large whereas other countries, which has provided a chance of ‘good faith’ includes Canada, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Italy and Sweden. At-will doctrine serves to provide the employer the liberty to terminate any employee with or without any good or bad cause. Nevertheless, the good cause commitments are stated to the employee at the time of recruitment so that they can have their job security issues resolved (Free Dictionary,...

Words: 1631 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Employment-at-Will

...Employment-at-Will Doctrine Professor: May 1, 2014 Assignment # 1 Employment-at-Will Summary of the Employment-at-Will Doctrine The concept of At-will means that an employer can terminate an employee because of any reason but the illegal dismissals does not come under this category. Similarly, the employee will also have a choice to leave the job at any time with or without any reason. There would not be any adverse legal consequence in such a case. In some cases, the contents related to the Employment-at-Will can be included in the contract. For instance, the contract can provide a specific duration of employment or include reasons for termination. The discussion of these factors during the preparation for the At-Will Employment Contract usually takes place between the employers and employees. The courts also provides legal cover for such contracts that has a lot of importance (Charles, 2001). Therefore, these are all the major aspects related to the Summary of the Employment-at-Will. This doctrine is followed in the United States at large whereas other countries, which has provided a chance of ‘good faith’ includes Canada, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Italy and Sweden. At-will doctrine serves to provide the employer the liberty to terminate any employee with or without any good or bad cause. Nevertheless, the good cause commitments are stated to the employee at the time of recruitment so that they can have their job security issues resolved (Free Dictionary,...

Words: 1631 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Employment at Will

...Assignment 1: Employment-At-Will Doctrine Employment-at-will is the current employment practice performed in the United States. Employment-at-will states that an employer can terminate an employee for any reason; good, bad or indifferent. It also allows the employee to leave the employment of the company at any time and for any reason. Over the years following the adoption of the employment-at-will doctrine, there have been some exceptions applied that employers must follow when it comes to terminating their employees In the 1980s, employees started to lose more when terminated. This was due to the increase in the number of people working for someone else. Upon termination, employees were losing pension, insurance, and any other benefit they were receiving while employed. Employees started to become more and more dissatisfied with the employment-at-will doctrine and started to challenge it by bringing suits to the courts claiming Wrongful Discharge. (Employment at will, 2013) Many of these suits won and the courts created exceptions to the employment-at-will practice. These exceptions now make it difficult for an employer to terminate an employee without the individual trying to sue for damages. These exceptions can be broadly grouped into 4 categories. These are Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, “breach of contract by the employer, breach of an implied Covenant of Good Faith and fair dealing, and violation of public policy by the employer.” (Employment......

Words: 2237 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Legal and Ethical Considerations in Employment Selection

...Legal and Ethical Considerations in Employment Selection Cardinal Stritch University Cathy Carew Instructor John Koehler MGT-445 Human Resource Management II July 25, 2013 Legal and Ethical Considerations in Employment Selection Organizations use screening tools such as assessment tests, medical tests and drug testing to effectively find applicants or current employees that are best qualified for a particular job. There are legal and ethical considerations that need to be applied when using any type of assessment test, or medical and drug testing; the selection process should follow federal employment laws, show reliability and validity, exclude bias, as well as protect the test taker’s individual rights and security of information. Assessment tools that are used by employers to make hiring decisions must follow professional and legal principals. Employment laws and regulations disallow discrimination and give equal employment opportunities for all. The U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration created an assessment guide for organizations to use as a guide in the employment selection process. In the assessment guide Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Tower Amendment to Title VII state that professionally developed workplace tests can be used to make employment decisions only if the test does not discriminate against any one particular group (U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration, 1999). ...

Words: 1108 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ethical Issues in Employment Law

...Ethical Issues in Employment Law Ethical Issues in Employment Law Employment discrimination is illegal. Or is it? The answer is, yes and no. Employers may not discriminate against employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin due to a civil rights bill passed by John F. Kennedy in 1963, otherwise known as Title VII. Employers may, however, discriminate if there is a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ). For example, a clothier who only sells women’s clothing may only want to hire female models to show their clothes to potential buyers; a company like GNC (General Nutrition Center) may only want to hire employees who are fit and know about fitness products to become salespeople in their stores. An Act of Law that followed in 1978 is the Pregnancy Discrimination Act which states employers or potential employers cannot discriminate against women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant. Although this Act exists, this type of discrimination happens often. In July of 1999, I changed jobs and accepted a position at Merrill Lynch here in Denver. In September of that year, I found out, and announced to my employer, that I was expecting and due the next May. The following month, my boss called me into the office and a Human Resources representative was also present. After exchanging a few pleasantries, I found out that I was being let go because I had a forgery charge on my criminal history that I did not disclose on my application. I told......

Words: 538 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Ethical and Legal Considerations in Pre-Employment Testing

...WHAT ARE ETHICAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS IN PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING? WHAT ARE ETHICAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS IN PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING? There are many ethical and legal considerations to take into account when employers conduct pre-employment testing. Prior to implementing a testing program, employers would be wise to seek legal advice to confirm that the testing will not violate any employment or EEOC laws. It is important that tests be reviewed by professionals for reliability and validity to ensure that the characteristics and skills being tested are relative to the job’s essential functions and to be sure that the test is not conducive to bias and/or creating an adverse impact on any class of applicant. Any applicant taking a pre-employment test has the right to privacy and feedback under the American Psychological Association’s (APA) standard for educational and psychological testing. This particular list of rights is not legally enforceable, but the items on the list are ethical considerations of which employers who wish to be viewed as reputable and credible should be aware. These ethical considerations from the APA state that applicants who take pre-employment tests should be able to expect the following rights: * The right to the confidentiality of test results. * The right to informed consent regarding use of these results. * The right to expect that only people qualified to interpret the scores will have access to them, or that......

Words: 611 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Employment at Will

...Employment-At-Will Doctrine Sherita Pittman October 26, 2014 Master of Business Administration LEG 500 Strayer University Employment and employee go hand and hand at some point in life. Work is defined as, exertion or effort directed to produce or accomplish something; labor; toil and employment is, an occupation by which a person earns a living; work; business (Dictionary.reference.com (2014). As the Chief Operating Officer (COO) in a midsize company preparing for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). I have discovered multiple personnel problems that require immediate attention and faced with difficult decisions to be made. In this paper I will discuss the employment-at-will-doctrine and examine three scenarios described, analyze whether legally I can fire the employees by including an assessment of any pertinent expectations to employment-at-will doctrine, the primary actions I should take to limit liability and impact on operations and examine the state’s policy on employment-at-will by analyzing one real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five-year. As an astute manager, I have analyze the employment-at-will doctrine and determine what, if any, exceptions and liabilities exist before taking any action. As I proceed with the investigation, I discover the company has no whistleblower policy. The employment-at-will doctrine is the legal doctrine that gives employers a broad discretion to fire......

Words: 1016 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Employment at Will

...Employment-At-Will Doctrine This paper will cover what legal rights employers have and whether they have the right to follow an employment-at-will doctrine. As the newly hired Chief Operating Officer (COO), I am faced with multiple personnel problems. There are eight different scenarios that I have to assess and determine what action to take against the employee, whether the employee can be fired, and what action will limit liability and impact on operations. I have also discovered that the company has no whistle blower policy and now need to decide if I should suggest that we adopt a whistle blower policy. The United States is among only a handful of countries that follow an employment-at-will doctrine, the only state that does not is Montana. Unlike the United States, most countries can only fire employees if there is a cause. The United States can fire employees for no cause, employees could walk into his/her place of employment tomorrow and be fired. The company also does not have to give a reason for firing the employee. “At-will means that an employer can terminate an employee at any time for any reason, except an illegal one, or for no reason without incurring legal liability. Likewise, an employee is free to leave a job at any time for any or no reason with no adverse legal consequences” (NCSL). Employment-at-will also means that employers have the right to change contracts at any time. For instance, employers can reduce paid time off or change benefits. ...

Words: 2226 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

At Will Employment

...AT-WILL-EMPLOYMENT Written By: Karla McCleskey Submitted to : G. Alexander Weimer, Jr LEG 500 January, 23, 2011 1 In the United States employees without a written employment contract can be fired “for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all”. This topic alone has been around since the nineteenth century, and has given employers unfettered power to dismiss their employees without being thereby guilty of a legal wrong. Many employees believe that great job performance will allow them to have job security, but the expectation that you could not get fired because of doing a “great job” has lost value and many of those “great” employees have found themselves laid off, and terminated without cause. Many ethical issues may arise when discussing employment at will, because if an employer fires an employer for no cause at all, critics will soon follow the employers behavior. There could also be many problems that come with employment-at-will, like the legal precedent, backlash of potential employees, and resentment from current employees. The book explains that the earliest adjustment to the right to work doctrine were made when workers fought for the right to organize and form labor unions. In 1935 the Supreme Court guaranteed these rights, and announced that employers could not intimidate their employees with the at-will-employment doctrine. Beginning in the 1960s, federal civil rights laws were created against those......

Words: 1163 - Pages: 5