Free Essay

Democrat and the Dictator

In: Historical Events

Submitted By ajv13
Words 637
Pages 3
The Democrat and the Dictator

Abigail Villaflores

President Franklin D. Roosevelt addresses the many issues such as unemployment, failure of trade, and the overall struggles of the economy. Roosevelt (1989) states a very important fact, “We are stricken by no plague of locusts” (p. 4) He mentions how U.S. citizens should be grateful that the issues they face are of “material things” unlike the dangers that their forefathers had to deal with. The U.S. is facing problems of decreased economic values; increased taxes; farmers with produce but no means of selling them; and in addition thousands of families no longer have any saving’s left (Roosevelt, p. 2, 1989). The U.S. problems are not due to lack of material but rather the problem are those who are in charge for the exchange of goods. These leaders or “money changers,” had no vision and were influencing people in the wrong way, showing having possessions was where happiness lies.
Roosevelt wanted to change the morals and ethics that happiness was not in possessions but rather the work being put into gaining such possessions. Therefore Roosevelt believed that handling with problem of employment was a priority, “Our greatest primary task is to put people to work” (1989). Furthermore Roosevelt mentioned that two things need to happen to assure growth of the economy to prevent reverting to old ways: one being strict supervision of all banking, credits, and investments (p. 14, 1989). Roosevelt addresses how each of the Nations are interdependent on one another and wanted to implement the policy of a good neighbor to ensure recovery (Roosevelt, p 15, 1989). By being a good neighbor the country is respect the sanctity of its agreements with its world of neighbors. Unlike the U.S., Germany had many more problems that need to be overcome. Adolf Hitler believes Germany was blinded by promises made to them resulting loss in their freedom. Germany did not receive equality or the association from other nations as they were promised years ago. More over millions of Germans after WWI have been left unemployed and starving. If their issues are not addressed Hitler believes that Germany will be left with an immeasurable disaster. Hitler spoke more about how communism was a primary reason for the economy being in shambles (Berlin, 1933). Based on his statement, “We recognize no classes, we see only the German people, millions of peasants, bourgeois, and workers who will either overcome together the difficulties of these times or be overcome by them,” (Berlin, 1933) he mentioned the best way for the country to succeed is if they are united. Hitler aims to rid the class system and work united with a four-year plan. During the four-year plan Germany aims to overcome unemployment, rescue Germany’s peasants, and reorganize its government.
Both Adolf Hitler and Franklin D. Roosevelt are both trying to implement solutions to improve the unemployment status of their people as well improve outcome of trading with other nations. Each of these leaders intended to improve the use of farming land as well as establish more secure rules for banks. Hitler was Germany’s Furher granting him more power over the country. Roosevelt on the other hand was leading a democratic government and needed the support of other members before implementing his ideas. They were each able to gain supporters with the belief they would be able to deliver the change each of their countries needed however, since Hitler had more control it took less convincing than Roosevelt needed.

Berlin: Proclamation To The German Nation -- February 1, 1933. (n.d.). Retrieved March 20, 2016, from
Franklin D. Roosevelt: First Inaugural Address. U.S. Inaugural Addresses. 1989. (n.d.). Retrieved March 20, 2016, from…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Democrat vs. Republican

...beliefs. Some instances, many beliefs overlap. So what are the differences between Democrats and Republicans? There are clear principles that distinguish Republicans from Democrats. Republicans are conservative while Democrats are liberal. Republicans believe that taxes shouldn’t be increased for anyone, and wages should reflect the free market. Whereas, the Democrats favor minimum wages and progressive taxation i.e. higher tax rates for higher sections. Democrats support abortion. Republicans oppose abortion. Democrats prefer to keep the law as it is and permit the guardians to decide on to keep or to not to keep their baby. People commit errors of engaging in intercourse, uncommonly adolescents and little grown-ups. They might as well have an opportunity to alter their errors. Abortion is exceptional, it gives an opening to uproot the load of an unwilling accepted. Republicans uphold the rule that each human conceived and unborn has a key, single power to existence; accordingly, they are in opposition to abortion. Republicans think the unborn child has the right to life which cannot be infringed. The colors and symbols are different for the Democrats and Republicans. Democrats’ symbol is a donkey and their color is blue and for Republicans it is an elephant and the color is red. Republicans are conservatives, and this usually means that they are more for everyone for themselves. Democrats are liberal, they favor healthcare for people who can’t afford it. Provided that we...

Words: 1212 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Jacksonian Democrats

...Jacksonian Democrats helped to create a more democratic America and because of this, believed to be many things, some real and some fictional. In most cases they perceived themselves as defenders of equal economic opportunity, even though they occasionally put their own interests before those of the people. They also thought of themselves as guardians of political democracy, while using class differences to their advantage to bring support. Jacksonian Democrats felt that they were the protectors of the Constitution and of individual liberties but many times they put their rivalry with the Northeastern industry and Whig politics before these ideals. While Jacksonians correctly viewed themselves as guardians of political democracy, equal economic opportunity, and individual liberty, they were often more interested in developing these concepts rather than protecting them. Jackson was a strong opponent of the unequal and aristocrat dominated economic structure in most of America. He was very against the Bank of America because he believed it to have a monopoly on banking and felt that it was owned and run unjustly by wealthy aristocrats who were not always true Americans (B). It must also be noted however, that while the Bank of America was undoubtedly corrupt (Nicholas Biddle was known to have given sums of money to close friends, and was also known to regularly bribe newspapers and similar media.) it also did what it was supposed to do very well. It provided money and......

Words: 1035 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Vote Democrat

...London 2 America Should Vote Democrat America should vote Democrat in the upcoming election. This will give President Obama a chance to finish what he's started and keep republicans from coming into office increasing taxes for lower and middle class families. Americans seemed happy while under the Democrat administration. The Republicans want to increase taxes for the lower and middle class Americans and lower taxes for the rich upper class Americans; which economically doesn't make sense. The Republicans also want to change the way Americans receive their Medicare by giving out vouchers. By doing this, Americans will lose some of their benefits. The Republicans seem to have no idea about the struggle of the American people. If they did, perhaps Republican candidate Mitt Romney wouldn’t have made the statement that "Forty six percent of Americans are dependent on the government" that’s evidence that the Republicans are not in touch with the American people. Over the last four years Americans seemed happy while being under the democrat administration. Businesses start booming and the economy was slowly starting to pick up. America wasn’t built in one day and certainly can't be fixed in one day. With that being stated, America should......

Words: 339 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Napoleon Was Nothing More Than a Dictator in His Rule of France Between 1799 and 1815. How Far Do You Agree?

...Napoleon was nothing more than a dictator in his rule of France between 1799 and 1815. How far do you agree? “History is a version of events which everyone has agreed on” - Napoleon Napoleon was nothing more than a tyrant as he exploited France in pursuit of his own ambitions to achieve a dynasty in his name. A dictatorship is often associated with repression and the workings of a police state. Both of these were, in fact, being used in France . For example Napoleon vigorously censored the press and even the theatre. When Napoleon took power, Paris had a vibrant newspaper business, by the end of his reign there were only four newspapers left due to his denial of a free-press and all of these had been under his control. These newspapers were censored and used by Napoleon for propaganda. He also had spies and informers working for his Ministry of Police, he used special courts and arbitrary imprisonment which really supports the concept of a police state under a dictatorship. Implementing these resources allowed Napoleon to repress any opposition to his rule and crush any civil unrest Considering these facts only it would appear that Napoleon was nothing but a tyrannical dictator , but , this would not necessarily be a fair judgment as throughout his reign he continued to use certain administrative bodies which limited his freedom of action , such as the Senate and the Legislative Body which suggests he didn’t have or want overall power as a dictator for matters such......

Words: 987 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Was Hitler a Weal Dictator

...Was Hitler a Weak Dictator? David Williamson examines two seemingly irreconcilable schools of though Perhaps of all the exam questions set on the Third Reich, `Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?' is the most difficult. It leads to the heart of the complex Intentionalist-Structuralist debate. On the one hand, there are the Intentionalist historians who argue forcefully in the words of Norman Rich that `Hitler was master in the Third Reich', while the Structuralists stress the many constraints on Hitler's power which range from his own personal inadequacies to the limits imposed upon him by the structure of the Nazi party and state. Mommsen, for instance, argues that he was `in many ways a weak dictator', (1) and David Irving in one of his earlier and less outrageous books even goes so far as to describe him as `probably the weakest leader Germany has known this century'. (2) The weak dictator/leader argument is paradoxical and is bitterly contested by a formidable array of historians who include, amongst many others, Bullock, Bracher, Dawidowicz, Hildebrand, and Jackel, who argue that Hitler had a programme and possessed the necessary powers to implement it. Bracher and Bullock, for instance, see Hitler as an immensely cunning politician who would use any tactic to further his aims. Bullock stresses that his foreign policy is only explicable if seen as a combination of `consistency of aim with complete opportunism in method and tactics'. (3) It is certainly hard to make out a......

Words: 3349 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

The Determined Dictator

...The Determined Dictator Julius Caesar has been quoted to have said, “I love the name of honor, more than I fear death” (“Julius Caesar Quotes”). That one quote tells a lot about Caesar’s attitude and his character. More than once, this determination to receive honor risked his life, but it also gained him many achievement that he has been remembered for for hundreds and hundreds of years. In the end, that same desire for honor cost him his life. Julius Caesar deserved the honor he received though. He was a self-made man who earned his respect and admiration by his own talents, wisdom, and strengths. (“Portrait”) William Shakespeare described him as a “General, Statesman, Dictator – the most famous Roman of them all” (“Julius Caesar”). Julius Caesar’s political statute, his military leadership, and his tragic assassination all reflected his desire to make a change in his country and his perseverance to achieve his goal. One area of Julius Caesar’s life where he persevered to make a change in Rome was his political statute. Julius Caesar was born in one hundred B.C. (“Portrait”). He was born into a patrician family (Crew). His father was a great politician and taught Julius as much as he could. Julius Caesar’s first job was a speaker in the Roman courts. He was very successful and eventually was elected to the office of praetor, or commanding officer of the army, which was the second ranked political office of his time (Crew). He was so popular among his peers......

Words: 1496 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Democrats and Their Lies

...nation’s power plants 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030, according to people briefed on the plan. The proposed rule amounts to the strongest action ever taken by the United States government to fight climate change. Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of the greenhouse gas emissions that scientists blame for trapping heat in the atmosphere and dangerously warming the planet. The rule could trigger a fundamental transformation of the nation’s energy systems – if it withstands an expected onslaught of legal and legislative attacks. In his first term, Mr. Obama tried but failed to push a sweeping climate change bill through Congress. But now, as many Republicans question the science of climate change, and even as many Democrats from coal-dependent states fear that a climate change bill could damage their economies, Mr. Obama is moving ahead on his own. He is using the executive authority under the 1970 Clean Air Act to issue the regulation. Under the proposal to be unveiled on Monday, states will be given a wide menu of policy options to achieve the pollution cuts. Rather than immediately shutting down coal plants, states will be allowed to reduce emissions by making changes across their electricity systems – by installing new wind and solar generation, energy-efficiency technology and by starting or joining state and regional “cap-and-trade” programs, in which states agree to cap carbon pollution and buy and sell permits to pollute. In a 2009......

Words: 302 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

How to Bring Down a Dictator

... How to bring down a dictator By Abebe Gellaw | May 29, 2012 Editor's Note - The following paper by Abebe Gellaw was first published in March 2011. Given its timelessness, the paper is being published for the second time. “Freedom is not free; you have to pay for it.” Anonymous In May 2005, over 2 million Ethiopians came out in full force to demand change Imagine the power all these people wield collectively when they decide to act together for radical change, dignity and freedom Nonviolent struggle is a smart option for Ethiopians to end tyranny As ordinary Egyptians have erupted in jubilant euphoria at Tahrir Square and on the streets of Egypt after the fall of the three-decade long dictator Hosni Mubarak, Ethiopians in and outside of the country have been keenly watching the wind of change from North Africa. We have witnessed history unfolding once again. When people are determined to be free, nothing can stop them. After an epic struggle against him, Mubarak had no choice but to surrender. The world is a better place with the fall of one more dictator. What a beautiful moment to celebrate and watch! The momentous events in Egypt and Tunisia are testimony to the power of nonviolent struggle. When people are united and speak in one voice, nothing can stop them. No guns and tanks have stopped the peaceful revolutions that have ended tyranny and ushered in liberation to ordinary people in many countries across the world. Ethiopians also know what revolutions are like.......

Words: 7975 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Dorchester Democrat Sentenced to 6 Months in Assault Case

...Dorchester Democrat Sentenced to 6 months in assault case A 37 year old state representative, Carlos Henriquez, was sentenced to six months in prison after a jury had convicted him of punching a woman in the chest after she had refused to have sex with him. The district judge; Michele Hogan, said, “when a woman tells you she doesn’t want to have sex, that means she does not want to have sex.” Hogan’s sentence for Henriquez was two and a half years, in the house of correction, yet he ordered Henriquez to serve only 6 months of the sentence that Henriquez was given. However; Middlesex prosecutors had asked that Henriquez be ordered to serve 1 year of a 2 and a half year sentence, which would be the maximum for assault and battery. Henriquez’s lawyer, Stephanie Soriano-Mills, asked Hogan for Henriquez’s sentence to be probation and to acquit on some of the charges. Stephanie Soriano-Mills had called the sentence harsh. In other words, this case has to do with assault and battery. The meaning of battery is to touch someone unlawfully. The definition of assault is the attempt to try to commit battery. Assault as a tort and a crime are different. A victim of a tort must know that the person that had committed the tort, meant to commit harm. Trying to commit harm is necessary when trying to establish fear. Assault and battery are usually committed together. You cannot commit battery without committing assault. On the other hand, assault can be committed without......

Words: 517 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Difference Between Democrats and Republicans

...Is There Really a Difference between the Republican and Democratic Parties? Throughout modern American history, there have been many debates between the Rupublicans and the Democrats. Whether it comes down to what they've done for the american government or how each party differs from one another, there's no question that these two parties are the driving force behind what we know today as the American Government. The truth is, these parties greatly differ from one another and is shown through party ideologies, organization, and certain events in history. The history of the oldest running political party in the world is a complex and diverse one. The democrats, founded by Thomas Jefferson himself, have gone through numerous trials and tribulations to be the politcal party it is today. Stemming from conflicts with the Federalists over Jay's Treaty, it was apparent that " a deep rooted philosophical difference existed between the two factions"( Rutland 10). Because of this struggle for power and differences between the two factions, the Democratic-Republican party was born. Throughout it's history, the democratic party has held onto a few specific ideals that make them different from the republicans. First and foremost, the democratic party started from two main ideals that stem from the Declaration of Indepence, liberty and equality for all. Jefferson believed that the working class people of America werent being treated fairly compared to the wealthy class and......

Words: 252 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Mindset of Dictators

...narcissistic, schizoid and schizotypal. All three dictators also showed evidence of psychotic thought processes. The implications of these findings for negotiations are discussed. Mindset of Dictators The Founding Fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution 225 years ago with the greatest vision in their mind: to create a unity in which the people would be treated equally, they would be provided justice and security. They intended to create a unity, in which the general welfare and liberty of the people would be assured. True Americans share the same sentiments and not only do they live by these rules, but they also strive to share this vision with other nations around the world. The American nation gets greatly offended when they see any human being's rights violated, and they feel obligated to intervene and fight for liberty in behalf of the less fortunate people. They do that in hope of ending dictatorship once and for all. Sharing these values with other nations is extremely challenging though, because people who have been oppressed for several generations cannot imagine living in any other way, they do not understand the benefits of liberty and they often resist outside help. American politicians wonder what motivates these dictators to be so cruel, and they try to initiate conversations with them. What they often fail to realize is that negotiation is off the table when it comes to discussing human rights with dictators. These leaders suffer from multiple......

Words: 678 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Movie Rview for the Great Dictator

...Movie review “The Great Dictator” “The Great Dictator” is a 1940 war comedy of when Hitler or (Adenoid Hynkel as played by Charles Chaplin) started World War 2 but with a funny,awkward,weird,and a dramatic twist. Which becomes very obvious right when the movie starts. The basic plot point to this movie would be Adenoid Hynkel Trying to build a new world all together while a hometown barber is trying to not be arrested by Hynkel’s militia. (who is also played by Charles Chaplin). This movie was not only acted in but written and directed by Charles Chaplin, but many more big faces in this movie like, Paulette Goddard who played a shy but very sweet women named Hannah, and Jack Oakie who played a bit of a bipolar character named Napaloni. The mechanics of this movie were surprisingly well for how old it is. Lets just say with the technology the director had he used the most out of it to make this movie “great”. The acting in this movie could have been A LOT better but you sort of have to give the actors some leeway because this movie is such a high paced movie, there are no breaks in any scene. The music in this film had to be phenomenal because Charles Chaplin was always a silent actor in all his films until this one.Now then, the editing that happened in this movie, to me was absolutely horrible, after almost every scene it would hop to a completely different scene across the world that made no sense to the plot and was just there for a cheap way to stick a joke in.......

Words: 492 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Explain How the Ideas of the Liberal Democrats Influenced Coalition Government Policy

...Explain how the ideas of the Liberal Democrats influenced Coalition Government Policy During their time in the Coalition Government, the Liberal Democrats have influenced the Coalition Government Policy in many ways. For example, Nick Clegg’s party has influenced the presence of gay marriage to be legal, prevented Michael Gove from introducing a two-tier exam to replace GCSEs, resisted Conservatives’ proposals to completely reform the NHS, cutting out the lowest paid earners of tax, and scrapping the Conservatives’ idea of a ‘Snooper Charter’. Firstly, the Liberal Democrats supported the Conservatives’ idea that those with the lowest personal incomes are to be cut out of income tax, which totals to over 880,000 individuals. This would allow low-earners to be able to live off more, increasing their personal allowance to £10,600, which was a joint effort from both parties, not just the Liberal Democrats. However, the Liberal Democrats have delivered a new 7% stamp duty on homes sold exceeding £2 million, also known as “Mansion tax”. In terms of the healthcare, Nick Clegg’s party has been resistant and successful in delaying the Conservatives proposals to completely restructure the NHS, which would have ended up being privatized, leading to people having to pay to be treated. Home Secretary Theresa May proposed that security services should be given the power to have access to everyone’s phone and email records, social media and internet activity, which would damage......

Words: 383 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Dictators and How to Help Current Dictators.

...There were four major dictators around the time between WW1 and WW2. Vladimir Lenin was one. Known as Lenin, he was elected as Chair of the Council of People’s Commissars in 1917. Lenin created a secret police called the Cheka to secure the new Bolshevik government. The Cheka made sure nobody would get in the way and kept public newspapers from saying anything about Lenin that Lenin didn’t want. Lenin died from a stroke in 1924. Josef Stalin rose to power after the death of Lenin in 1924. During Stalin’s rule, “Stalinism” was created; he called himself a Marxist but accepted the term. Stalin created the “five year plan” which insisted on in five years things will be better, four of these five year plans were made. In 1932 Stalin came up with the “Great Purge” in where all the non loyal members of the government were killed. Stalin didn’t want anybody that saw wrong in the way he ruled and speak out. Because he killed all of the smart people there were not many people to stop him. After the Great Purge all the old communist party members were gone and all that was left were Stalin followers, increasing Stalin’s power in the country to semi-god. Stalin also created the Gulag which were very brutal work camps. Over 18 million people passed through the camp from being late to work, petty theft, saying something bad about the government, and other small things. Most people died or were deported from these work camps. Stalin under much paranoia from Hitler died of a......

Words: 764 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Democrat and the Dictator

...Case Study #3: The Democrat and The Dictator Quite obviously, in Hitler’s Proclamation to the German Nation of 1933, he addresses one of the issue he believes to be the root cause of Germany’s problems. He states, “More than fourteen years have passed since the unhappy day when the German people, blinded by promises from foes at home and abroad, lost touch with honor and freedom, thereby losing all” (p 1). He goes on to say, “We never received the equality and fraternity we had been promised, and we lost our liberty to boot. For when our nation lost its political place in the world, it soon lost its unity of spirit and will” (p 1). Fourteen years ago would have been 1918, the end of World War I, followed then by the Treaty of Versailles. He also states that “the Marxist (communist) parties and their lackeys have had fourteen years to show what they can do. The result is a heap of ruins” (p 2). Clearly, he is also blaming communism for the continued ruin of Germany. FDR, on the other hand, blames “the rulers of the exchange of mankind’s goods”, “the unscrupulous money changers” in his First Inaugural Address of 1933. He states, the banks “failed, through their own stubbornness and their own incompetence” (p 2). Roosevelt blames the banks for the nation’s problems. According to Hitler, there were to be two four-year plans to deal with unemployment, finance and economy, agriculture and foreign policy. First and foremost, “One decisive step is absolutely necessary first:...

Words: 609 - Pages: 3