Premium Essay

Constitution Law, Reasonable Suspicion V Probable Cause

In: Other Topics

Submitted By KFortin
Words 1507
Pages 7
Kristen Fortin
Kaplan University

CJ:140 Introduction to Constitutional Law
Professor Robert Winters
February 22, 2014

Abstract: Pertaining to the differences between probable cause and reasonable suspicion within law enforcement can determine the difference between a legal search and seizure and police officers obtaining evidence in an illegal manner. Officers need to handle each situation when probable cause and reasonable suspicion is involved. Determining what is reasonable and what is not takes great skill, perseverance, comprehension of the law, and an innate intuitiveness on the part of the officer. The Fourth Amendment clearly defines the exceptions to the warrant requirement. There are several exceptions pertaining to a legal, valid search and seizure without a warrant. Officers must possess the specific, lawful knowledge pertaining to such events, and do so without violating any one’s constitutional rights. Within this essay I will define and discus the differences between probable cause and reasonable suspicion, as well what constitutes reasonableness. Also, I will discus four of the Fourth Amendment’s exceptions to the warrant requirement with several examples.

Probable Cause: The Fourth Amendment guards the peoples right from unreasonable search and seizures, and stipulates that “no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause.” (Bill of Rights; The Fourth Amendment, 1791). Probable Cause can be defined as obvious factual evidence obtained by the means of a logical inquiry by a law enforcement agent that would lead them to believe a detained person(s) has committed an illegal action, thus necessitating to his or her conviction. Probable cause is a constitutional obligation that warrants, both search and arrest, be determined upon the…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

California State Constitution V. U.S. Constitution

...California State Constitution v. U.S. Constitution HIS/301 William Liesman September 4, 2012 California State Constitution v. U.S. Constitution Monterey, California; the year was 1849 a group of Californians gathered at their first Constitutional convention to talk and construct a government to maintain law and order. In October 1849 a California State Constitution was adopted, outlining founding principles as a territory. Once California became a State in 1850 the newly adopted Constitution remained in place up to present day. ("Teachergenius", 2012). The California Constitution is similar in many ways to the United States Constitution. Example of this is; Article III California Constitution divided State Government into three branches: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, the same as the U.S. Constitution. ("Teachergenius", 2012). There also are many differences between the two Constitutions. First; the California Constitution allows the Governor to line veto bills that have been submitted for approval, this means that the governor can accept some parts of the bill and delete other parts, and the President of the United States can only veto the entire bill. ("National Constitution Center", 2012). Second difference is; the Lieutenant Governor, which is equivalent to the U.S. Vice President, is elected by the voters separately from the State Governor, according to Article V (Executive Department). In the U.S.......

Words: 565 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Public Law V Bogdanor and S Vogenauer; Enacting a British Constitution: Some Problems’, 2008.

...PUBLIC LAW V Bogdanor and S Vogenauer; Enacting a British Constitution: some problems’, 2008. One must understand that most of the countries now have a written and a codified Constitution, such as the United States of the America, Malaysia, India, Australia and etc. As we know these countries are under the British colonies before getting their independence. Hence now there are only three states in the world which lacks a written constitution, namely Britain, New Zealand, and Israel. A constitution is a set of rules which defines the structures and functions of a state, particularly, will define the principle of institutions, the legislature, the executive, judiciary and the nature and the scope of their powers. Moreover, Bradley and Ewing have defined a constitution as ‘ a document having special legal sanctity which sets out the framework and the principle functions of the organs of government within the state and declares the principles by which those organs must operate’. (A Bradley and K Ewing, Constitutional and Administrative Law (14th edn, Pearson/Longman, 2007), p.4) [1]In the introduction of a state’s constitution, there will be a discovery of a preamble, for example, in the USA the preamble states that: ‘We the people...do ordain and establish this Constitution’. (Article 2 of the 1936 Soviet Constitution.)[2] This shows the society as a sovereign power. An important question that often rises is “Should Britain adopts a written constitution”? This has always......

Words: 2597 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Assessment on Laws - 3 Case Focus

...Authentic Case Assessment on Laws Authentic Case Assessment on Laws The Fourth Amendment The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The law that governs arrests, searches and seizures, and issuance of warrants (arrest warrants and search warrants) is the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, above cited in toto. The Fourth Amendment is applicable only to government arrests as opposed to privately conducted ones, and in cases when the privacy of a person is intruded upon as when a search or arrest is conducted. The provision implicitly advances the exclusionary rule in criminal procedure which states to the effect that no evidence is admissible in court that was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment (Bacigal 2008 p.147). This rule was asserted in the landmark case of Mapp v Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961) where a woman’s house was searched by police authorities, who has acted on a tip that she was hiding certain bomb suspects, without a search warrant. Finding no bomb suspect, the police instead arrested her for the lewd pictures and books found in her basement on the strength of an Ohio law which prohibited their possession. After convicted in the lower court, a conviction that was......

Words: 3450 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Terry V Ohio

...In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1 (1968), the court considered whether police, in the absence of probable cause, can stop, question, or frisk an individual. The case proposed that in order to stop someone for questioning, the Police must have a reasonable suspicion that the person is about to commit or has already committed a crime. If after someone has been stopped, the police want frisk a suspect for weapons, they need to have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and threatening. The Court recognized that the Fourth Amendment protects the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person. At the same time, it recognized that in certain circumstances, public safety might require a limited "seizure," or stop, of an individual against his will. The Court consequently set forth conditions circumscribing when and how the police might conduct a Terry stop. They include what has become known as the "reasonable suspicion" standard. 392 U. S., at 20-22. Justice White, in a separate concurring opinion, set forth further conditions. Justice White wrote: "Of course, the person stopped is not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled, and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest, although it may alert the officer to the need for continued observation." Id., at 34. After Terry v. Ohio case, police officers only needed reasonable suspicion to search a person for weapons. However, the search is strictly limited to weapons. The case did not......

Words: 1027 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure Probable Cause Article Summary

...Criminal Procedure Probable Cause Article Summary Brandy A University of Phoenix Criminal Procedure CJA/353 Professor Joseph Wade April 11, 2012 Criminal Procedure Probable Cause Article Summary The article I choose is Cell phone Tracking Power on Request by Ellen Nakashima from the Washington Post in November of 2007, the reason why I pick this article is because of the way the federal government is violating or has been violating individual Fourth Amendment right by tracking the cell phone of individual that police feel might be suspicious of drug trafficking, criminal suspect, and fugitives with no probable cause and being allowed to do this by some judges. Federal Official are regularly going to judges in order to retrieve cell phone data from cell phone companies on suspected fugitives, drug traffickers, and suspected criminals and in some case the judge has allowed them to without showing the courts any probable causes thinking a crime may be in play or they can find specific evidence to a crime. This proceeding goes on in secretive as order by the government and the information is sealed making it hard to prove injustices. Federal official was granted this data in October 2006 in helping with the capture of a Florida serial killer that linked in four states to six other murders, including the murder of a University of Virginia student at Blue Ridge Parkway, killer kills themselves in shooting with police in Florida. Law......

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The 1992 Constitution and the Laws of the African Union

...AN INTELLECTUAL ENQUIRY OF THE 1992 CONSTITUTION AND ITS RELATION TO THE LAWS OF THE AFRICAN UNION. BY MICHAEL BOATENG YEBOAH , LLB (KNUST) mikeyeblaw@gmail.com INTRODUCTION AND BACKROUND TO THE AFRICAN UNION The African Union (A.U) is a geo-political entity which is carved out of the Union of African States and the Organization of African Unity (O.A.U). The Organization of African Unity was established on 25 May 1963 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia by representatives of 32 governments on the Charter of O.A.U. Upon the dawn of modern political challenges, the charter of the Organization of African Unity was branded African Union (A.U) at Durban on 9 July 2002 by President Thabo Mbeki. The African Union as of now boasts of 53 African States as its members with the exception of Morocco. The withdrawal of Morocco from O.A.U. was primarily due to the massive support Sahrawi nationalists received from the Union. Currently, the headquarters of the African Union is situated at Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The primary cause for the paradigm shift from O.A.U to A.U was that; The O.A.U was politically mandated to see to the emancipation of the colonized African States however upon the emancipation of the entire African states from foreign rule; the need arose for the unification of the balkanized African States. The O.A.U as a result was re-branded A.U. to see to the unification of the entire African states after it adopted the Sirte Declaration at Libya. The A.U has the following......

Words: 2716 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Law Is the Law

...Ohio V. Robinette Presented By: Ricky Mendez December 1, 2011 Outline I. The Case Ohio V. Robinette II. Trial Court Out Come III. Appeals Court’s Decision The Case Ohio V. Robinette In Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), the U.S. Supreme court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist’s car (Wikipedia 2011). In the case, respondent Robert D. Robinette was stopped for speeding by Deputy Roger Newsome of the Montgomery County Sheriff Office, since he had no prior violation; the officer gave him a verbal warning and returned his driver’s license(Cornell University Law School 1996). Shortly After, the deputy asked Robinette, before he gets going whether he was carrying any illegal contraband, weapons, drug’s, or such things in his car. That’s when Robinette answered that he did not have any of those things in his car. Then the deputy asked him if he would let him search the car for such things and Robinette gave consent to a search of the car. At the same time Robinette, felt like he had to let the officer search the car because he did not know that he could have simply said no and been free to go. Robinette, along with many other citizens feel that they do not have a choice in denying a request by a police officer. They are not familiar with the laws and rights that they have, especially during a routine......

Words: 1750 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Introduction to American Constitution Law

...------------------------------------------------- INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION 7_4_2014 The idea is that there must be a tension between the different branches of the State power. This differs from the European style system because when you think about the normal situation where you have a prime minister, the reality is that in most countries, the PM becomes PM because he holds the majority in the legislative branch. So almost necessarily, the party who has the majority in the executive power also has it in the legislative power. In fact, Americans typically LIKE divided governments. If you want an example of that, just look at the last presidents of the US. Bill Clinton e.g. was a member of the Democratic Party while the congress was held by the Democratic Party as well. However, interestingly enough, that situation lasted only 2 years, after which the Americans decided to elect a republican president: Bush. The same happened more or less to Bush, and after that to Barack Obama. This is called the Fundamental Split between political parties. As part of that, what happened is that American people were able to express their ideas. They often like to have one party at power in the Congress and another party at power in the Government. What if a third party develops himself? One of the two parties will try to move towards the same ideas. They do have third party candidates in Congress, but their power is very small. It’s an idea that is embraced by the......

Words: 7876 - Pages: 32

Free Essay

Biz Law

...Code) = Civil Law System US has the common law (common law will only be found in former British states) Sare Decisis (Case Precedent) Chapter 1 Sources 1. Constitution (s) – 51 (States and Federal) 1.5 -- Treaty 2. Case Law 3. Legislature (s) – 51 4. Administrative – help in regulation (Federal, State, and Local level) Chapter 2 State Top Level – Supreme Court Middle Lever – Court of Appeals Lowest Level – Superior Court The only state where the Supreme Court is the lowest is New York Federal Top Level – Supreme Court Middle Level – Circuit Court Lowest Level – District Court Jurisdiction – the power of a court to hear a case The two bottom courts are trial courts and have original jurisdiction Top two have appellate jurisdiction. State jurisdiction 1. Subject –matter jurisdiction (apply to the CT) + (2-5 apply to the person you are suing) 2. Personal jurisdiction – domicile 3and4 relate to property 3. In Rem – dispute is about the property itself 4. Quasi in Rem – breach of contract (attach the prop to the dispute) 5. Long arm statute – minimum contact rule. Revenue 15% Example: purchased a toy from a biz in Indiana. Child got hurt and wants to sue the person. You can use the 5th rule. The judge will order and accounting and if the rev is equal to or higher than 15% the trail is heard in Cali if lower than the trail is heard in Indiana. Federal 1. Federal question – is a federal law an issue? Is a federal law violate?......

Words: 1759 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Law of the 4th Amendment

...The 4th Amendment, and Article 1 Section 12 of the NY constitution prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures. A search or seizure is unreasonable when performed by the Government and not authorised by the warrant or conducted under circumstances given rise to an exception to the warrant requirement. The 4th Amendment does not prohibit, or require a warrant for reasonable searches and seizures. It is a restraint on government or state action, but does not prohibit private reasonable or unreasonable searches of seizures. The 4th Amendment does not require a warrant for searches of US citizen on foreign soil. Prob: Wife searched H briefcase and found videos in which H featured their 13 year daughter in a pornographic film. W turned the film over to a friend, a police officer, who used it to obtain an arrest warrant. H could not claim a 4th Amendment violation to suppress the film, because W is not an agent for the state, and thus there was no state action. For a warrant to issue a detached disinterest magistrate must find that the Government has demonstrated a substantial basis of probable cause. The Government must be able to show objectively that taking into account the experience and expertise of the officer, (i) for an arrest warrant it is more probable than not that a crime has been committed and that the person to be arrested committed that crime, or (ii) for a search warrant that is more probable than not that evidence of a crime or contraband......

Words: 3292 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

American Constitution Law

...Constitutional Law Names Institution Constitutional law Answer 1 In Clause 2 of Section 2 of Article III of the U.S Constitution, the Supreme Court is appointed with two types of jurisdictions namely original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction. The former affects all cases relating to ambassadors, other public consuls, public ministers. It also involves the cases that a State shall be Party. Under this jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has the power to order subordinate courts or government officials to perform actions required by law. The scope of this jurisdiction is narrow. It only focuses on the above-mentioned categories and suits between states. Its function is to eliminate the parochialism and bias of state and lower federal courts. Appellate jurisdiction has a wider scope. It involves cases in law, equity, and treaties made; cases of maritime jurisdiction and admiralty; cases between U.S States; cases between citizens and a state; and cases between citizens of either same or different states (The Heritage Foundation, 2012). Answer 2 The Younger Abstention Doctrine prohibits U.S federal courts from handling cases that are within their jurisdiction so that a state court can handle the matter instead. Its function is to maintain a balance between federal and state sovereignty, a fact called comity or federalism, and to avoid friction between the two courts as they conduct legitimate activities. This is because the legal system in the U.S comprises two......

Words: 329 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Rodriguez V. United States

...Rodriguez v. United States For a long time, Americans have been victims not only of torture but also unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by police officers. However, the status has changed after passing of a related legislation which has effected an alteration in the U.S. Constitution. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States has apparently changed the right of the American citizens’ protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. According to the document, individuals have a right to be or feel secured in houses against unreasonable captures and searches. The amendment limits the power of police to search people and seize their homes and property. The applications of the Fourth Amendment in reality, particularly in courts today, have even surprised those who drafted it. The judgment from the case Rodriguez v. the United States is primarily based on the provisions of the document to the Constitution. In this case, a k-9 officer, Morgan Struble, stopped Rodriguez on grounds of driving on the shoulder of a highway, which is a violation of the Nebraska law. The policeman then attended to everything connected with the stopping, including issuing a warning for dangerous driving checking the driving license of Rodriguez. The officer asked the permission to walk his dog around Rodriguez’s car, which was denied. He then ordered the offender to step out of his vehicle while waiting for backup to come. Once the other policemen had arrived at the...

Words: 687 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Canadian Business Law, Reasonable Person

...CANADIAN BUSINESS LAW “REASONABLE PERSON” Assignment # 2 GBMP 511-02 Dated: 18-04-2012 REASONABLE PERSON Question: What is the concept of “Reasonable Person” mean? What is the test that determines whether someone has met that test in law? The Concept: A Reasonable person is a hypothetical person who exercises qualities of attention, knowledge, intelligence, and judgment that society requires of its members for the protection of their own interest and the interests of others. Defining "Reasonable" Being "reasonable" means having the faculty of reason, acting rationally governed by reason. The behavior can be called "reasonable" if the activities can be valued as fair, just, or equitable. The person must be honest, moderate, sane, sensible, and tolerable. "Reasonable" implies a certain standard of valuation. It is a standard for guiding conduct. Reasonable Person This phrase is a personification of the description of "reasonable". Thus, the "reasonable man or person" can be understood as a phrase used to denote a suppositional person who exercises those mentioned qualities which society demands as stated above. Applying the Reasonable Person Standard: The reasonable person does not always appear in the Process of evaluating human behavior. There are several judicial patterns demanding a judgment of reasonableness without expressly mentioning the reasonable man as a personification, such as: reasonable aids, care, diligence, doubt, compensation, (market)......

Words: 4082 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

United States V. Arizona

...States v. Arizona: The Support Our Law Enforcement and Neighborhoods Act is Preempted and Discriminatory Melissa Goolsarran Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Perspective: Immigration, Discrimination, and Limitations on State Laws 3 III. Background: United States v. Arizona 9 A. S.B. 1070 and the Legislature’s Justification 10 B. The Decision: United States v. Arizona 18 IV. Analysis: S.B. 1070 is Preempted by Federal Immigration Law and Also Discriminatory 23 A. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Correctly found that S.B. 1070 is Preempted Because it Interferes with the Administration and Enforcement of Federal Immigration Laws 24 B. S.B. 1070 Discriminates on the Basis of Race or National Origin 32 V. Comment and Conclusion: Effects of the Arizona Law 36 I. Introduction The Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (“S.B. 1070”) has been the subject of many debates for both its potential impact on federal immigration laws and discrimination against citizens and legal residents of Hispanic origin. The Arizona State Legislature passed S.B. 1070 to reduce the continuous rise in the number of illegal immigrants and alleged consequent rise in crime rates in the state. Among other provisions, the law requires officers to check a person's immigration status, criminalizes an alien’s failure to comply with federal registration laws and working without authorization, and authorizes warrantless arrests where there is probable cause to......

Words: 14328 - Pages: 58

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause

...Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause David Sanders Jr. CJA/ 364 June 10, 2012 Matthew Taylor   In the article that I’m going to analyze and regards to the requirements needed for probable cause to conduct a search, seizure or issue an arrest warrant is that of the article publish by Seattle times in 2008. And this particular article, probable cause existed to conduct a search but however to arrest it did not. Law-enforcement agent Brent Hanger on a routine traffic stop pulled over the vehicle belonging to Lacee Hurley, as he approached her vehicle he detected the smell of marijuana. After further investigating he discovered illegal substances and proceeded to arrest Lacee Hurley and her passenger Jeremy Grande. Once the matter of the arrest was taking to court the ruling was overturned due to the fact that not enough evidence existed to form probable cause to commit such in arrest. The reason why was because according to the Supreme Court the arrest was based on the fact that the officer had smelled marijuana from the vehicle and finding illegal substances, however the smell of marijuana can linger in a vehicle for weeks at a time; and the mere presence of the odor doesn’t warrant any officer the right to commit such a such nor an arrest. The other reason why the ruling was overturned was because an innocent person could have been driving the car and not at all be a smoker and now they are being punished for a crime that they didn’t even commit (2011 State Supreme......

Words: 513 - Pages: 3