Free Essay

Assess the Contribution of Social Action Theories to Our Understanding of Society Today?

In: Other Topics

Submitted By kate233
Words 964
Pages 4
Assess the contribution of Social Action Theories to our understanding of society today?
There are some many structural theories put across in today’s society which can be interpreted in many different levels. Structural theories such as Functionalism and Marxism have more of a positivist approach to how they see societies values as they are macro level which means they view society as a real physical thing out there which initially shapes our ideas and behaviour, and they also put the meaning across how to understand people’s behaviour we must first properly understand the social structure that shapes it to what it is today.
Moreover, unlike structural theories which are put across, action theories also bring to the understanding as they are micro level which can be seen as a voluntaristic approach which focuses on the actions and sometimes interactions of individuals as having free will and personal choice. Weber also argues the point how our actions are not determined by society as structural theories specify how we possess agency and so therefore we can shape society through our choices, meanings and actions put forward.
Overall the main critical four actions theories which evaluate our understanding in terms of society today, is Weber’s social action, ethnomethodology, phenomenology and symbolic interactionism. However all these actions specifically differ in how far they see structural explanations of behavior in the everyday surroundings.
Firstly, the main famous action put across was by Weber. He specifically saw both structural and action approaches as important to understand human behavior, he defined these using different levels. The first level he issued out was the ‘level of cause’ which explains the main objectives of structural factors which shape our behaviour in society. The second level was ‘level of meaning’ which initially is the subjective meanings that individuals attach in their actions. For example in Weber’s study of the Rise of Capitalism the protestant reformation introduced a new belief system which was known as ‘Calvinism’ which initially changed peoples view in society which eventually led to a change in behaviour. However when looking at the level of meaning, it had a religious meaning for the Calvinists as by calling God it lead to the accumulation of wealth. When presenting his study, Weber classified the action into four types based on the meaning for the actor which included – Instrumentally rational action: whereby the actor personally distinguishes the best ways of achieving a goal e.g. Capitalist may calculate that the best way to become profitable is to pay low wages. Value-rational action: this was an action put across towards achieving that goal that the actor may regard as desirable for his own benefit e.g. worshipping God in order to get into heaven. Traditional action: which was behaving in a traditional manner and involves habitual actions. Lastly Affectual action: which meant expressing emotion such as crying out of grief of stress.
However Weber’s judgmental actions put across has been criticised on several different levels. Schutz personally argues that Weber’s view of action is too individualistic. For example when an individual at an auction raises their hand or card, it means that they want to make a bid. But Weber personally does not explain how another person who does the same sort of action can have the same meaning he does not justify his point, as e.g. I may raise my hand which means I want to talk such as in a classroom. Other sociologists have also put across that Weber’s use of ‘vestehen’ but again have not explained how we can be the other person to elaborate, as we can never truly explain and understand another person’s specific motives as an individual.
In addition, the explanation which is backed up by the GH Mead evaluates how not only symbolic interactions occur when interacting with other people in society and their personal actions, but it is other important symbols each individual should clarify. For example the aspect of ‘Looking Glass Self’ which is mainly put forward by the theorist Charles Cooley which outlines how an individual gets their aspirations by looking at their self concept which allows them to stable themselves within societies means and conduct. Furthermore the other theory which is within the whole concept of the Chicago school policies was the ‘labelling theory’ this can be seen by many theorists as the factor which triggered many people’s barriers i.e. skills to further develop themselves. As for example when a teacher labels a student as ‘dumb’ this label will initially make them fulfil the teachers prophecy making them loss the self-esteem needed to gain success and achieve within education, however this theory as also becoming a debating issue which many sociologists argue for example Max Weber which outlines how some people do achieve although they have been placed in a low-ranking. However, he mainly clarifies how the labelling theory mainly helps the ruling class rather than the working class. As studies have shown that teachers are mainly considered to be helping the middle class children as they in the teachers eyes are nurtured into succeeding as they have the right equipment and resources needed to succeed in education whereas the working class children lack the right resources needed helping them to develop and contrast within education life while at school.
In addition, the Chicago School which also puts forward the factor ‘Career’ also affects an individuals surroundings of social action theories within society. As the concept but forward by GH Mead also again highlights how careers especially are divided into sub-categories which can even be manual work or non-manual work, however he clarifies how the working class especially are the ones who are ranked with the most money and value with the higher professional occupations compared to the…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of Families and Households

...Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households. Functionalism is a macro approach to society. It is based on a consensus that society as whole is run by and for the benefit of all its members. Early Functionalists such as Durkheim believed that society is made up of many institutions which work together to function. Regarding families, Functionalists believe that the nuclear family is best for society. Functionalists look at what the functions the family performs and they therefore say that the nuclear family is best for society. For example functionalists believe that traditional domestic roles (for the male to play an instrumental role as the breadwinner and the female to do the dual-burden) are necessary to ensure that children are socialised correctly with both male and female role models. Functionalists believe that the nuclear family is perfect for bringing up a geographically mobile workforce which allows families to move about for work easily, for example Functionalists believe during the industrial revolution nuclear families became more common as it was easier for families to move to an urban area in search of work than if it was for example an extended family. Conflict theories such as Marxism and Feminism challenge the Functionalism and the consensus of society by taking a more critical view. Social historians such as Laslett and Anderson also criticize the functionalist view of a ‘Functional Fit’ in the family. The......

Words: 3354 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalists to Our Understanding of Families and Households

...Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households. (29 marks) Functionalists believe that society is based on a value consensus into which society socialises its members. This enables them to cooperate harmoniously to meet society’s needs and achieve shared goals. However, other sociologists argue that contemporary society is not harmonious but is ridden with conflicts. Functionalists regard society as a system made up of different sub-systems that depend on each other, such as the family, education, religion, law and the mass media. Family and other sub-systems are often compared to the human body where if one of the body parts doesn’t function properly the others won’t either. Social structures work for you and society as a whole so if one doesn’t work correctly society will break up. Functionalists are interested in the positive functions of the family and how it contributes to a healthy society. Conversely, functionalists don’t look at society negatively or the negative effects family could have on you or society as whole. Also, Marxists see societies institutions as helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism therefore, the functions of the family are purely performed for the benefit of the capital system and do not help society function properly, they don’t work for you and society as a whole, they are only there for the bourgeoisie. Murdock (1949) argued that all families fulfil four vital functions and without this......

Words: 990 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assess the Usefulness of Social Action Theories in the Study of Society (33 Marks)

...Social action theories are known as micro theories which take a bottom-up approach to studying society; they look at how individuals within society interact with each other. There are many forms of social action theories, the main ones being symbolic interactionism, phenomenology and ethnomethodology. They are all based on the work of Max Weber, a sociologist, who acknowledged that structural factors can shape our behaviour but individuals do have reasons for their actions. He used this to explain why people behave in the way in which they do within society. Weber saw four types of actions which are commonly committed within society; rational, this includes logical plans which are used to achieve goals, traditional-customary behaviour, this is behaviour which is traditional and has always been done; he also saw affectual actions, this includes an emotion associated with an action and value-rational actions, this is behaviour which is seen as logical by an individual. Weber’s discovery of these actions can therefore be seen as useful in the study of society. Weber discovered these actions by using his concept of verstehan, a deeper understanding. However, some sociologists have criticised him as they argue that verstehan cannot be accomplished as it is not possible to see thing in the way that others see them, leaving sociologists to question whether Weber’s social action theory is useful in the study of society. Social action theories have also been referred to as......

Words: 759 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Assess the Usefulness of Micro Sociology to Our Understanding of Society

...Assess the usefulness of micro sociology to our understanding of society (33marks) Micro sociology focuses on the actions and interactions of individuals and is a bottom-up approach. Such micro approaches, see society as shaped by its members, who possess agency, in other words, the ability to act as free agents. Micro approaches, also known as action theories, include social action theory, symbolic interactionism, phenomenology and ethnomethodoly. However, macro sociologists take a deterministic approach, as they believe that our actions are determined by society. Macro theories include Functionalism and Marxism, who see individuals as puppets, under the control of social structures. One micro approach to sociology is Weber’s social action theory. According to Weber, in order to understand human behaviour, we must take into account both the level of structural cause, and the level of subjective meaning that individuals attach to their actions. Weber argues that there are an infinite number of subjective meanings that actors give to their actions; however he attempts to classify actions into four types. Instrumentally rational action refers to action that is driven by a given goal, in order to achieve through the most efficient means. Value rational action involves action towards a goal that the actor regards as desirable, for example worshipping god in order to get to heaven. Unlike instrumentally rational action, there is no way of calculating whether the means of......

Words: 1093 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Feminist Perspectives to Our Understanding of Society

...Assess the contribution of feminist perspectives to our understanding of society. (33 marks) Feminism is a set of ideologies used to advance the cause of women’s equality and to end the sexist theory and practice of social oppression. It is a structuralist theory which is made up of several versions, but they all argue that society is patriarchal. The types of feminism I will be reviewing are liberal feminism, radical feminism, marxist feminism, and difference feminism. Aside from all agreeing that society is patriarchal, these versions of feminism disagree on two levels; the extent of patriarchy in society and also what needs to be done to create gender equality. Firstly, liberal feminism. Liberal feminists believe all humans should be treated equally; however they believe that women aren’t treated equally to men in society. Liberal feminists suggest that to create greater gender equality laws that are unfavourable to women need to be changed in order to present women with greater opportunities. Oakley distinguishes between sex and gender, referring to sex as the biological differences between males and females such as their reproductive role, whereas she refers to gender as culturally constructed differences between masculine and feminine roles and identities assigned to males and females. Liberal feminists therefore disagree with the functionalist Parsons who believed that males and females perform the roles they are biologically suited to do, contrarily......

Words: 912 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Marxism to Our Understanding of Society (33 Marks)

...Assess the contribution of Marxism to our understanding of society (33 marks) - June'13 A popular group of sociologists , who have conducted various amounts of research in regard to society, are Marxists, who believe that power in society is largely stemmed from wealth, which has created a capitalist society (a society in which people are employed for wages, and businesses are set up with the aim of making profit). In capitalism the working-class employees (proletarian) are exploited by the bourgeoisie (the ruling-class), because they were not paid the full value of their work since the bourgeoisie kept surplus value. According to Marxism, family developed so that men were able to feel certain of the paternity of their children. Engels (Marxist) believes that marriage would allow men to control women's sexuality and minimise the chances of women having an affair. This is supported by Murdock (Functionalist) who believes there are 4 functions to the family, one being the sexual function, which states that family prevents disruption to society by limiting sexuality to monogamous relationships, therefore preventing any conflict that may arise from sexual desire. This suggests that Marxists believe that society created the idea of family in order for men to feel confident they are passing down their property to their biological offspring. In addition, Marxist Feminists believe that society is controlled by men and the ruling-class; and that family encourages the......

Words: 1266 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of Soicety

...Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of society. (33) Functionalism is a consensus theory. It sees society as based on agreement among people about values, goals and rules in society. The job of the family is primary socialization. The family introduces norms and values to children, who carry these on to later years, where they are reinforced by religion and education. These norms and values allow people to move up the social hierarchy. For example, children are taught to conform by the family and education, which allows them to conform to the rules of wider society and become aware of what, is socially acceptable. Education also trains by teaching the skills needed for later life, for example punctuality, and interview skills. Unlike conflict structuralism, functionalists believe that society is based on merit, and those who work the hardest will be the ones to make it to the top, ensuring jobs are filled by those most capable, with the required skills. Those who don't work, will stay at the bottom of the hierarchy, and carry out the more menial, but equally essential jobs. In sociological research, functional prerequisites are the basic needs (food, shelter, clothing, and money) that an individual requires to live above the poverty line. Functional prerequisites may also refer to the factors that allow a society to maintain social order. A key functionalist is Talcott Parsons; he saw society as working like a human body, arguing that......

Words: 551 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to an Understanding of Society.

...Assess the contribution of functionalism to an understanding of society Functionalism is a macro, structural theory. It focuses on the needs of the social system as a whole and how these needs shape all the main features of society. It is a consensus theory being as it sees society as based on a basic consensus or agreement among its members about values, goals and rules. However because of this understanding of the functionalist theory I believe it has a generally weak contribution to the understanding of society. Because it is a macro theory it doesn’t look at the small groups or individuals in society and thus can miss very important factors. Also because it is a consensus theory it doesn’t look at the inequalities that Marxists look at, such as exploitation and the conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. It can be argued that functionalist only look at the bright side of society and doesn’t focuses on the bigger problems and issues it faces. Functionalists describe society as an organic analogy. Parsons also argues that social order is achieved through the existence of a shared culture or a central value system. He believes that cultures provide a framework that allows individuals to cooperate by laying down rules about how they should behave and what others may expect of them. Social order is only possible if members of society agree on these norms and values. The function of the value consensus is therefore to make social order possible, it does...

Words: 566 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Postmodernism to Sociologists Understanding of Crime and Deviance in Todays Society.

...Asses the contribution of postmodernism to sociologists understanding of crime and deviance in todays society. Some sociologists believe that we now live in a post-modern society that has a distinct set of characteristics in comparison to modern society; Postmodernists reject the views of the modernist theorists as they claim that they are metanarratives (big stories). They believe that sociology needs to develop new theories so we can fully understand postmodern society, as society is constantly changing it is marked with uncertainty and therefore society is split into a variety of groups. This essay will discuss the changes that have taken place in postmodern society and how this impacts upon our understanding of crime and deviance. Postmodernity has brought changes from modernity these changes include independence and choice. There is less focus on science, postmodernists reject scientific research methods in their research therefore postmodernists are criticised for being subjective. Lyotard argues that society is expanding due to the economic and scientific growth, knowledge is no longer a tool of the authorities, and we now have choice and freedom to believe what we want. Whereas Baudrillard argued that we are isolated and knowledge is filtered through businesses such as the media. We pursue the images attached to products; we now live in hyper-realities in which appearances are everything. This has lead to ‘death of the social’ which is a breakdown in social......

Words: 1010 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Assess the Usefulness of These Theories in Our Understanding of Society

...Assess the usefulness of these theories in our understanding of society. (20 marks) In this essay I will be writing about how useful macro and micro theories are in our understanding of society. Macro theories are explanations that look at society as a whole, and the effect society has on people within it. In academics, macro theories attempt to explain the entirety of a subject in general or broad terms and example of a macro theory is Marxism. Micro theories are explanations that look at individuals how they act and interact with others, and how they make sense on the world. Micro theories also focus in detail on more specific elements of the discipline. An example of a macro theory is Feminism which was first introduced by the Suffragettes which was solely focused on political equality and then brought light to the topic in 1918, when women were given the right to vote if they owned their own house and were over the age of 30, shockingly it took another 10 years for the age to lower to vote to 21. They focused on the gender division between men and women. Feminists characterise our society as patriarchal, which means male dominated, and they argue that mainstream sociology focus on the concern of men and not on the concern of women. There are many elements within feminist attitudes and this incudes Marxism feminists. Liberal feminists, Radical feminists and Black feminists all have a similar goal which is to end male patriarchy in society and free society of exploitation...

Words: 652 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalist Sociologists to Our Understanding of the Family

...item 2b and elsewhere, assess the contribution of functionalist sociologists to our understanding of the family Functionalists believe that everyone has a role to play in society in order for it to work effectively. Not only does the family have practical uses like reproduction and primary socialisation, but also things that personally benefit each member of family like economic provision. Each individual has a different belief on the importance of family and how it impacts our lives; however, I think functionalism only covers the basic understanding of family and how we are impacted by our own. One functionalist who has a theory regarding family is George Murdock, who published his research in 1949. Murdock believe there are four functions to a family: sexual, reproductive, economic and educational. The sexual function is for the married parents. In order to stay together and uphold the traditional happy family, they enjoy a healthy sex life to prevent affairs and unhappiness within the marriage. This is important as it ensures the children of the couple are raised by their biological parents. The economic function is the means of the man going off to work in order to provide food and shelter for the rest of the family. Education is the primary socialisation of the children, they will have the expected norms and values of moral people, helping them to fit into society as they grow older. This ‘education’ will also help them learn their place in society, and so as they go......

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assess the Usefulness of Feminist Contributions to Our Understanding of Society Today (33 Marks)

...Feminism is a conflict theory that sees religion as an instrument of patriarchy - a set of beliefs and practices responsible for women’s subordination. There are different types of feminism and the types I will be evaluating in this essay are Liberal, Radical, Marxist and Difference/poststructuralist feminist. Feminists criticise mainstream sociology for being ‘malestream’. By contrast, feminists examine society from the viewpoint of women, they see their work as part of the struggle against women’s subordination. However, although all feminists oppose women’s subordination, there are disagreements among feminist’s theories about its causes and how to overcome them. Liberal feminist are concerned with the human and civil rights and freedoms of the individual, they believe that all human beings should have equal rights. In liberal feminism, the concept of society changing itself to adapt to women does not occur. Liberal feminists insist that all that is needed to change the status of women is to change existing laws that are unfavourable for women and that will open up more opportunities for women to prove themselves as equal to the opposite sex. Oakley (1972) distinguishes between sex and gender. She claims sex differences are seen as fixed and gender differences vary between cultures and over time. Therefore what is considered a proper role for women in one society or at one time may be disapproved of or forbidden in another. Sexist attitudes and stereotypical beliefs......

Words: 1483 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Assess the Usefulness of Feminist Contributions to Our Understanding of Society Today (33 Marks)

...Feminists study society today through the viewpoint of oppressed women who are seen to be subordinated by men. Their main aim is to liberate women from men, patriarchal society and the socially constructed stereotypes of women. In order to do so, there are different strands of Feminism, which are, Liberal, the least extreme or violent, Marxist, who link in capitalism to Feminism and Radical Feminists, the most extreme. These groups seek to bring about equality through different means and on different levels of severity. In addition to these, there are smaller and more modern groups of Feminism which are Dual Systems Feminists, who are similar to Marxist Feminists and Poststructuralists who believe other Feminists disregard differences between women. Liberal Feminists are concerned with the human civil rights, therefore they seek legal reforms and changes in attitudes and socialisation to bring about gender equality, which does not require a violent revolution. They are the closest Feminist theory to a consensus view on today’s society even though it focuses on the conflicts between men and women. Liberal Feminists reject the idea that biological differences make women less competent or rational than men or vice versa. They distinguish between sex and gender; whereby sex refers to the biological differences such as their reproductive role and physical differences and gender refers to culturally constructed differences between ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ roles. As gender is......

Words: 1397 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Marxism to Our Understanding of Society (33marks)

...0 8 Assess the contribution of Marxism to our understanding of society. (33 marks) Marxism is a conflict theory which was developed by Karl Marx. It is a structural approach to society, meaning that it looks at the large-scale societal structure in order to see how society functions and operates. They believe that structure is categorized into two kinds of structure; the infrastructure and the superstructure. The superstructure is the culture, institutions, political power structures, roles, rituals, and norms that influence how we behave in society. The infrastructure means the basic systems and structures that a country or an organization needs in order to work properly. Marxism is useful to our understanding of society as it shows us how society is based on capitalism which caused the division of two opposed classes. Marx believed that in society we have two main classes; the bourgeoisie or the ruling class and the proletariat or the working class. The bourgeoisie are the owners of the means of production (factories e.g.). Marx argues that the bourgeoisie’s ownership of the means of production also gives them ideological and political power that they to exploit the proletariat. The proletariat are the working class in capitalist society. They own no means of production and are wage slaves who are forced to sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order for them to survive. The bourgeoisie construct the......

Words: 1320 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Feminist Perspectives to Our Understanding of Society (33 Marks)

...Assess the contribution of feminist perspectives to our understanding of society (33 marks) Feminists see society as patriarchal. They seek to describe, explain and change the position of women within society. The first ‘wave’ of feminism appeared in the late 19th century with the suffragette’s campaign for the right for women to vote. Even though all feminists oppose women’s subordination, there are disagreements on its causes and how to overcome it. Liberal or reformist feminists believe that traditional prejudices and stereotypes about gender differences are a barrier to equality. They believe all human beings should have equal rights. Since both men and women are human beings, both should have the same opportunities. Liberal Feminists argue that laws and policies against sex discrimination in employment and education can secure equal opportunities for women. Campaigning for changes in law can bring about change and we can bring about change through a cultural shift within society. They reject the idea that biological differences make women less competent or rational than men or that men are biologically less emotional or nurturing than women. To bring about change we must shift society’s socialisation patterns. For example society must seek to promote appropriate role models in education and the family by doing this we will benefit from a cultural shift and gender equality will become the norm. Liberal Feminists believe that changes in socialisation and culture are......

Words: 1744 - Pages: 7