Premium Essay

Arundel Partners Case Analysis

In: Other Topics

Submitted By hye30
Words 277
Pages 2
Arundel Partners Case Analysis

Executive Summary:

A group of investors (Arundel group) is looking into the idea of purchasing the sequel rights associated with films produced by one or more major movie studios. Movie rights are to be purchased prior to films being made. Arundel wants to come up with a decision to either purchase all the sequel rights for a studio's entire production during a specified period of time or purchase a specified number of major films. Arundel's profitability is dependent upon the price it pays for a portfolio of sequel rights. Our analysis of Arundel's proposal includes a net present value calculation of each movie production company. In order to decide whether Arundel can make money buying movie sequel rights depends on whether the net present value of the production company's movies is higher than the estimated 2M per film required to purchase the rights.

Problem Identification:

How are the principals of Arundel Partners planning to make money by buying rights to sequels? They would be interested in purchasing the sequel rights for one or more studios¡¦ entire production over an extended period of not less than a year. If a particular film was a hit, and Arundel thought a sequel would be profitable, it would exercise its rights by producing the sequel. Alternatively, they can sell the rights to the highest bidder. Inevitably, the performance of the original films would not justify sequels, and for them the sequel rights would simply not be exercised. For most movies it becomes quite clear after their first few weeks in theaters whether a sequel would be economical or not, based upon each film's box office…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Arundel Partners

...Arundel Partners: The Sequel Project Question 1: Arundel Partners thinks they can make money by buying the rights to sequels because of the possible arbitrage opportunity between the price they would pay for an option to sequels and the sequels’ real value. Therefore, valuing the option correctly takes great importance. The partners want to buy a portfolio of rights in advance rather than negotiating film-by-film to buy them because it is of critical importance to Arundel that a number of films and a price per film are agreed upon before either Arundel or the studio knows which films would generate the option of a sequel. If not, once production starts the studio would inevitably have more information on the likeliness that a sequel would be possible. This would put Arundel at a disadvantage, because they would then have to negotiate the price for sequel rights on each film produced while knowing much less than the production studio about the film. For example, if the studio knew that obtaining the rights for the literary work the first movie is based upon took a lot of haggling and work, and that the script has gone through fifteen revisions with six different writers, then the studio may be keen to get rid of the sequel rights. While a film’s profitability is always a gamble, there are often early signs such as these that a movie is going to be a jumbled mess that cost the studio way too much money to produce in the first place. These films tend to......

Words: 1483 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Arundel : Options Case

...Arundel Partners – The Sequels Project After evaluation of the proposed acquisition of the movie sequel rights, we recommend to offer movie studios as a per-movie price to purchase the sequel rights for their entire portfolio of movies the studios are going to produce over the next year.  Arundel should make an offer to buy sequel rights as the average NPV (on a per film basis ) is $5.51 mn (this is the value calculated using real options method). Hence, we should pay a price below $5.51mn. As per informal inquiries made by us, the studios would be tempted to accept the price of $2mn or more and would not even consider a price below $1mn. We propose that we should negotiate for the price of $2mn. This would give us a profit of $3.51 mn per film. The movie studio might (or might not) be willing to sell these rights at this price because it helps the studios mitigate the risk associated with producing the sequel. Also, the fact that there is no liquid market for rights to produce sequels will also drive the price lower on account of lack of demand. Average value of Sequel rights per film using DCF Analysis Average value of sequel rights per film across all studios 1. There are 99 films in the portfolio. Arundel Partners will only produce films for which hypothetical NPV is greater than zero. Hence, we calculate NPV of each film at Year 0. Since the exhibits state that the values are already preset values, we have not rediscounted them. NPV (At year 0)...

Words: 1681 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Partners Healthcare Case Analysis

...Partners Healthcare Case Analysis  FIN 4504: Professor Yue Tang    Group Members  Brittany Cyb  Jessica Berman  Mary Austin    1. a) Efficient Portfolios (see excel snapshot below)          Acquired the Portfolio Variance Using Solver Below:      Applied this Solver from 5% to 17%,  changing the parameters accordingly from  B through N as the expected return  (constraint) changed.        1. b)  Global Minimum Variance Portfolio (see excel snapshot below)                Acquired Global Minimum Variance Portfolio Using Solver below:    Applied similar parameters as  # 1a but changed the cells and  deleted the minimum  expected return constraint        1.c) The Tangent Portfolio (see excel snapshot below)          Acquired the Tangent Portfolio using Solver Below:    Changed parameter from min to  max and applied a similar  constraint as #1b but chose the  Sharpe Ratio as the target          2. What amount should hospital invest in each asset? What is the standard  deviation?    Step 1) Inserted expected return of both STP and optimal expected return of  LTP into an equation to equal the desired 8% return to find the  weights.      .08 = w(.032) + (1‐w)(.1177)      w = .44    Step 2) Solve for weights of STP and LTP assets      W (Total STP) = .44    W (Total LTP) = .56           W (U.S. Equity) = .56 (.41) = .23    W (Foreign Equity) = .56 (.47) = .26    W (Bonds) = .56 (.12) = .07   ......

Words: 488 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Partners Healthcare Case Study

...Partners HealthCare System (PHS): Transforming Health Care Services Delivery through Information Management Case Description According to government sources, U.S. expenditures on health care in 2009 reached nearly $2.4 trillion dollars ($2.7 trillion by the end of 2010). Despite this vaunting national level of expenditure on medical treatment, death rates due to preventable errors in the delivery of health services rose to approximately 98,000 deaths in 2009. To address the dual challenges of cost control and quality improvement, some have argued that what is needed is an integrated electronic medical record (EMR) system and associated information technology-enabled processes. While the information systems currently available may meet the needs of the industry, the question remains as to what is required within and by the health care services organization to achieve a satisfactory response to these dual challenges. At the present time, Partners Healthcare System (PHS) maintains a centralized digital records library on over 5 million patients, augmented in real-time by data, textual comments, and artifacts (i.e. x-rays, MRI’s, EKG’s, etc.) as these patients visit doctor offices, receive hospital-based or home care services, and obtained prescription medications and other therapies. Procedures are in place to ensure the data quality and integrity of these patient files. Going forward, any health care professional across the network can access a patient’s complete...

Words: 2178 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Singhania & Partner Case Study Report

...CASE ANALYSIS People Management – Singhania & Partners Group D1 Ankit Agarwal Kausik.R Meenu Rajpal Pramod Khandelwal Syed Reza Salis Naqvi Objective of the Analysis 1. How can Singhania and Partners sustain the effectiveness of people management policies with increasing competition? I think the CEO is worried about what they pay rather than the HR policies per se. Be more specific PESTC Analysis  Political and Legal:       Economic liberalization by the government of India. LPG (liberalization, privatization and globalization) by GOI gave a fillip to foreign investment and subsequently, legal services industry. Foreign law firms are not allowed to set shops in India or practice Indian law. Imminent liberalization of legal service industry which will increase competition. Law firms were prohibited to directly market their services. Legal system was very slow.  Economic:       High growth market for legal services. Availability of highly skilled capital at competitive prices. Growth of LPO (legal process outsourcing) industry providing a boost to legal services. Huge market for legal services in the US accounting for 49% of the global industry. Arbitration opportunities in India provided a market for legal services. Growth in the IT and infrastructure sector giving a fillip to legal services.  Social:  Lack of educational and vocational opportunities for the people to develop their career in legal services industry.  Inclination of......

Words: 2138 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Arundel Partners

...Arundel Partners Diageo plc Main focus of the case is to recommend a capital structure policy for the organization and develop a tradeoff between tax benefits of higher debts and cost of financial distress. Case provides details about the business model comprising of four divisions and history of the company. It also says firm is planning to divest noncore operations and consolidate the core business of beverage alcohol to reduce expense and increase synergy. Most Importantly, Case includes the key elements of business model and capital structure that have the potential of impacting financial strategy in following ways:- High Interest Coverage and Future Strategy As per the case, Diageo has interest coverage of 5x which is higher than interest coverage value of 4.2x, at which total of taxes paid and distress costs is the least as shown in Diageo’s Monte-Carlo simulation (shown below). Also, in the below simulation, its interest coverage ration should lie in the range of 5x to 3.6x to have optimal coverage. Diageo future strategy is based on organic and inorganic expansion. Under inorganic growth scenario, Diageo needs $6 to $8 billion to acquire other players in the market. To finance these acquisitions, Diageo would raise additional debt from the market. To make this strategy effective, Diageo has to keep very low cost of borrowing, which can only be achieved by keeping high interest coverage ratio and credit rating in the investment grade range. This explains the Diageo’s......

Words: 329 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Partners Healtcare Case Question to Help Solving the Case

...Portfolio Theory Case (Professor David Moreno) PARTNERS HEALTHCARE CASE The goal of this case is to teach to students the relevance of non traditional assets (as real states or commodities) in a well-diversified portfolio. Moreover, students will be able to practice with the most important concepts from portfolio theory as efficient frontier, dominated portfolios, Sharpe ratio, among others. In addition, students are learning how portfolio theory can be useful not only for portfolio managers but for any company or firm with some funds to manage. To do this case students must work in groups and, at the end, each group must give a printed copy of the answers to all these questions. Moreover, they should prepare a presentation in Power Point or Word answering these questions for their presentation on the classroom. Short Questions (You should answer these questions very shortly) 1. How do the hospitals obtain their profits? Why do the hospitals use or need the Long-Term Funds? Compute the annual returns obtained by the LTP between 1995 and 2004 and represent them on a graph. In addition, what has the average return been during that time period? 2. According to the text the physician organizations or hospitals can invest their financial resources in several centrally-managed pools. What are these pools? How are they? 1 Portfolio Theory Case (Professor David Moreno) 3. The problem presented in the case is a typical problem of portfolio theory. Is it a security selection......

Words: 605 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Partners Healthcare Case Solution

...Partners Healthcare Executive Summary Partners Healthcare is considering the introduction of real assets into the organization’s portfolio. The analysis will demonstrate the effects of having one risky asset and one risk-free asset in a portfolio. Our analysis will also show that the introduction of real assets can decrease the risk of the hospital’s portfolio. Each hospital in the healthcare system can determine the appropriate portfolio mix based on their desired expected level of return and risk they are willing to accept. I. Mixes of STP & LTP Suppose different hospitals within the Partners system chose different mixes of the “risk-free” STP (short term pool) and the baseline LTP (long term pool), whose future expected returns and risks are shown in Exhibit 3. On Exhibit 3, plot the returns and risks of the various potential portfolios that can be formed by allocating funds between the STP and baseline LTP. What shape does a line drawn through these portfolios take? Why? In contrast, what would the risk-return opportunities available to the hospitals be if they could invest only in the STP and US Equities? Exhibit 1a plots the expected returns for the mix of portfolios with the “risk-free” STP and the baseline LTP. A straight line can be drawn through these portfolios as the expected return and standard deviation (i.e. volatility) increases with the greater weight allocation to the LTP. The straight line is observed due to these portfolios being...

Words: 1319 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Arundel Partners

...DUISENBERG SCHOOL OF FINANCE MSc FINANCE Corporate Finance and Banking Arundel Partners: The Sequel Project The East Wind Amol Marathe 140843 Linglan Tan 140838 Xiangyu Zhou 140912 Date: 20/11/2014 Arundel Partners: The Sequel Project The East Wind Executive Summary: Arundel group is looking into the project of purchasing the sequel rights associated with films produced by one or more major movie studios in United States. Arundel believes that they can calculate a value for the rights to produce these sequels and take a position by investing in a portfolio conformed of these rights. Arundel Partners plans to make money by negotiating an option price below its net present value calculation and obtaining its expected returns on the option. The proposal is appealing to studios because sales of sequel rights can help them finance initial production, If particular movie becomes a sequel then the value of the option will increase and Arundel will either exercise the right to make the sequel or sell the right either to the original studio or a third party willing to take on the project. The principals at Arundel Partners are inclined to buy a portfolio of all these sequel rights rather than individual films given that Arundel wants to avoid buying the rights of movies that are not expected to perform well. Movie rights are supposed to be purchased prior to films being made. Arundel wants to come up with a decision to either purchase all the sequel rights for a......

Words: 3629 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Case Analysis

...Case analysis:- Skim the case:-read it twice What is required of me and what is my role? Consultant of AL What is the main issue and why is it important to the organization? Fraud and mismanagement Why has the issue arisen, and why now?because al left the co. in middle to complete his studies When does the issue need to be decided? How should I allocate my time on this case? 2. Read the case closely. How do the exhibits fit the case? Which ones are relevant, and which ones are not? What industry does the organization operate in? mortgage business What is the state of the economy?Economy is doing well. What information do I have on competitive factors that are important to my analysis? What are the key organizational factors? (What is the reporting structure, and what are the organization’s goals and objectives? What principles, rules, or values, if any, are at issue? What are the organization’s planning and control systems? Are there any incentive systems that might affec behaviour? Which business functions are critical to success or failure?) Who are the affected stakeholders (investors, employees, managers, customers, suppliers, and members of the public or community)? What are their interests and what motivates them? Who are the readers of any reports that I might prepare? What decisions will be made based on my report? Notes in the case:- Trusted employees to run the business. AL started the co. in 2002 with $40,000. Initially co. was doing well......

Words: 995 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Solutions to Arundel Partners Case

...solutions to arundel partners case http://www.justanswer.com/law/0vnrc-solutions-arundel-partners-case.html Executive Summary:  A group of investors (Arundel group) is looking into the idea of purchasing the sequel rights associated with films produced by one or more major movie studios. Movie rights are to be purchased prior to films being made. Arundel wants to come up with a decision to either purchase all the sequel rights for a studio's entire production during a specified period of time or purchase a specified number of major films. Arundel's profitability is dependent upon the price it pays for a portfolio of sequel rights. Our analysis of Arundel's proposal includes a net present value calculation of each movie production company. In order to decide whether Arundel can make money buying movie sequel rights depends on whether the net present value of the production company's movies is higher than the estimated 2M per film required to purchase the rights.  Problem Identification:  How are the principals of Arundel Partners planning to make money by buying rights to sequels? They would be interested in purchasing the sequel rights for one or more studios¡¦ entire production over an extended period of not less than a year. If a particular film was a hit, and Arundel thought a sequel would be profitable, it would exercise its rights by producing the sequel. Alternatively, they can sell the rights to the highest bidder. Inevitably, the performance of the......

Words: 1450 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Arundel Partners Case

...Arundel Partners: The Sequel Project 1. Why do the principals of Arundel Partners think they can make profits buying movie sequel rights? They would be interested in purchasing the sequel rights for one or more studios¡¦ entire production over an extended period of not less than a year. If a particular film was a hit, and Arundel thought a sequel would be profitable, it would exercise its rights by producing the sequel. Alternatively, they can sell the rights to the highest bidder. Inevitably, the performance of the original films would not justify sequels, and for them the sequel rights would simply not be exercised. For most movies it becomes quite clear after their first few weeks in theaters whether a sequel would be economical or not, based upon each film's box office performance. 2. Why do they want to buy a portfolio of rights in advance rather than negotiating film-by-film? It is of critical importance to Arundel that a number of films and a price per film is agreed upon before either Arundel or the studio knew which films would generate the option of a sequel. In addition, once production started, the studio would inevitably form an opinion about the movie and the likeliness that a sequel would be possible. This would put Arundel at a disadvantage, because they would then have to negotiate the price for sequel rights on each film produced, while knowing much less than the production studio about the film. 3. Estimate the per-film value of a portfolio of......

Words: 390 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Arundel Case

... Read and study CH 17 from McDonald: “Real Options” 3. Read and study CH33 from Hull: “Real Options” 4. Case: Arundel Partners: The Sequel Project Answer the following questions: a. What makes Arundel think it can make money by buying a package of sequel rights? Is the profit opportunity, if it exists, likely to be sustainable? Arundel can make money selling the rights to a higher bid. Another option to make money is by producing the sequel exercising its rights but this will depend on if the net present value of the production movies is higher than the amount of buying the rights. If the future positive cashflows are undervalued Arundel can seek an arbitrage opportunity and buy the rights at the market price. b. Why would the studios be interested in raising money in this fashion? Why not raise the money in more traditional ways? The studio can not raise money in a traditional way because they don´t know when the movie will be popular o not so they don’t have regular cashflows. They also think that the business of movies production can be profitable by selling sequel rights ( this can be perform as an option). If a movie performs with positive cashflows they can invest in the movie production and have profits. The risk here is lower because they don´t have the same risk than the traditional ways of raise money like an asset. c. Why should Arundel pay anything for the sequel rights? The average movie loses money, and a sequel is more costly and has......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arundel

...Case 5: Arundel Partners Prepare a memo addressing the following questions: 1. Explain why Arundel Partners is interested in purchasing the rights to make sequels of all of the studios movies, rather than just some. Why do they believe this venture is profitable? 2. Suppose that you are a movie executive. You are considering a movie version of the life of President Garfield in the months leading up to his assassination by Charles Guiteau in a Washington DC railroad station in 1881. Your analysts have determined that the expected revenues are $94,556,250. They determine that revenues will be distributed binomially as shown in Exhibit 1 (40% annual volatility). Exhibit 1 shows the possible payoffs and the probability of each state occurring (note this information is provided in an Excel file). Assume that the one-year T-Bill rate is 5% (yield with semiannual compounding). If given the green light, the movie will have the following costs: a. $36MM – Negative Costs (assume it is incurred immediately) b. $25MM – Distribution Fees (assume these are paid in one year) c. $32MM – Distribution Expenses (assume these are paid in one year). Should you accept this project? Why? Suppose that Arundel Partners will give you a $2MM check for the rights to the sequel. Do you accept the project? 3. Suppose you come upon another project with exactly the same costs and possible payoffs. However, this film is a movie version of the popular 1960s television show Gilligan’s......

Words: 495 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Case Study: Partners Healthcare Systems

...Case Study: Partners HealthCare Systems Case Study: Partners HealthCare Systems Partners HealthCare is a non-profit, health system located in Boston that created a data based transformation (Davenport, 2013). It integrated a new system that aligned the participating organizations to cohesively run as one and to help shape the future of the organization. The system didn’t stop there as it was responsible for bettering the patient financing experience and the delivery of healthcare information to other organizations (Davenport, 2013). The initial goal of the organization was making patient care more affordable and accountable by providing integrated, evidence based, patient-oriented care. Problem Identified Partners HealthCare, which was created by major contributing hospitals and medical facilities in the Northeast, initially began as a way to focus on the patient needs; however, the company soon found themselves separating from their initial goal. There was more than one problem identified within the realms of the company. There are three main issues that this case study produced. The first outlying issue is called Alert/Warning Fatigue (Davenport, 2013). This derives from alerts that were placed in the system to warn doctors of notices that could be anything from mixing prescriptions to simple notifications that most doctors already knew or was not in their field of study. A second issue that requires resolution to create a successful working system is the......

Words: 1410 - Pages: 6