Premium Essay

Affirmatve Action and Title Vii

In: Business and Management

Submitted By JV1975
Words 323
Pages 2
Affirmative action was part of executive order 11246 which supports Title VII of the civil rights act of 1964 that renders discrimination illegal employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Affirmative action involves the employer brining qualified women and minorities into a workplace from which it has been determined that they are excluded in order to make the workplace more reflective of the population from which employees are drawn (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2007). Affirmative action is not only in place to just end discrimination but to actively seeking individuals for employment and promoting individuals within an organization who represent specific minority groups and/or women.
The Rights of White males are also protected if there is evidence of discrimination. For example, if a company institutes an affirmative action plan to correct an imbalance in their work force between men and women; once that imbalance has been corrected the plan should be discontinued. If not and the practice continues an employee who is a white male and is qualified for a position but is passed over by a female who is not as qualified as he is would have grounds for sex discrimination under Title VII.
Affirmative Action is not in place to institute quotas, quotas are prohibited. Affirmative action is in place to make sure that qualified woman or minorities are given equal opportunity for employment in whatever position they are applying or being promoted to. It is often mistaken for a law that says a company must hire an individual because she is a woman or she or he is a minority. If an individual is not qualified for a job there is no law that says you have to hire them just because of their status as a woman or minority.

Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, L. P. (2007). The Regulation of Discrimination in Employment (5th…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ethics - Title Vii

...position because of a discriminatory policy requiring employees to work rotating weekend shifts to include religious holy days. The company attorney has notified me that that the claim is against the company under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Constructive Discharge, after a work schedule policy change. A Constructive discharge is defined as follows: “Under the majority view, an employee who resigns after being subjected to unlawful discrimination is said to have been constructively discharged if a reasonable person would have found the discriminatory conditions to be intolerable. Under the minority view, the plaintiff must show not only that conditions were intolerable, but also that the employer created those conditions with the specific intent of forcing her to resign” (Finnegan, 1986). The employees Constructive Discharge is claimed in that the policy change to start rotating weekends was found intolerable to the employee due to religious holy days being a work requirement. The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 covers a variety of potential discriminations including discrimination on the basis of religion. Discrimination could be directed to a group or individuals. The employee could apply this claim under Title VII if they believe the policy change was made specifically to target people of faith, or them as an individual. The former employee would be compelled by the court to provide proof as such and that they were......

Words: 798 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Title Vii

...Human Resources: Constructive Discharge*   February 10, 2012   Memorandum # 1   From: Manager, Elementary Division   To: The CEO   Subject: Former Employee's Constructive Discharge Claim ______________________________________________________________________   Background: Our company attorney notified me about a former employee who filed a claim against the company citing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for constructive discharge.   Findings:   A. How is constructive discharge as a legal concept relevant to the scenario?   At the beginning of the New Year, we implemented a new shift policy to keep up with the company growth. We required employees in the production group to work 12-hour shifts with 4 days of work then 4 days off in a rotating shift, which means some of those working days fall into the employee’s religious holy day. The former employee quit after the implementation. This former employee is claiming a constructive discharge. Constructive discharge is one of the discriminatory practices wherein an employee is forced to resign because of perceived intolerable work environment and courts generally agree to the employee if they determine that a reasonable person would also feel same way if given the employee’s position (Dempsey, & Petsche, 2006). Also, courts usually require that the employee must show that the intolerable working condition with the intent of...

Words: 1465 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Title 5

...TITLE 5 Compensatory time off for religious observances. (a) These regulations are issued pursuant to title IV of Public Law 95-390, enacted September 29, 1978. Under the law and these regulations, an employee whose personal religious beliefs require the abstention from work during certain periods of time may elect to engage in overtime work for time lost for meeting those religious requirements. (b) To the extent that such modifications in work schedules do not interfere with the efficient accomplishment of an agency's mission, the agency shall in each instance afford the employee the opportunity to work compensatory overtime and shall in each instance grant compensatory time off to an employee requesting such time off for religious observances when the employee's personal religious beliefs require that the employee abstain from work during certain periods of the workday or workweek. (c) For the purpose stated in paragraph (b) of this section, the employee may work such compensatory overtime before or after the grant of compensatory time off. A grant of advanced compensatory time off should be repaid by the appropriate amount of compensatory overtime work within a reasonable amount of time. Compensatory overtime shall be credited to an employee on an hour for hour basis or authorized fractions thereof. Appropriate records will be kept of compensatory overtime earned and used. (d) The premium pay provisions for overtime work in subpart A of part 550 of title 5, Code of...

Words: 6497 - Pages: 26

Free Essay

Gregory Vii (Hildebrand)

...GREGORY VII (Hildebrand) (Pope, 1073-85). He was born in Tuscany about 1020, perhaps at Soana, a village of the southern border. His family belonged to the plebeian class. Although nothing of his remoter ancestry is known, his family name, Hildebrand, would imply a Teutonic descent; but by birth and education at least he was Italian. His youth was passed in Rome, in the monastery of St. Mary, on the Aventine, of which his uncle was abbot, and he probably took monastic vows. The Emperor Henry III took him to Germany, and he continued his studies in Cologne. Very likely he also visited Aix-la-Chapelle and Cluny. He attended the council at Worms at which Bishop Bruno of Toul was chosen Pope (Leo IX), and the latter took him to Rome (1049) and made him a cardinal subdeacon. He had great influence during the pontificate of Leo. On the latter's death (1054) the Roman people manifested a desire to have Hildebrand as successor; but this honor he declined, preferring to gain more experience. Besides important domestic employments which were assigned to him, he was sent as legate to the Council of Tours (1054), in which the cause of Berengarius was examined. (See BERFEGARIUS of TOURS.) He was likewise one of the three legates dispatched to Germany to consult about a successor to Leo IX. Under the four popes who followed Leo--Victor II, Stephen IX, Benedict X, and Alexander II, known in history as the German popes--Hildebrand continued to be the predominant. Power and inspired into......

Words: 1652 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Title Vii of the Civil Rights Act

...Title VII of the Civil Rights Act Abstract Title VII of the civil rights act was a hard won victory for civil rights activists and workers in 1964. In securing this act, they ended the decades of ‘separate but equal’ treatment that had been used as a justification for discrimination against black Americans, and wrote into law precedents that would affect change in the labor market undercurrents that subtly discriminated against women. The text of the Civil Rights Act made it unlawful for an employer to hire or discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his/her compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, because of an individual’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin. This act covers hiring, firing, promotions and all workplace conduct. “The history of the 1964 civil rights act, and the series of events through which the need for the act evolved, is the longstanding conflict between those who would make employment related decisions based on bigotry, and those who believe that our country stands for freedom for all peoples, regardless of race, color sex, or national origin. After the civil war, slaves were free, but still unable to participate in many American cultural events because of lack of education, or lingering discrimination. In 1920, the 19th amendment prohibited exclusion to the right to vote to all Americans based on racial or gender identity. In 1963, the equal pay act......

Words: 1188 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Affirmative Action

...Affirmative Action Marlene S. Smith MGT/434 October 28, 2013 Thomas Affirmative Action Affirmative action is an action that was purposefully designed to provide full and equal opportunities for employment and education for women, minorities, and other individuals belonging to disadvantaged groups. This paper will assess the rudiments of Affirmative Action as it applies to public and private sector employers. The paper will also evaluate what employers are subject to affirmative action plans, what the plans require employers to do, and what happens if employers do not meet the objectives of the affirmative action plan. Affirmative action has been around for many years. Fullinwinder (2009), “Affirmative action means positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in the areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded” (para. 1). When an employer uses preferential treatment to choose a candidate that the company should hire based on race, gender, or ethnicity affirmative action generates disagreement. Most individuals think issues that are mounted by affirmative action derive from the issue of race. Please remember that affirmative action does not apply to all employers. In fact affirmative action applies to organization or companies that employ 50 or more employees who have contracts with the federal government. These companies or organizations have to support the government with goods or......

Words: 1154 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Title Vii

...With the research I have uncovered with the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, along with other areas of more extensive discrimination suits that have been filed in the work force has really helped to understand that importance of compliance of the laws that are set in front of you as a manager, supervisor and/or a business owner. With a lot of people turning a blind eye to some of the smallest delegations when it comes to discrimination, that could be their biggest down fall as a business owner, as the smallest mistakes can turn out to be the most costly mistakes. You are going to learn more insight on race discrimination as this has really opened my eyes, with my past work experiences and to know what to expect in the future, also what to look for while in the job force. There is many different verification to the law of racial discrimination whether it is on an employee of employer level. It ranges from a fine, all the way to time punishable in prison. In most cases that I have researched it has been against an employee to an employer, and it has been settle in a monetary settlement. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of race and color, as well as national origin, sex, and religion. Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments. It also applies to employment agencies and to labor organizations, as well as to the federal......

Words: 2672 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Affirmatve Action

...Affirmative Action The intention of this paper is to make a real argument against the performance of affirmative action using logical arguments ethical theories, and perspectives. This paper will examine in what way a Utilitarian, Deontologist, Virtue Ethicist, Relativist and an Ethical Egoist would debate against the use of affirmative action. The case will be made by demonstrating why this practice is unquestionably unethical and discriminatory. Affirmative action is frequently used to give subgroups a benefit when applying for jobs, colleges or other organizations. In some cases, companies are financially incentivized to be racially diverse and in other instances extra points are given for test results. The result of these practices enables candidates, which could be less experienced to satisfy a position, to be chosen in order to achieve minority quotas. Affirmative action was passed to push back opposed to racism after segregation was viewed unlawful in order to get the government and employers to employ minorities; however, it is twisted by issues. In order to comprehend how an ethical perspective or theory would deal with affirmative action, it is necessary to first comprehend the view or approach. Utilitarianism is acknowledged as an important ethical theory, which only means that it centers on the expected result of an act, instead of the principles of the act itself or the agent involved in the action. The Utilitarian may endorse using the motto, “the ends......

Words: 2250 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Title Vii, Fifty Years Later

...Paper Title VII, Fifty Years Later Introduction July 2nd, 2014 will mark the fifty year anniversary of the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the act made workplace discrimination illegal. However, fifty years later we are still debating the issue and there is overwhelming evidence that discrimination in the workplace still exists. Alarmingly, workplace discrimination claims based on race filed at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have reached record highs within the last three years. In 2010 alone, there were 93,727 charges reported to the EEOC . This article will review current law regarding discrimination by employers. It will determine if these laws are effectively preventing or reducing discrimination in the workplace. Finally, this article will explore what changes, if any, should be made to the law. I. Relevant Law Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is intended to make illegal discrimination by an employer based on race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. Title VII applies to employers who have at least fifteen employees. Originally, the minimum was twenty-five employees until the Equal Opportunity Act of 1972 reduced the number to fifteen. The most recent modifier of Title VII is the Civil Rights Act of 1991 which kept the employee minimum at fifteen but allowed for monetary damage awards for victims of discrimination. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is in charge of enforcing Title......

Words: 1935 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Henry Vii

...Henry VII (before accession known as Henry Tudor, 2nd Earl of Richmond, Welsh: Harri Tudur; 28 January 1457 – 21 April 1509) was King of England, ruled the Principality of Wales (until 29 November 1489) and Lord of Ireland from his seizing the crown on 22 August 1485 until his death on 21 April 1509, as the first monarch of the House of Tudor. Henry won the throne when his forces defeated the forces of King Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth Field, the culmination of the Wars of the Roses. Henry was the last king of England to win his throne on the field of battle. He cemented his claim by marrying Elizabeth of York, daughter of Edward IV and niece of Richard III. Henry was successful in restoring the power and stability of the English monarchy after the political upheavals of the civil wars known as the Wars of the Roses. He founded the Tudor dynasty and, after a reign of nearly 24 years, was peacefully succeeded by his son, Henry VIII. Although Henry can be credited with the restoration of political stability in England, and a number of commendable administrative, economic and diplomatic initiatives, the latter part of his reign was characterised by a financial greed which stretched the bounds of legality. The capriciousness and lack of due process which indebted many in England were soon ended upon Henry VII's death after a commission revealed widespread abuses. According to the contemporary historian Polydore Vergil, simple "greed" in large part underscored the means...

Words: 267 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Henry Vii

...English army to defend Brittany. Henry strived to strengthen is position by forming an alliance with Maximilian. Maximilian had contracted a marriage-by-proxy with Anne, and had no desire fro the Duchy of Brittany to fall into the French hands. The army went to Brittany to support their freedom, but Anne had lost her motive, and reluctantly married Charles VIII. To make things worse for Henry, Perkin Warbeck was simultaneously trying to gain support from the French. Henry launched a late invasion on France in 1492, in which, the French reacted immediately by trying to sought a peace settlement. The Treaty of Etaples were signed in November 1492, in which Charles VIII agreed to withdraw his support for Perkin Warbeck, and pay a pension to Henry VII as a form of compensation. Despite there being a number of difficulties and knock-backs for Henry in his goal of protecting......

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Title Vii

...Title VII Regina Marshall HR590 Human Resource Management September 11, 2010 Title VII Many of us have worked in job environment that were less than ideal and probably thought about quitting our jobs on a daily basis. Do you ever wonder what it was like before the laws were written and implemented that prevented your boss from discriminating against you and other coworkers? Well I can without a doubt say that I would not have want a job before the 1964 Congress enacted the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Title VII was one of the major legislation that was a direct result of the civil rights movement in the 1960s. A famous civil rights leader by the name of Martin Luther King Jr. Was very instrumental in obtaining this act and he believed that everyone should be treated fairly and that minorities should not be given a job based upon the color of their skin. Congress must have agreed because in 1964 President Lyndon Johnson signed the legislation and the minorities all over the world began to get a fair shot in the employment industry. Title VII states that it is illegal for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or discharge an individual, or discriminate against him based upon his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This law also states that an employer can’t segregate or classify employees/applicants in any way that would deprive an individual of employment opportunities because of an individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or......

Words: 1019 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Affirmative Action

...Affirmative Action Sharon Huntington University of Phoenix MGT 434 Teresa Knox September 13, 2010 Affirmative Action According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “affirmative action means positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded” (Fullinwider, 2009). The following paragraphs will discuss what employers are subject to affirmative action plans, what employers are required to do under affirmative action plans, and what happens if employers do not meet the goals of the affirmative action plan. Affirmative Action Employers Not all employers are required to have an affirmative action plan. “Affirmative action regulations do not apply to everyone, but only to just over 20 percent of the workforce” (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2007, p. 184). The following types of employers are required to have affirmative action plans: • Federal contracts or subcontracts worth $10,000 or more • Or 50 or more employees and contracts worth $50,000 or more • Or are a construction contractor or subcontractor with a federal or federally assisted contract valued at more than $10,000 (The Employers Association, 2009). In addition to being required to have a written affirmative action plan, the above employers are also subject to compliance checks and reviews at the......

Words: 1082 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Title Vii

...Issue: Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 can an employee who is African American demonstrate that her employer discriminated against her by failing to promote her to the position of senior control buyer, where she has seven years of experience in the retail catalog business, two years as a control buyer, trained new buyers, received a special achievement award for contributing to the positive profile of the company and where the person who was hired in her place has no experience as a retail buyer in the private sector and has been with the company for six months? Brief Answer: A court is likely to rule that Mrs. Pitman has been discriminated against under Title VII. Mrs. Pitman is able to prove each of the four elements of the test set out in Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981). This test known as the McDonnell Douglass test is met when Mrs. Pitman shows that: (1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she applied and was qualified for the job; (3) despite her being qualified she was rejected; (4) after the rejection the position remained open and employer continued to seek applicannot s. Mrs. Pitman is also able to provide statistical evidence of discrimination and evidence of discriminatory attitudes. Facts: Our client, Jenna Pitman, is seeking to file suit against J. Montgomery for a claim of racial discrimination under Title VII. The allegation stems from a denial of Mrs. Pitman's application for a promotion by J.......

Words: 5593 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Title Vi

...Title VII is a very important part of legislation that was designed to prevent discrimination in the workplace; numerous amendments have been made to make the definitions easier to understand by clearly outlining inappropriate behaviors and actions. The following paragraphs will discuss the history of Title VII , the amendments, defining covered employees, disparate treatment, and sexual harassment. Policies that should be in effect in the workplace will also be discussed with the intent of further educating the readers. The History and Evolution of Title VII and its amendments (PDA, ADA, ADEA) Title VII was born out of the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1964 and has grown to become the laws that almost all businesses must comply with. Title VII states that "it shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex or national origin.” This title also makes it unlawful to "limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin" (Bennett-Alexander and Hartman, 2007). Title VII gave new......

Words: 2066 - Pages: 9