Free Essay


In: Other Topics

Submitted By ajmunoz1987
Words 671
Pages 3
Saturday has come and gone, meaning the majority of free agents who signed with new teams over the summer are now trade-eligible. Last week, Grantland took a look at some of the bigger names on that December 15 eligibility list, including Ryan Anderson and Jeremy Lin, but a few other players merit some follow-up now that the deadline has passed. Here's the rundown:
Los Angeles Clippers
The Clippers have a bunch of mid- and low-salaried players who can now be included in deals: Matt Barnes, Grant Hill, Jamal Crawford, Ronny Turiaf, Ryan Hollins, and Willie Green. Chauncey Billups won’t become trade-eligible until January 15. There are three interesting things in play here:
•Health. Billups’s brief comeback is already over, though he’ll presumably return soon. No one knows when Grant Hill will play again, or how effective he’ll be when healthy. Lamar Odom is rebounding better and generally looking almost like an NBA player again, but he’s still shooting 32 percent, including a horrid 4-of-24 from long range, and it’s unclear how much the Clippers will really be able to count on him against good teams in the playoffs.
• Rotation issues. Crawford is essential and isn't going anywhere. Barnes has, in many ways, outplayed Caron Butler, whose contract expires after next season. Barnes is a feisty defender and one of the most intuitive cutters in the league, a skill that fits nicely on a team with two offensive centerpieces that draw so much attention; he’s shooting 64 percent on two-point field goal tries. But he doesn’t have Butler’s ability to space the floor, and with Hill’s uncertain status, the Clippers probably need both Barnes and Butler — especially since being able to play smaller, with one of those two sliding to power forward, could be an important asset against a couple of potential playoff opponents (San Antonio, Oklahoma City, et al.).
The big rotation is always going to be in flux. DeAndre Jordan has fallen off after a hot start, and he’s still below 50 percent from the foul line — an issue that will make it dicey for the Clippers to close games with both Jordan and Blake Griffin on the floor. Odom and Turiaf have surpassed Hollins in the rotation, meaning Hollins could be available on the cheap for a team seeking an additional big man; Boston comes to mind as a potential suitor, since the coaching staff is familiar with Hollins’s game from last season. The Clips’ bench units are absolutely blitzing teams right now, but Odom and Turiaf are limited players, and the team might look around for an upgrade somewhere.
• Eric Bledsoe. The Clippers might be thinking too conventionally with Bledsoe, but within that context, the reality is that Chris Paul is always going to limit Bledsoe from getting the time he deserves. Only about 20 percent of Bledsoe’s minutes have come with Paul on the floor, and the Clippers have outscored the opposition by about 6.5 points per 100 possessions in those minutes — even while giving up points at what amounts to a league-worst rate, per’s stats database. (They were fine defensively with those two on the floor last season, though in fewer minutes than they’ve logged already this season.) Those defensive struggles and size issues likely explain Vinny Del Negro’s reluctance to use them together, despite Bledsoe’s super-long arms and general defensive ability.
Bledsoe’s in the top 10 overall in PER, and he's cut his turnover rate from “horrific” to “acceptable.” Paul's a free agent in the offseason, but the Clippers obviously want him back, and his cap hold soaks up their cap room — and their ability to pursue free agents above the mid-level exception. A Bledsoe trade feels almost inevitable, though the Clippers don’t need to do it this season, especially if they can’t find anything that would help their title chances. But teams are going to start calling more often, and the Clippers now have some additional pieces to throw around.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Preismanagement (Deutsch)

...Florian U. Siems 247 Absolutes vs. Relatives Preisurteil Preisgünstigkeitsurteil: Beurteilung der absoluten Preishöhe Preiswürdigkeitsurteil: Beurteilung der relativen Preishöhe (z.B. Preis-Leistungs-Urteil) © Jun.-Prof. Dr. Florian U. Siems 248 Ausgewählte Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Betrachtungen der Preispolitik 1. Drei-Speicher-Modell 2. Drei-Komponenten-Theorie 3. Absolutes vs. Relatives Preisurteil 4. Ankerpreistheorie 5. Preisschwelleneffe 6. Equity-Theorie 7. Preisabhängige Qualitätsbeurteilung 8. Maslow © Jun.-Prof. Dr. Florian U. Siems 249 Ankerpreis: Definition Quelle: Siems 2009, S. 249 Unter Ankerpreisen können allgemein interne Preisnormen – auch bezeichnet als „Preisanker (Diller 2008, S. 123f.) – von Individuen verstanden werden, die von diesen mit den beobachteten Preisen verglichen werden (Winer 1988, S. 35; Kalyanaram/Winer 1995, S. 164ff.; Hruschka 1996, S. 135f.; Bruhn/Homburg 2004, S. 47). Den Ankerpreis überschreitende Preise führen entsprechend dieser Theorie zu einer negativen Beurteilung durch das Individuum („Verlust“), während ein den Ankerpreis unterschreitender Preis eine positive Bewertung („Gewinn“) zur Folge hat und einen entsprechenden Anreiz zum Bezug der Leistung darstellt (Kucher 1985, S. 96; Winer 1988, S. 35, Hruschka 1996, S. 136). © Jun.-Prof. Dr. Florian U. Siems Ankerpreis: Wirkungsasymmetrie Empfundener Wert des Gewinns Verlust in Höhe von a Empfundener Wert des Gewinns in Höhe von......

Words: 15959 - Pages: 64

Premium Essay

Think Strtegically

...168, 170, 178 Emergent strategy vs. planned strategy, 14–16 European Central Bank (ECB), 51 Experimental exports, 173 External cooperation, 147–148 FC Barcelona, 144, 155, 166 FIFA Club World Cup, 166 Financial capabilities, 120, 190 Financial crisis, 3, 7, 28, 46, 49, 54, 62, 78, 99, 112, 183 Firm’s activities, 136–137, 136f Fixed costs, 70 Football NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association), 155 Fortune 500 companies, 62, 185 Functional strategy, 14, 138, 139 G x G organization, 119 General Motors, 22, 23, 103, 184, 185 GIB (General, Integrative and Basic) model, 29–32 generic strategies, 44f macro-environmental analysis, 52f, 59 company’s resources, 116f company’s capabilities, 121f key result areas, 118f capability-related stages, 123f industry value chain analysis, 132f macro industry analysis, 81f market analysis (segmentation and key success factors), 105f micro industry analysis, 100f company value chain analysis, 146f, 151f globalization and internationalization, 174f relationships, 152f Index Giropesca, 129–130 Global warming, 51 Globalization of an industry, 156–158 company activities, 162–164 comparative advantage of countries, 158 concentration of distribution channels, 160 decrease in protectionism, 160–161 demand factors, 162 factors influencing, 158–162 global economies of scale, 159 global experience curve, 161 homogenization of customers’ needs, 159–160 and market segments, 164–165 political factors, 162 reverse innovation, 167–169 stages in......

Words: 79436 - Pages: 318

Premium Essay

Transsctions and Economics

...gourmet restaurants, 138 governance of transactions, 54–56 contracts, 54 hierarchies, 55 markets, 54 F FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), 285 fair gamble, 456 fairness, 11–12 fast-food outlets, 138 FCC (Federal Communications Commission), 259, 285 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), 285 Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 259, 285 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), 78, 307 Federal Express, 168–169 Federal Reserve Board, 87 Federal Trade Commission (FTC), 149, 182, 318 FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), 78, 307 financial accountants, 116 financial constraints, 12 first-price auction, 219, 228–229 fishing, 283–285 cages, 284 identifiable ownership in, 285 laws, 284 property rights in, 283–285 fixed costs, 123f, 246–247 fixed input, 118 fixed salaries, 429 flip-in, 349 floor traders, 61–62 focal points, 496–497 538 Index mixed modes, 55–56 trade-offs, 55 government, competitive advantage and, 259–260 grand coalition, 500–501 Green Bay Packers, 362–365 operations, 364f organization chart, 363f grim trigger, 210–211 grocery industry, 236–239 group decisions, 25 group medical practice, 360 groups, 25 H Hassett, Kevin, 450 Hausman, Jerry, 450 heads or tails, 216–217 health insurance, 318–320 health maintenance organizations (HMOs), 318–320 hedge, 103, 475 Henry Hub, Louisiana, 103 heuristics, 20 Hewlett-Packard, 202 Hicks, John, 175 hierarchies, 55, 339 high-risk policyholders, 320–321 Hilton Hotels, 395 HMOs (health maintenance......

Words: 234748 - Pages: 939

Premium Essay

Disneyland Expansion

...Selangor, Malaysia: National University of Malaysia. Available at: [Accessed 29 Sep. 2014]. Riding, A. (1992). Seville's Extravaganza, Expo '92. [online] Available at: [Accessed 27 Sep. 2014]. Sharma, K., Nagayam, J. and Chung, H. (2012). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Malaysia: New Evidence From Co Integration and Error Correction Model. [online] Available at: [Accessed 30 Sep. 2014]....

Words: 1511 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Business Business Strategy Formulation Theory, Process, and the Intellectual Revolution

...Constants: definition of, 190; USFM, 50– 51, 51f, 58, 59, 62–63 Constraint, definition of, 190 Constraints, 39, 40f, 42, 44–46; CDMAP, 101f, 104–105, 108f, 111–112; USFM, 44–45, 79, 99 Cordis Corporation, case study, 134, 135– 136 Core competencies, 5 Criteria, in outcome-based logic, 31–35 Crossing chasms, 5 Customer: definition of, 14, 190; CDMAP, 101f, 102–103 Customer-Driven Mission Achievement Process (CD-MAP), 11–12; benefits of, 140–141; definition of, 189; disadvantages of, 141; evaluation of, 12–13, 13t; facilitator, definition of, 189; function of, 117; predictive metrics, 180; setting up equation, 100–107, 101f, 115; simplified process, 128; solving the equation, 107–114, 108f, 116; team, definition of, 190; time-line, 123f, 130f Customer requirements, 55, 57, 64 Customer satisfaction, desired outcomes measurement, 81–82 Customer set, definition of, 190 Customer types, 43–44, 121 Customer value, creation of, 94 Customer weighting, definition of, 190 Customers: knowledge of needs, 70–71; values, 55, 56–57, 61 Decision-making process, 2 ‘‘Deployment Normalization,’’ 176 Desired competitive position: CD-MAP, 101f, 107, 108f, 112; defining, 91–92, 92t, 100, 177–179, 178t, 179t; definition of, 79, 190; determination of, 89– 90, 90f; Southwest Airlines, 151–152, 152t; USFM, 79, 99 Desired outcome: criteria of, 66; definition of, 14, 42, 191 Desired outcome gathering session, definition of, 191 Desired outcomes, 39, 40f, 42–44, 48t, 56– 57, 56f;......

Words: 80455 - Pages: 322