Free Essay

12 Angry Men

In: Film and Music

Submitted By antonalexa
Words 5039
Pages 21
Corridors of Transition between 12 Angry Men and 12

“I have always found that mercy bears richer fruits than strict justice”. Abraham Lincoln

“The virtue of justice consists in moderation, as regulated by wisdom”. Aristotle

”Nobody gets justice. People only get good luck or bad luck”. Orson Welles

Justice = mid-12c., "the exercise of authority in vindication of right by assigning reward or punishment;" also "quality of being fair and just," from Old French justice "justice, legal rights, jurisdiction" (11c.), from Latin iustitia "righteousness, equity," from iustus "upright, just" . The Old French word had widespread senses, including "uprightness, equity, vindication of right, court of justice, judge." The word began to be used in English c.1200 as a title for a judicial officer. Meaning "right order, equity" is late 14c. Justice of the peace first attested early 14c. In the Mercian hymns, Latin iustitia is glossed by Old English rehtwisnisse. To do justice to (someone or something) "render fully and fairly showing due appreciation" is from 1670s.

This word, with such a strong connotation, influenced and formed the basis of many philosophical thinking; explained in a thousand ways, through a thousand procedures (methods), has been used for so long that it became hackneyed and often we do not know where it starts and where it ends anymore. Not only that it is not white or black, it is a lot of shades of gray, sometimes so similar that those who are color-blind will not even make a difference. But for the ones who do, it has been the subject of many works in many creative areas and if well-handled, it created art and great masterpieces. [1]

Sidney Lumet's film, 12 Angry Men (1957), is considered one of the best courthouse movies of all time. Although 93 of the 96 minutes happen in the jury room, the action never gets dull in any moment or any less intense. Through the simplicity of the framework, by the power of argument, the stereotypical characters, the symbols carefully placed throughout the film, the twists and the neat and calculated action, is depicted an issue of which the law and law enforcement have come across since centuries: the ethical conduct of judgment in terms of analyzing a court case considering all the details in front of which the laws remain silent most of the times.

50 years later, the Russian director Nikita Mikhalkov, armed with courage and the desire to broaden the view concerning the same subject, creates an impressive adaptation of the same scenario and a remake of the whole action: 12 (2007). The film, which is much longer (159 min.) always makes us think of its ancestor, of its original; the essence and the film's subject and even some details such as the characters or the objects, are almost the same, but what is designed to strike the viewer is the complexity of the added elements, the more entangled action and the mentality of a people that has experienced and lived most of life in a communist regime. My intention in this project is to identify and analyze the differences between the two films focusing on the temporal area, spatial area, the sequence of events, characters and symbols. I will approach a rather special parallel between them, in that I will not emphasize on the similarities that they share but exactly on what makes them distinct from one another, even though they share the same foundation. It is important to be aware of the diversity of conceptions about the human being when in a crisis situation; his/her concern in defining and seeking for their essence as individuals. The positive implications of this project reside in developing the introspection as a normal state; a more detailed version helps revealing the inner mechanisms, the very personal motivations and the spiritual springs. It’s about what you can trace back in their personal history by seeing their reaction- an entire belief system, born from experiencing life – as it is.

Temporal Area

Regarding the temporal area, the two films are set in two different periods: the mid-20th century USA and the 21st century Russia, both marked by political events and by two different regimes: one in a full bloom democracy while the other makes its first steps in a democracy with strong communist marks. It is only natural for a very large gap to exist between the two mentalities giving the fact that the social evolutionary moments are different. For example in Russia of 2007 the death penalty is not an option anymore; a worst case scenario being that the defendant to be sentenced to life imprisonment. It is a great challenge for director Nikita to display the same possible case in a period completely contemporary with him, in some very similar circumstances and from the point of view of more numerous and complex prospects. It is a time when Russia is a federal state and has many conflicts with other small states which fight for independence and try to preserve their national identity. A good time, found to justify the existence of a character, the young Chechen who stands in the middle of a permanent friction that generates dangerous situations for his people. His whole life is ruled by a war of harassment and the director uses it in a very suggestive way in order to characterize a way of life and thinking. It's an actual war, unfinished, with intermissions of apparent tranquility. In America, the events occur in a period of peace. People are not threatened by an imminent and permanent danger.

The language used by the Russian jurors is also in transformation b virtue of inertia still using words from the wooden language of communism. For example, they still address with the appellation “comrade” and phrases like “civic duty”. “Comrades…I mean…gentlemen. Let’s start” (min. 11:37). Their struggle to recover the old pattern to

represent their personalities and which previously had been totally distorted by the communist dictatorship is noticeable. If in the '57 movie version women had not yet gained the full right to be accepted in jobs that were reserved for men, here in the Russian film, the judge position is occupied by a woman. It shows a time when women already reap the fruits of a long struggle for emancipation. The technology development can not be avoided either. Jurors are asked to leave their cell phones outside before entering into the debate room. Communication brings its subtle influence in the interpersonal relationships manner which is immanent in the turn of phrase. Sidney Lumet introduced us to action in the hottest day of the year whereas Nikita Mihalkov opted for a cold day with snow and blizzard, more representative of the Russian soul essence. Another difference of perspective is the Russian creator’s use of a temporal collage where scenes from the accused young man’s past interfere with the present bringing their important contribution in understanding the situation. We are witnessing his childhood, his adolescence and the traumas experienced in this period. Time becomes a very poignant character for the director immortalizes it so well that the viewer senses it as someone who has an indispensable story to tell.

Spatial Area

The movie “12” places us in a totally different space from the “12 Angry Men” one. The décor exceeds in many ways the American film offering a wider range of deployment allowing the presentation of other adjacent events that enrich the action and eases the drama digestion. If the original film begins in an abrupt manner showing us from the very first seconds where all the action is happening and more precisely, the court, along the courtroom and afterwards the jury room; the remake begins by depicting images of the very action that triggers the trial. So the first images of the movie present us the defendant running down the stairs and out of the building in which the crime occurred. The next scene is a desolated space: a devastated place with victims and ruins after the Russian military action against the so-called Chechen terrorists. Along with the physical space, the access in the dream space is another important difference that occurs early in the movie; in his dream, the young defendant can contact his mother who died in the horrors of war. Thus we are introduced in the region of the Caucasus Mountains, his native place, wonderful by its nature and very bright through the transmitted messages. Even though both films show us from the beginning two slogans that motivate a whole existing, one of them is displayed in a space that provides security whereas the second one is on the battlefield. “12 Angry Men”:”Administration of Justice is the most firm pillar of good”; “12”: “Liberte, egalite, fraternite.”

The courtroom – in the American movie – is located in the very courthouse while in the Russian version all the deliberation takes place in a school adjacent to the court, namely in the gym. Before reaching the gym, the characters pass through several corridors of the school. It is a transition space that allows a light disconnection from the impending juror responsibility, the characters being surrounded by noisy children getting out of classes, while the usher explains why the court does not have an adequate room for such a

procedure. The place where they end up is a much larger one where sometimes you can hear the echo, with a more loaded decor which does not create the same sense of claustrophobia and restraint as in the Sidney Lumet's film. Moreover, by using the present objects an almost identical reenactment of the road taken by the old man who claimed he saw the young man running down the stairs, is possible. Also thanks to the width of the space another important sequence can be produced: the imaginary attack upon one of the jurors; it is introduced by locomotor and verbal manipulation into a fictional criminal attack on his entire family: juror number 11 attempting to convince juror number 4 to return to the vote of guilty. Continuing with the presentation of the spatial differences, the director adds the space in which the accused awaits the verdict, i.e. the cell where he is detained and imprisoned. This space is simple, cold, shabby, dark, strange and foreign. The boy’s memories bring along with the Russian space of Moscow, where the action takes place, another one in which he spent his childhood and made the first steps in his formation as an individual. We are introduced to the house where he lived as a child and later the backgrounds in which the war forced him to survive. Thus the audience transcends easily from one geographic area to another in order to receive political and historical information, necessary for understanding the entire situation.

Characters

Although there are some similarities between the characters of the two films, such as the fact that both defendants are part of a social minority, and the jurors seem to have about the same human characteristics, there are a lot of differences that give a different flavor to the Russian film.

The defendant

12 Angry Men 12
[pic] [pic]

In Nikita Mihalkov’s movie, the young man accused of murdering his adoptive father who was his biological uncle and also an officer of the Russian military, has a known identity: his name is Umar and he appears throughout the whole film. He is presented during two periods of his life: his childhood and his adolescence. If the viewer doesn’t know much about the defendant from “12 Angry Men” (background information, family history, name, childhood), Umar is not just a simple image, a simple idea, he is humanized, and all his evolution is well defined and interspersed throughout the film.

The audience has a clear image about his childhood, family background and social and historical factors influencing it. His entire family was killed in a military attack upon his home village. This set of information, images and short visual fragments brings him closer to the spectator, helping the latter form a clear and very personal version about the story of a life. Unlike Sidney Lumet's film, this young man moves in a setting where his mother, father, uncle and other key characters in his life appear. We can acknowledge his feelings of sadness, fear, pride, despair, helplessness and nonetheless of affection for his mother. All these elements help characterize him thus he is no longer the Other. We see his face, soul, thoughts and hopes; he gets under the viewer’s skin who finds it easy to empathize with him. We learn a few things about his original lineage tradition. Ever since he was a child he knew the knife folk dance specific to the Caucasus area. A very revealing dance of their brave, daring, bold and fighting spirit. It is easy to see how the character finds a way of expression in dance, a very percussive refuge. During the abidance in his cell, alone with his thoughts, waiting for the final decision, he resorts to the same dance which makes him warm, gives him strength and hope. Even if he is in a strange place, he connects to his roots and feels his belonging which makes him an exponent of his people. The fact that we are visually witnessing the traumatic experiences of the accused creates a much stronger impact than in the ’57 film, where a story about a childhood and a hard life was told in ambiguous terms. Umar forestalls the affectionate attention through the director’s complex presentation.

Juror no. 8 vs. Juror no. 3

[pic] [pic]

Although the essential similarity of these two characters from two different films, is the responsibility and self-consciousness both used in order to take a decision regarding the actions of a human life, as a result weighing in from the start with the presumption of a possible innocence, not hurrying to get it over with it as soon as possible; however, the differences are many. In “12 Angry Men” we had juror number 8 as the light figure, while in “12” we have juror number 3 as his correspondent. The director of the latter uses the same complex approaching style for the character’s personality.

By everything he sais and does step by step, the defining traits of juror number 3 are revealed. Thus he relates some aspects of his own life which justify his attitude and the desire that the whole case to be discussed very thoroughly and very carefully. If in Henry Fonda’s character we could only see his just and empathizing side, the side that was in strict connection with the discussed case of murder, in the one of the Russian juror the viewer has access to personal life stories, symbolic gestures and all their great effects and also testimonies about the reasons for voting not guilty. When proposing the second vote he confesses that he does not want to dirty his hands by voting the same as the others (unless everybody will stick with their initial vote – guilty) and explains his proposal in favor of a secret ballot: procrastination and the desire to avoid the effect of herd. The fact that he recounts a decisive sequence of his life, one which changed his life for the better, influenced the whole voting. Once the viewer and the other jurors have access to both personal and dramatic moments, each one of them give him an identity, he’s not just a simple juror anymore, and award him the substantiality of a human being. He knows how to use his own like experience so as to repay a good that he once received. His citizen obligation as a juror is based on his human being matrix but he is aware that along with his help of reaching the right verdict he would have done his duty and he would be returned to his everyday life with its own native responsibilities. A good example to demonstrate this feature of his is one of the last scenes of the film where he does not agree to take part in the action proposed by the first juror to help the young survive outside of prison. This kind of responsibility seems too cumbersome and beyond his powers. However the viewer does not see him more inferior in any way. The juror from “12 Angry Men” leaves the room along with the others once the vote is unanimous, while the Russian juror, at the end of the film, returns to the place of the debate after everybody left, saying a quick goodbye and closing that extraordinary case which challenged him and gave him strength to face eleven other jurors at the beginning of the film.

Juror no.1 vs. Juror no.1

[pic] [pic]

The director Sidney Lumet was very clear in his production which characters were meant to have a key role. Character juror number 1 was responsible only for maintaining the order and counting the votes. In the second production the same juror seems to have the same type of participation, up to a point. The twists at the end of the film is the also the climax bringing something extra that strikes the viewer in that he turns from a simple participant into a leader in an unexpected

situation. When everyone thought they had reached an absolute consensus, the one of not guilty, juror number 1 sticks with his original decision, still voting for guilty. Through the given arguments he proves that his vision is beyond the mere duty of solving a case and confesses his certainty of the boy’s innocence even from the beginning, but he believes that if the boy will remain locked he would be protected from some imminent danger that would threaten him constantly if he were in freedom. He is the only one who thinks about the future and Umar’s life once the vote will be of not guilty in unanimity. He is the only one who takes responsibility for homeless child left without any relatives. He proposes everyone to participate in his rescue and protection suggesting to be held in jail until those who might harm him are discovered and punished. Having no support from the other jurors, each arguing with their personal problems, work or family, he is put in the same situation with juror number three: that is to propose a vote and after that, if everybody remains in their decision of voting not guilty, he would join them. At this point he is very determined in what has to be done to give this child the proposed bailout. Indeed after the boy is released he thrusts out his hand and gives him shelter and the necessary support, promising that those who put him in his misery will be caught and punished.

The other jurors

The “12 Angry Men” character known as the juror number 9 is one of the most important figures in the film; is the one whose name we get to know along with the one of the main character’ and he is one of the key characters. His correspondent in “12” could be juror number 5.

[pic] [pic]

They have approximately the same age and are the first ones to change their vote, providing support for the juror who once was alone against all. I would dare say that their similarities stop there. If the viewer knows nothing concrete about the old man from the first movie, the one from the remake reveals his religion: namely Hebrew. Here we might even say that juror resembles Sidney Lumet's juror number 11, both being part of a minority.

[pic]

But unlike juror number 9 the character from the Russian film has no contribution to the elucidation of the essential arguments in the case. He has a relatively narrow participation and in a vast area of the film he is nothing more than an observant but passive participant. Another character, very stereotypical and quite easy to find in both films is juror number 3 respectively juror number 11.

[pic] [pic]

Both are portrayed as people who are easy tempered who remain very firm on their vote being adamant on the idea that the boy is guilty. Also, they both narrate a story related to their children, although slightly different. The one from the film “12” does not have that tyrant and dictatorial father feature; he is humanized and the viewer realizes this when he learns that his wife left him, starts working to provide a decent life for his son and by understanding the trauma that he was going through he can empathize with the trauma of the accused, thus changing his vote. What the viewer may find interesting is a slight resemblance to juror number 10 in the American film, both having prejudices: number 10 against racial minorities of the U.S., and number 11 against the Judaic religion.

[pic]

Two other characters with very different personalities, but who have something in common are juror number 5 and juror number 2. Both come from the so-called notorious areas thus having a broader view on some particular aspects of the case.

[pic] [pic]

Following other characters of the director Nikita we notice that each comes with an impressive life story, all ending with bringing out to light the best part of a human being; of this human characteristic that builds hope and confidence in one another. Most change their opinion after their own insights. In this regard, there are two similar characters from the two movies: juror number 12 and juror number 3; they both have troubles in sticking with their final votes.

[pic] [pic]

As if everyone would have equally important roles in bringing the truth to light, most of them get actively involved offering the viewer background information of their own lives, they become vulnerable and fragile and make us empathize and get involved at a very subtle level . Even if the ‘57 film everybody has something to say at some point, it can be seen with the naked eye who are the main characters, the ones that leave a mark on all the action; while the 2007 film disposes them all on the same level of importance regarding the events and even the end.
In the remake, humanity is the most important highlighted feature.

Symbols

Given that almost all the action is based on dialogue in the original movie, the symbols helped the viewer to ponder beyond the auditory images, but they weren’t all that many. So the white suit makes us think of an enlightened character, perhaps even with angelical characteristics. The one who chooses to look in his conscience, who is constantly searching for the truth, without any prejudices, always trying to keep his calm, his temper. Even in the tensest moments. The heat is contributing to tension and nervousness. Physical discomfort added to a group of people eager to leave and wash their hands of responsibility can only intensify the pressure. One could say that it is a big factor for the men’s anger, rising up to the surface those odors. The rain is meant to clear the air, to calm the spirits and to bring balance. It also helps in taking a large breath of fresh air to continue a discussion that seems endless, but which is starting to lead somewhere. That fact that it is a pouring rain may suggest to the audience that the reach of the climax is imminent. The whether, the light and the fan work hand in hand. After the rain starts, the room gets darker so the light is turned on. A few second after that the fan also starts working. The fact that they turn on the light may be interpreted by the viewer as if their minds are starting to enlighten and with the starting of the fan, the jurors continue their debate with reinforcements. The setting makes the audience feel like they are locked in the jury room participating with the other jurors to come to a verdict. There is no real access but a sense of integration is transmitted, that makes the viewer feel they can contribute to an important cause.

In the movie “12”, the symbolism is extraordinary rich and suggestive. In order of their appearance, they are:

• The dream of the young defendant. In a natural environment of peace and freedom, in a full sunny afternoon, the boy rushes on a bike to his mother who is waiting for him in a field of flowers and speaking in their native language: Chechen. He believed that this framework would have remained untouched in its beauty if people would have given up their desire for autonomy and independence. For this reason he asks his mother to speak in Russian. The fall off •

his bike brutally reminds him that everything was already lost, his mother actually died long ago and he is already in the dock.

• The group of children out of school and run the halls screaming and laughing. They appear to be carefree and untouched by the vicissitudes of life. They symbolize the liberty and innocence in contrast to Umar's lifetime. • The piano from the gym that is stored after closed bars, but which still can be played, demonstrates that despite the fact that access is denied and he is increasingly isolated it manages to achieve its mission and to embellish the atmosphere through music. It is presented as Umar’s lifeless brother who in turn is enclosed and confined, but who still appears to preserve hope and not give up on what he considers to be predestined to him. • The basketball thrown into the hoop by one of the jurors right before the debate gets stuck between the panel and the ring throughout the entire movie. Blocked and out of reach, it symbolizes the rigidity of the jurors’ minds, almost impossible to be moved and changed from their initial decision. Only at the end, after the clash of opinions reconciles and the decision is unanimous, the basketball leaves its fixed, motionless position, falling on the floor. • The popular dance of the knife from the Caucasus appears three times during the film. It is danced for the first time by Umar as a child and the Chechen soldiers, gathered outside the forest, in a halt. Full of pathos and vibrancy in a very fast pace, the knife dance is a form of unleashing the ideals, vital for a people. The second time the teenager Umar is dancing it in order to keep himself warm in the cold cell while waiting for the verdict. This time the dance is a friend who accompanies him everywhere as a part of his very being - in joy and sorrow. The third time, juror number two, who had grown up in the same area and knew very well the traditions and habits, out of the desire to prove how that type of knife is handled, which is a symbol of a philosophy and a lifestyle under the sign of a permanent defensive, calls at the dance to show how to apply a deadly blow. • The old and patched pipe from an already damaged installation, warns in an unpleasant way, outrages the look of one of the jurors. Initially used as a provisional solving method, unnoticing it becomes a permanent one. It represents the inertia of a communist regime that although promoted intentions of development, it always stumbled over its own shortcomings. • The next symbol that appears in the film, is a small bird that enters one of the room windows and remains there throughout the whole meeting. Its appearance is not in a moment of balance but when the scale was still inclined towards the guilty decision. As a shadow witness, it investigates, observes, hears and intervenes. When juror number 11 is in a state of nervous and quite dangerous overexcitement negatively influencing the atmosphere, making everyone tense, this bird brings him down to earth projecting her feces on the angry one’s forehead. It is the free will, the one who must govern the being to make the best choices without being constrained by prejudices or influences. When everything is in place and the storm has ended, she leaves the scene as a sign that it has served its purpose. •

• The electric light intervenes several times to emphasize certain states of evolution and stagnation in the decision. As the unproductive mind of man stands motionless in the dark, when it foresees solutions and resolutions, it lightens up. Light is needed when they try to reenact the events confessed by the old neighbor. As a warning, it goes off every time they persist in error and it seems that its purpose is to turn them on the right track. For example, when juror number four changes his vote back to guilty, suddenly they remain in the dark. Moment of mental reorganization. After presenting the situation from juror’s 6 totally new perspective that shows that it was actually a premeditated murder and the young man is just a scapegoat, the light turns back on and the discussion is heading towards the correct conclusion. Another timely intervention has the same moment the bird helped to calm the spirits. The last time light acts as a warning is when juror number four returns to the not guilty vote. The shocking interventions no longer being needed, they remain in a more frail light more until the end. • The religious icon, specific for the Christian Orthodox religion is placed from the beginning on one of the shelves; the audience does not realize it until the end, when the one to whom it belongs, namely juror number three, goes back in the already empty room, takes it and puts it back in his wallet. Along with the bird and light, the icon is also a sign of a people’s deeply religious faith. Element of divinity, it oversees the events. • The last symbol consists of the opening of the windows when the fresh air and the snowflakes come storming into the room; the room where Umar’s hope revived. Now the picture is totally changed and integrated into the world of matter.
-----------------------
[1] http://etymonline.com/?term=justice…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

12 Angry Men

...12 Angry Men The 12 Angry Men movie was a perfect example of the Bruce Tuckman Scheme. Once the Jurors go in for deliberation they immediately start two get into the stages of the scheme. Once they are all in the juror’s room and get settled they start the storming stage. As soon as the juror’s get into the storming stage there is a lot of arguing. By the time they start the norming stage the juror’s are still arguing with one another but they are starting to listen to the people who are trying to show there opinion of reasonable doubt. By the end they all get to go home once they come to a unanimous decision. When the juror’s enter the room at the beginning of the movie they automatically start the forming stage to get each to know each other. When they first get into the jurors room most of them are ready to vote guilty and go home. When juror eight votes not guilty all the other jurors got really mad. At that moment they entered into the forming stage. Juror eight explains to the others why he felt that the defendant was not guilty. They all voted again and anonymously and one juror had changed his mind. After the second vote the other ten jurors got even more upset because they new they were going to be there even longer. The jurors entered into the norming stage as juror eight explained all the reasons why he had voted not guilty. As he explained each of his reasons for not voting the defendant guilty, one by the jurors started to change there opinion about......

Words: 445 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...Issues 12 Angry Men (original title: 12 Angry Men) is an American film from 1957, written by Reginald Rose. The film received three Academy Award nominations, best picture, best director and best adapted screenplay. It is an excellent example of 1950s social awareness and preparation of the common people in everyday situations. The film is thus a purely naturalistic wonders where all the action happens in real time, except for the film's beginning and end, in one place. Historically, we can look at the film in the context of the year of publication, 1957. USA was at this time in a political transition period. The civil rights movement was already well underway with the judgment of Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 and the bus boycott in Montgomery in 1956. Many of the film's themes is about racial and social inequalities which characterize this era in American history. The film is critical of society and provokes important social issues in the course of action. Examples are "class differences", "justice", "doubt", "one-to-many" and "the relationship between father and son." Together these stresses, a specific, comprehensive theme through action races, namely the "prejudice". Jury members' prejudices and personal insights against the accused, the trial and to one another is driving both the problem and the resolution of the action. The problem is thus as follows: How are the jury members' judgment influenced by prejudice? Action Report It is late......

Words: 4640 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Consensus and 12 Angry Men

...I recently watched a dramatic “case study” on group behavior and communication: the 1957 movie 12 Angry Men. The movie shows how one individual shaped and ultimately changed the direction of a group decision. The story goes that 12 jurors must reach a verdict that could require the death penalty for an 18-year-old defendant charged with stabbing his father to death. The jurors must reach consensus—the verdict must be unanimous. When they begin their deliberations, 11 vote guilty. Only one sees the case differently and is open to considering that there may be reasonable doubt. He raises his concerns about the trial, the evidence, and the performance of the boy’s lawyer, and continues to ask questions for the others to consider. He also takes the extra effort to provide evidence of his own, for example, purchasing the identical knife used in the murder at a local pawn shop (this knife was purported to be unusual and one of a kind) and pacing the distance the witness claimed he crossed in 15 seconds. It actually took 3 times longer. He wasn’t the strongest voice nor the most passionate believer. He simply had a reasonable doubt and he felt he owed it to the boy on trial to ensure there was sufficient discussion to justify their verdict. He did not bully the others to come to his conclusions, but he stood firm against the bullying of others who would shut down the discussion just to be done with it. Collaborative groups use consensus for decision making. To reach......

Words: 867 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...2B 12 Angry Men Evidence Essay There is a lot to debate about murder cases.there is an especially large amount of evidence to debate in the play “12 Angry Men”. The evidence provided for the trial was easily disproven by the jury members thus proving the defendant innocent. The old man’s testimony proved the defendant innocent. He claimed to have heard the boy yell “I’m going to kill you” and then saw the boy running off seconds later. During this time a train was passing by, and because of the man’s age he needed a cane to walk. This proves he couldn’t of heard the boy yelling and he couldn’t of walked fast enough to see him run off. The old woman’s testimony was more doubtful than untrue. She claimed she had seen the boy murder his father from her bedroom window. The problem is the fact that she needs bifocals to see clearly, and the train was passing between their apartments during the time of the murder. She wouldn’t of been able to see clearly enough to identify the murderer . This rules in favor of the boy’s innocence. The knife wound was also suspicious. The wound was created by a downward stab to the chest. This probably would’ve been insignificant if the defendant didn’t have knife fighting experience. In a knife fight the contenders would of being stabbing upward in hopes of driving the knife in deep. This makes it less possible that he would’ve stabbed downward. All in all, it’s proven that the defendant was......

Words: 292 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...Elizabeth Herrera April 23, 2014 Comm 151 12 Angry Men: Communication Analysis In the film, 12 Angry Men, viewers come across a group of men who display the different communication dynamics – both the positive and negative sides. Chapter 7 encompasses the idea of Group and Team Communication Skills and how one should communicate effectively among others. To help better understand, 12 Angry Men is centered on a jury’s deliberation in a murder case. A group of men are given the job to deliberate the life of a young boy who has been accused of murdering his father. With only a knife that’s been left behind in the murder scene and a few witnesses who claim they heard the boy scream and run out of the room; these 12 jurors will have to come up with a reasonable doubt in favor to spare the boys life or cast him guilty. Eleven of the jurors vote guilty while Juror 8 is the only one who votes “not guilty.” As the story starts to unfold, viewers get a glimpse of the juror’s personalities, communication approach, culture, preconceptions, and background and how theses factors influence their deliberation and their treatment towards one another. We can draw from the film that poor Conversational Style was used, the book notes, “Sometimes barriers are not in words but in how they are delivered” (145). These men were not respectful with one another when it came to speaking their turn due to their difference in opinions; which led them to lash out at one another. The book......

Words: 787 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...12 Angry Men depicts the New York murder trial. The premise is the trial of a frightened, teenaged defendant accused of stabbing and killing his father. The judge advises the 12 jurors, that a unanimous decision needs to be made with fair and unbiased manner. If the jury decides unanimously that the boy is guilty he will be sentenced to death. However, if there is a reasonable doubt, the jury needs to reach a ‘not guilty’ decision, and the boy will be freed. A life and death decision needs to be made. The process whereby the difficult decision is reached illustrates a situation where a minority transforms the opinion of a majority by exerting persuasive tactics. The group is challenged by various opinions, intense frustrations, and lack of participation, stubbornness and indifferent attitudes. Throughout their deliberation, they fluctuate between difference, disagreement, controversy and contention. Their prejudices, personalities, cultural differences, weaknesses, priorities, socio economic, ignorance and fears often cause them to avoid the true issues of the case. This makes the jury find it difficult to reach its final verdict. At the beginning, The Judge gave the jurors a speech about their responsibilities in their deliberation. But he was not potent and forceful enough in his deliver, which was kind of boredom. This failed to convey to many of the jurors the importance of their role as a juror. When the deliberation starts, many of the jurors just want to quickly......

Words: 1019 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...12 Angry Men By pacaf123 | Studymode.com 12 Angry Men Mid Term PROC 5840 Directed by: Sidney Lumet Writing credits: Reginald Rose (story and screenplay)   Table of Contents Table of Contents2 Cast3 Major Case Issues4 Juror #85 Juror #49 Juror #312 References15   Cast 1957 ActorJuror #Character DescriptionOrder of 'not guilty' vote Martin Balsam1/The ForemanThe jury foreman, somewhat preoccupied with his duties; proves to be accommodating to others. An assistant high school football coach9th John Fiedler2A meek and unpretentious bank clerk who is at first domineered by others but finds his voice as the discussion goes on.5th Lee J. Cobb3A businessman and distraught father, opinionated and stubborn with a temper; the antagonist12th E. G. Marshall4A rational stockbroker, unflappable, self-assured, and analytical11th Jack Klugman 5A young man from a violent slum, a Baltimore Orioles fan3rd Edward Binns6A house painter, tough but principled and respectful6th Jack Warden7A salesman, sports fan, superficial and indifferent to the deliberations7th Henry Fonda8An architect, the first dissenter and protagonist. Identified as "Davis" at the end1st Joseph Sweeney9A wise and observant elderly man. Identified as "McCardle" at the end2nd Ed Begley10A garage owner; a pushy and loudmouthed bigot10th George Voskovec11A European watchmaker and......

Words: 3647 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...Defiance Of course, one of the famous, attractive and effective movies, which illustrate jury trial system in the US, is Twelve Angry Men (1957). American Film Institute revealed that the movie was the second best film in the Court Drama genre (AFL’s 10 Top 10). Exploration of this film, when jury trial does not happen in Islamic Court, deeply influenced the concepts such as the true judgment and justice in my mind as a Muslim. This paper is aimed to discuss and analysis several instances of defiance behaviors, which are displayed in the movie. It also considers strategies groups utilize to extinguish defiance in each instances of defiance. The first scene; all jurors sat around the table exception for the foreman who concerned to keep formal procedure in the group. He mentioned if all jurors get a unanimous verdict, the defendant would charge mandatory death sentence. He started to count the votes “guilty”, while jurors were raising their hands. Juror number 1, 3, 4, 7, 10 and 12 quickly put up their hands but jurors 2, 5, 6, 11 and 9 raised with slightly pause. Juror number 8 was the only person who believed the boy is not guilty and he had not been conceived to put someone into a death sentence:”It's not easy to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first...We're talking about somebody's life here. We cannot decide in five minutes.” Certainly, it would be hard to become alone against the group. The juror number 8 is the......

Words: 1304 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...The 12 Angry Men Case Dennis Ojwang Organizational Management 701 February 26, 2015 When this movie was made, no one could have depicted that it would greatly speak of the ever changing dynamics of our world today. Immigration and diversity seem to have plagued the world now more than ever and it is no surprise that the business world has been changed tremendously. When this movie came out in 1957, there wasn’t much diversity as we see it today. Upon watching this movie, various topics covered, ranging from power and influence, ethical decision making and diversity, group formation and dynamics, cultural diversity, organizational culture, conflict management and then, there’s an introduction of Fiedler’s leadership model. The setting of the movie offers consistency, investment, rigidity, autonomy and fairness in terms of assessing different levels of conflict and negotiation. I would say that the most evident styles of conflict in the movie are accommodating, compromising and collaborating conflict resolution styles. The jury is involved in a high profile case about a young boy who, if found guilty, then he will be sent to the electric chair. There are several topics that are related to organizational management class that will be portrayed throughout this jury process. The jury, in determining the fate of the young man, who murdered his father, must closely work together and whether consciously or unconsciously, they have been introduced to the forming, storming,......

Words: 1735 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...Jessica Robinson Professor Romano 12 Angry Men When one get subpoenaed for jury duty, they seem to always want a case that is easy to render a verdict and it won’t take all of their time; well people can’t always get what they want. In the film 12 Angry Men, 12 men were chosen to sit on a jury for a murder case. A case that after hearing all of the evidence they assumed it was an open and closed case. A few of the jurors were very excited because they had baseball games to attend along with other personal events going on in their lives. All were ready to make the vote of a guilty verdict, oh but one. After calming down, stretching legs, and a little small talk, the foreman decided to assign that the setting would be in order from juror numbers 1 thru 12 around the table. They took a vote to see were everyone stood on their decision and there were 11 guilty and 1 not guilty votes. That’s when the other 11 had the opportunity to persuade the 1 to vote guilty, however, it was a difficult job. This one particular juror saw room for reasonable doubt within the testimonies of the witnesses and the remainder of the evidence and wanted to discuss them a little more. The reasons for voting guilty were all over the place. Some of the men had logical reasoning for the decision and others just had not particular reason at all, just because they thought he was guilty. Some assumed he was guilty because a woman who lived across from the......

Words: 964 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

12 Angry Men

...12 Angry Men Writing Assignment Final Exam Project Due: ________________________________________ (EDMODO) You will see a lot of psychological phenomena exhibited in the movie 12 Angry Men. Many of these phenomena are listed in the boxes on the next page. Your task for this assignment is to watch the movie, take note of these various psychological phenomena, and then write a cohesive 2-3 page paper discussing these themes. In writing your paper you must pick at least 5 separate incidences from the movie. For each incidence, describe how it relates to psychological phenomenon. Be sure to use concepts from across all of psychology. Do NOT, for example, just pick examples from social psychology (such as conformity and stereotyping); use examples from cognition, memory, sensation, and perception, etc. as well. In order to construct a cohesive essay, you should structure your discussion of the 4 incidences around a central area. That is, your paper needs to be more than just a loose collection of summary points. Consider how you can tie all the incidences together around a central psychological idea. * Behavior is determined by multiple causes: For any complex human behavior, multiple reasons exist as to why that behavior was done. For example, consider your study behavior. It is determined by intelligence, memory and attentional constraints, and social factors. * Behavior is shaped by cultural heritage: At several points in the semester we discussed how the......

Words: 717 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

12 Angry Men Case

...12 Angry Men is a gripping drama that depicts twelve American jurors confined to a jury room on a hot and humid summer day to decide the guilt or innocence of a defendant in a murder trial.1 Before sending out the twelve jurors to deliberate, the judge reminds them that their verdict must be unanimous and that if they hold “reasonable doubt” as to the guilt of the accused then their verdict must be “not guilty.” If, however, they find the defendant guilty then he will be sentenced to death. Eleven of the jurors, believing that the prosecution has presented an “open-and-shut”case,quickly vote for conviction.They believe that the young, poor Puerto Rican defendant, who has a criminal record and lives in the “slums,” killed his father with a switchblade knife. The sole initial dissenter is Juror 8, played in the film by Henry Fonda, who votes“not guilty” as the deliberations begin. As the film proceeds, he deconstructs the pros- ecution’s case, progressing from communicating a sense of vague uneasiness to articulating a precise refutation of the other jurors’ specific arguments. The Negotiation Environment To analyze the negotiation environment in 12 Angry Men, we adopt the methodology outlined by Rojot (1991), who wrote that a negotiation is structured by the relationship between the parties, the resources and con- straints within the environment, and the bargaining power. Rojot identified two significant dimensions for evaluating the......

Words: 963 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

12 Angry Men

...Juror 3- angry, loud opinionatedJuror 4- opinionated, nervous motion (he tends to pace the room), serious, logicalJuror 5- reasonable, uses his own experiences to make his arguments.Juror 9- would be seen as the mediator, the man who brings harmony to the process. He is older, retired, and he stands up for what he believes in without flinching.Jurors 12 and 7 are the followers of the group. They simply go along with whoever is talking at the moment.Juror 2- calm, shy, quietJuror 10- angry, loud, prejudicedBackgroundThe movie 12 Angry Men begins with a boy who is on trial for murder of his father. The jury, comprising of 12 men is locked in a room to decide the verdict of the case. 11 out of the 12 jurors are convinced that the boy is guilty, however one juror believesthat there is reasonable doubt for the boy to not be guilty. In the rest of the movie, the jury discusses the case and slowly the juror who believes the boy is not guilty, convinces the rest that there is reasonable doubt in the case.Communication barriersJuror 1 – This juror takes the lead and tries to keep the discussion in order. He tries to be fair to all jurors despite thinking the boy to be guilty.Juror 3 – This juror’s argument lies on his own prejudices and life experiences. He comes across as very angry, loud, opinionated and aggressive. He uses definite words like “I know”, “You can’t” etc. He fails to listen to the other jurors and stubbornly stick to his stand.Juror 4 – This juror tries to bring logic...

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

12 Angry Men

...12 Angry Men Analysis In the movie “12 Angry Men” there is a young man on trial for murder. The year is 1957, so the jury consists of all white, middle class to upper class, middle aged and up men. Some of their occupations consist of architect, salesman, broker and a man in advertisement. Which if you know anything about a jury today it is completely different. You have many different people of all race, gender, and social class, within that community, to receive a more fair trial. Also you can’t bring in any previous information into the trial or bring any emotional attachment into the case. Having a jury like in the “12 Angry Men” is not having a fair jury or trial what so ever, they are either going to all agree with each other, persuade one another or think like each other. One of the characters played by Henry Fonda goes against the grain, and votes not guilty. This really sends the other jurors up the wall, more particularly the head strong jurors. They want nothing to do with him and don’t want to listen to what he has to say. Henry Fonda speaks out and votes the opposite of all the other jurors. He does so because he wants to discuss the facts and the evidence, he isn’t convinced he is guilty or he is innocent. Fonda wants to do so because he does not want to but a boy to his death without discussing this matter into more depth. This is the boy’s life they have in the palm of their hands after all, and he couldn’t live with the guilt if he would have been peer......

Words: 1022 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

12 Angry Men

...MOVIE: 12 Angry Men As the jurors initiate the first vote, which was done publicly, it was obvious that conformity took place. In the words of Wikipedia, “Conformity is the process by which an individual's attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors are influenced by what is conceived to be what other people might perceive.” As they took this initial vote you can see how each are looking around to see how the next person is voting so that they can vote with the majority, even though they barely put in time to talk the case through – except Henry Fonda (HF). All except HF only has the concern of getting out of deliberation as soon as possible. HF truly would like to discuss the case in details and to look at it from all possible angles. While he may think the boy may have killed his father, he still believes he deserves a fair and thorough trial, especially since a guilty verdict sentences the defendant to death. Unfortunately, the high level of conformity caused the jurors deliberations to go on longer than it may have if everyone initially gave the vote they wanted with some sort of reasoning behind it whether or not it disagreed with the next man. The initial nonchalant vote caused some jurors to attempt to influence others in order to convince them of their case. Many of the jurors wrote off the boy based on stereotypes about growing up in the slums and belonging to a minority group. There were also some who were biased towards the evidence presented and only chose to reflect......

Words: 759 - Pages: 4